no it's not. they should ditch the cable as well. let us decide what we need and stop producing what we don't.No earbuds is one thing.
But no power adapter is just ridiculous.
no it's not. they should ditch the cable as well. let us decide what we need and stop producing what we don't.No earbuds is one thing.
But no power adapter is just ridiculous.
Are they going to charge you for it? Thats the question. If the price doesn’t drop then they are just ripping you off.no it's not. they should ditch the cable as well. let us decide what we need and stop producing what we don't.
edit: never mind..... I'll still have old cables and bricks that connect to lightning. Carry on....So the cable is going to be USB-C even though most of the extra adapters supposedly cluttering up people’s drawers are most likely the 5W USB-A adapters?
The insert exhibits a very thin profile with a circular area that would be for a USB-C to Lightning cable and a square area that could be for paperwork and the traditional stickers that come with Apple products...
no it's not. they should ditch the cable as well. let us decide what we need and stop producing what we don't.
The rationalizations people go to defending Apple are just amazing.You Probably have the most logical post in this thread. Apple is very environmentally conscious, and I suspect a lot of these accessories that are not used, just end in the garbage anyways. [Or], they sit in a drawer for years and then end up in the garbage at some point.
The trade-off being, if Apple can reduce the price of the phone or supplement some other advantage with the accessories being removed, then it’s a win-win for everyone from my perspective.
So most vehicles on the road are USB-A.
I hope you're right 😞The wire will most certainly not be usb c if they aren’t including the charger.
Do we know the price just won't be reduced by $25? That's all Apple really has to do, pick a price point, then reduce it by $25. If you need the extra stuff, the price goes back to the "regular" price. That's the only smart way for them to do it.I wouldn’t put it past them. Phil will tout the environmental benefits of slimmer packaging and then say for only $20 you can get this great USB-C fast charger.
Then you should be in favor of Apple not releasing new phones every year.Good. I don't need to be contributing to more eWaste in our landfills.
Yup, you'd think they could at least wait until something happens before the whining gets to 11. Hopefully Apple learned from their display stand PR and does this right.Over here there was a whole crowd complaining about the pile of chargers they have:
![]()
EU Lawmakers Vote Overwhelmingly in Favor of Common Charging Standard, Despite Apple's Protestations [Updated]
Despite criticism from Apple, EU lawmakers on Thursday voted overwhelmingly in favor for new rules to establish a common charger for all mobile device makers across Europe (via Reuters). The Commission should adopt new rules by July, the lawmakers' resolution said, calling for "an urgent need...forums.macrumors.com
Now there’s a crowd complaining that Apple might not give them another one.
Just goes to show that it doesn’t matter what the article is about, someone will be able to find a reason to rage post about Apple being evil and wrong...
well I don't care about that. go on and fight capitalism. but if you can afford a thousand dollars gadget and complain about the price of accessories, I'm glad you're not in charge of taking those kind of decisions.Genius! Keep raising the pricing on the phone and accessories. People will still buy it kicking/screaming asking can I have some more?
What the h*** do I do with usb-c, with six usb-a bricks?
Pretty simple. They can’t make airpods battery removable and also make the device small. It is basically a system in a chip. Everything including the battery is build into it. That’s what enabled the amazing size to features to battery life ratio. It’s was an impossible feet of engines when it was released that took years for the competition to copy. And all you can do is complain about it?Why don't they make another ecological move and make the airpods serviceable by allowing the batteries to be replaced by Apple and thus increasing the life of the product. Why don't they make another ecological move by launching new smartphones once every 2-3 years. Surely they are aware that for some people their products are a shiny status symbol and they will upgrade every year even if by now the smartphone design has matured and the new features are small improvements rather than big breakthroughs? And the list can go on and on.
The Stockholm syndrome sounds absurd until you read some of the posts on this website.