Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Last time I was there I enjoyed eating a Sub outside the store, there are some chairs and tables underneath a couple of trees outside the store, it's much more comfortable than the crowded store. :D
 
Whenever pitching before/after graphics, always show the new in bright sunlight, with perfectly clean, sanitized surroundings, and show the existing structure on a dark evening, on an overcast, rainy day with cluttered surroundings.

Looks good.

Personnally, I think the darker picture with backlight glow is far cooler looking, all other things being equal
 
Whenever pitching before/after graphics, always show the new in bright sunlight, with perfectly clean, sanitized surroundings, and show the existing structure on a dark evening, on an overcast, rainy day with cluttered surroundings.

Looks good.

You might say the difference is night and day... :D
 
Hope one of the new panels doesn't break or crack. The cost of replacing one panel just skyrocketed!
 
I think it looked fine and was cutting-edge in the first place. It had only been up for less than 5 years, and they are already re-doing it. Apple just has too much money to throw around right now on this chicken gibberish.

It's taking money out of Apple's pocket and putting in others, is it not? How is it a bad thing that Apple is spending some of that $75B they have tucked under their mattress?
 
I think it looked fine and was cutting-edge in the first place. It had only been up for less than 5 years, and they are already re-doing it. Apple just has too much money to throw around right now on this chicken gibberish.

I thought I read that Steve Jobs paid for the cube himself. It’s a rich many’s hobby, or artistic vision, depending how you look at it...

Now, if that is true, I still haven’t heard who paid for the new one!

In any case, for perspective, that store hit 350M annual sales two years ago. Surely much higher now.
 
Why Change?

Both look alright but yet I can't help wonder why the real reason for spending several millions of dollars. Well there is a old saying, " when you got it, just flaunt it" and they got it.:confused:
 
I like the original.

The original seemed more mechanical, with purpose, while the renovation seems more magical, almost an implausible gravity defying feat with the material. I have always liked the work of Mies Van Der Rohe more than Frank Gehry, but if a retail store generates this type of discussion it is already a winner.

Apples use of he architectural firm Bohlin Cywinski Jackson was an excellent choice, funny it was the same firm that designed Bill Gates Home, and yes it was designed on a Mac. Unfortunately Bernard Cywinski, FAIA passed away in March of this year. He will be missed.
 
Last edited:
I prefer the old one - because I can see it! I can see people walking face-first into the new one, looking all shocked and surprised, then embarrassed when they realise what they've just done..
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_3 like Mac OS X; sv-se) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8J2 Safari/6533.18.5)

Steve likes it clean! So when can we expect the one piece of glass cube design? ;)
 
Does Apple realize that this Cube is the most photographed site in New York city? It's a landmark in a city full of landmarks.
 
I think they should have used the 6 million on building Apple Stores in areas that lack them.

You're point is a good one - but there is only ONE New York City.

The old store was, reportedly, the single most photographed tourist attraction in NYC. The free PR about the new cube is worth many multiples of $6,000,000. :eek:

From a marketing standpoint, you can't get that kind of return on investment building a store in Iowa or Alabama (no insult intended to Iowa and Alabama).

Not fair to customers in underserved areas, but worth the investment to Apple.;)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.