Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-gb) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/8C148)
You could argue that if you read into it something that wasn't actually said.
anubis said:On the one hand, if the guy was simply suing because his phone broke after he dropped it, it would be ridiculous. On the other, you do have to admit how the claims of "30x harder and 20x stiffer than plastic" could easily be interpreted to mean that the glass is 20x or 30x less prone to cracking than plastic when dropped, and if you had an all-plastic phone it probably wouldn't break with a 3-foot drop.
You could argue that if you read into it something that wasn't actually said.