Yup, there’s nothing groundbreaking, earthshaking or innovative about it.
There’s a reason that the three cameras are all 12MP and are equidistant from each other: basic physics.
That doesn't really make sense though. If anything, it's the other way round:
Finally a green color.
2019 iPhones will feature a centered Apple logo on the back of the devices, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman.
The centered logo will help users know where to place their Apple Watch or AirPods case to charge on the back of the upcoming iPhones, which are widely expected to have a new Qi-based device-to-device charging feature, similar to Wireless PowerShare on Samsung's latest Galaxy smartphones.
Wireless PowerShare on Samsung's Galaxy S10
In late July, an alleged Foxconn worker claimed that there will be no "iPhone" branding on the back of the iPhone 11 models, and this certainly seems more likely in light of this centered Apple logo rumor.
Taking both rumors into account, concept designer Ben Geskin has mocked up how the iPhone 11 models should look:
Gurman also reiterated that iPhone 11 models will have more shatter-resistant glass and improved water resistance, the iPhone XR will come in a new green color, and that this year's Apple Watch refresh will be relatively minor, with a focus on new ceramic and titanium casing finishes and watchOS 6.
We're just three days away from Apple's event at Steve Jobs Theater, which kicks off Tuesday at 10 a.m. Pacific Time. Apple will be live streaming the event via its website, the Apple Events app on Apple TV, and YouTube. MacRumors will have full coverage of the announcements as they unfold -- stay tuned!
Article Link: Bloomberg: 2019 iPhones Will Have Centered Apple Logo on Back
I didn’t realize green was that popular, but given Apple is reportedly bringing it, they obviously feel it’ll be a decent seller. As someone who has never used a case, I’m all for new colors
There wont be, we would welcome the change. While 5w defenders make excuses why Apple no longer thinks charging over 5w hurts their battery health or over 5w is useless because you charge at night.I don’t know about the masses but I’ve been charging my iPhones with the iPad brick since 2011. We’ll have to see what 2019 brings (and if the phone charges faster than 18w and what the battery size will be) but it will be interesting to see the “snarky comments from the 5w critics.”
I don’t think this is anywhere near the way it it is at all. People don’t “miss” out, they choose that it doesn’t matter to them. Rather than making more e-waste Apple based jn their market research is providing what the majority will use. This is IMO, but at least as plausible or not plausible as the above, since none of this can be proven.
The 5w defenders are correct, batteryuniversity.com. The 5w critics may not collectively understand this.
"Apple makes the choices they believe make the most sense and will satisfy the most customers."Nobody’s “forcing” you to charge at night lol. Plug it in every three hours and charge it for fifteen minutes for all I (or Apple or anyone) care. Like I said, whatever floats your boat. You do you!
It’s going to be 5W until it isn’t. But it’s not a matter of backtracking, it’s that Apple will have decided that a higher wattage charger is something they want to put in the box. They haven’t yet, but they might. (I’m fine either way.)
You’ll note that I never said 5W is the best option, or that Apple should never increase it. I’m merely stating my opinion on why they’re doing what they’re doing.
That Apple doesn’t supply the charger you personally would prefer to all 200 million customers who buy iPhone every year doesn’t mean you’re wrong for wanting it. You can also want a 4K display on iPhone. Or a thicker, heavier iPhone that lasts a little longer and doesn’t have a camera bump.
But you don’t always get what you want. Apple can’t give everyone their own idea of a perfect iPhone. Apple makes the choices they believe make the most sense and will satisfy the most customers. That’s really all there is to it. Other manufacturers make different choices and that’s fine too.
So the majority wont use an 18w charger if Apple included it? They will go out and buy a 5w charger instead of using the 18w charger right? Do you actually read the things you say?
I don’t know what anybody will do, you can’t either.
As much as everybody else.
Flat out disagree. You gonna prove it or just deflect. Want fast charging then get a brick, don’t care use the 5w.
Lol not shocked at your responses. Not sure why I even expected better.I don’t know what anybody will do, you can’t either.
As much as everybody else.
Flat out disagree. You gonna prove it or just deflect. Want fast charging then get a brick, don’t care use the 5w.
There’s a reason that the three cameras are all 12MP and are equidistant from each other: basic physics.
Maybe some want a triangular bump instead? Not me, that would look so much worse... completely ridiculous
Part of “what makes the most sense” of course is controlling cost. Otherwise you’d have 4K displays, 8GB RAM, 128GB base storage, etc. Apple has never been about specs just for the sake of specs. If Apple’s costs go up, the prices the customer pays go up and who wants that?
