Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I can see it now:

AppleCare: "Hello, Applecare how can I help you?".

Customer :"ya my battery life stinks sometimes"

AppleCare :"sir, it sounds like you may be holding it wrong"
FWIW, every cell phone I have ever owned had lousy battery life when held over the antenna. In fact, all of them have specifically stated in the owner manual to avoid holding the phone over the antenna area to improve battery life. Difference was that the antenna was usually housed in the top 1/3 of the phone, where it can no longer be placed due to regulations in some countries.
 
Of course, with a case, you can have an iP4 that is functionally as it would have been with an internal antenna. The difference is, of course, the affect of the case on the appearance of the device.

Considering most use a case anyway the whole complaint is mute and Apple is going to GIVE everybody a free case. Jeez the world is full of whiners ( not directed at you )

It is good to see that some people are not drinking the kool aid.

Especially fact filled kool aid?

FWIW, every cell phone I have ever owned had lousy battery life when held over the antenna. In fact, all of them have specifically stated in the owner manual to avoid holding the phone over the antenna area to improve battery life. Difference was that the antenna was usually housed in the top 1/3 of the phone, where it can no longer be placed due to regulations in some countries.

Never noticed that, but then again I never read the manual on a cell phone.
 
The day after I got my iPhone 3G, I tested the 3G connection using speedtest. I found out that the up/down rate was less than half as fast when holding the phone in my hand vs leaving it on the table. But I still used it for nearly 2 years.

My iPhone 4 doesn't have this problem.
 
The day after I got my iPhone 3G, I tested the 3G connection using speedtest. I found out that the up/down rate was less than half as fast when holding the phone in my hand vs leaving it on the table. But I still used it for nearly 2 years.

My iPhone 4 doesn't have this problem.

Facts have never stopped the press from ignoring them.
 
I think it's stupid because I have never heard of anyone buying anything related to consumer reports. All they don is judge, I'd like to see them be as creative as apple and make something instead of just judging apple, like they even matter.

:rolleyes: Steve Jobs would be proud of your faithful post, a typical fan boy answer.


Didnt the iPhone 4 sell like a few million already? Seriously consumer reports if you can do better than make something instead of judging on your high horse.

That is just plain idiotic, I don't know if i cant explain it in such a simplistic way for you to be able to understand. CR is not in business to create products but to review. Apple has used CR reviews in it's own training material. Your opinion of CR is not based on anything other than apple fanboyism. If CR recommended it people like you would be proclaiming how wonderful and useful CR is. Millions of people use CR for their reviews, for thousands of products.

Jobs showed us that this problem happens in many other phones, so if you don't want an iPhone, like the song says, than don't buy one and if you do and it don't work, just bring it back. That's the way it works with everything else. At least apple is actually trying to fix the issue.:apple:


Wrong in so many ways. First he showed a video that more than a few people question. I am sure that you believe in UFOs, big foot and santa, since their is video of all three.

Second it is pathetic how apple fanboys are so willing to accept a phone that is obviously flawed, just because the master tells them it is ok. Jobs admitted that the phone is defective and tried to deflect by showing at best questionable videos of other phones. A fix would be a recall and a redesign, not a 12 cent piece of rubber.

Facts have never stopped the press from ignoring them.


Actually i think you meant facts have never stopped the fanboys from ignoring them.

Sorry dude, but attacking the messenger is not going to work this time. Consumer Reports is THE most respected consumer product review service out there. If they say not to buy the IP4 because it's defective that means something. It's not an issue of being on a "high horse", I just don't want to use a defective device and be anxious about "holding it the wrong way". But sure, keep on fanboying.

I wish more people were this intelligent. I love my 3gs but after the nightmare of the IP4 i had no choice but to take it back.
 
Considering most use a case anyway the whole complaint is mute and Apple is going to GIVE everybody a free case. Jeez the world is full of whiners ( not directed at you )

Especially fact filled kool aid?

Never noticed that, but then again I never read the manual on a cell phone.

3 consecutive post - you are very keen, aren't you?

Oh, I almost missed you...

I wish more people were this intelligent. I love my 3gs but after the nightmare of the IP4 i had no choice but to take it back.

Actually i think you meant facts have never stopped the fanboys from ignoring them.

:rolleyes: Steve Jobs would be proud of your faithful post, a typical fan boy answer.

This is the sort of stuff that some Norwegian moderator gives you a warning! (In fact, I was given two for accidentally posting consecutively. :) )
 
I wish more people were this intelligent. I love my 3gs but after the nightmare of the IP4 i had no choice but to take it back.

Actually i think you meant facts have never stopped the fanboys from ignoring them.

:rolleyes: Steve Jobs would be proud of your faithful post, a typical fan boy answer.




That is just plain idiotic, I don't know if i cant explain it in such a simplistic way for you to be able to understand. CR is not in business to create products but to review. Apple has used CR reviews in it's own training material. Your opinion of CR is not based on anything other than apple fanboyism. If CR recommended it people like you would be proclaiming how wonderful and useful CR is. Millions of people use CR for their reviews, for thousands of products.




Wrong in so many ways. First he showed a video that more than a few people question. I am sure that you believe in UFOs, big foot and santa, since their is video of all three.

Second it is pathetic how apple fanboys are so willing to accept a phone that is obviously flawed, just because the master tells them it is ok. Jobs admitted that the phone is defective and tried to deflect by showing at best questionable videos of other phones. A fix would be a recall and a redesign, not a 12 cent piece of rubber.

Yes, I saw these ones too. I reedited my post.

You don't know Apple.

It's the freaking weekend, it's not a freaking phone it's a computer that makes calls, my family is upset because I have an iPhone4 and they still have to use a 3GS.


I can see it now:

AppleCare: "Hello, Applecare how can I help you?".

Customer :"ya my battery life stinks sometimes"

AppleCare :"sir, it sounds like you may be holding it wrong"

Angry Birds is great for killing time, but clearly this thread requires less thought.

I'm going for a record.

Jesus Christ, you've had 5 before that!!! :eek:

Sir, you are breaking the rules!
 
And in time cr will lose it's audience and credibility for manipulating reports, which is already insignificant. Don't know one person who cares about cr. Not in my field.

Agreed.
There are some in this thread who have claimed Apple fanboys are attacking CR just because of the iPhone4 "non-recommendation." This is absolutely not true. CR has always been a rag, and I can't imagine anyone with any common sense putting any faith in their reports or recommendations. As I've said before, they know a little about a lot of products, but not much about anything. Want a car? Go read independent tests in Car & Driver. Want a new 3D TV? Read Sound & Vision test results. Same applies for anything else - Consumer Reports is not recognized as an authority on ANYTHING. Even if they wholeheartedly endorsed iPhone4, they would still be useless.
 
You consider dissatisfaction over the purchase of a phone a nightmare?

I consider a phone that has a design flaw backed by a company who knew about it and refuses to do a real fix for it a nightmare experience. I am not a fanboy who will defend a defective device because of my blind devotion. I will stick with my 3GS until the IP4.1 comes out and works right.
 
I'm not defending Apple's choice, merely explaining that a choice had to be made. At the time, SJ thought that the external antenna was the right choice, but now I wonder whether he regrets that decision.

Of course, with a case, you can have an iP4 that is functionally as it would have been with an internal antenna. The difference is, of course, the effect of the case on the appearance of the device.

Also how is the IP4 the most advanced antenna compared to Motorola's dual-antenna for the Droid X? Which company has a lot more experience in designing antennas?
 
Except your beloved Nexus One is one of the worst smartphones when you speak about basics like reception and battery life ...
But yeah, we trust you :D

froyo gets a reported 2 days of moderate/heavy use even with flash on, this is widely reported, and not just from me..sorry, extremely wrong here.
 
anyone attacking consumer reports credibility needs a brain check, while you're certainly entitled to your opinion, they have long been the nations most trusted consumer advocacy groups in the country. i doubt you had a problem with them raving about the previous iphone models. just cause they say it's great in all other areas and still not recommended says that apple needs to address the issue, this will go down in history as a major mistake by apple, the end.
 
Can you explain a bit further? At the moment it seems to me that you just tried to argue with me and this is all you had to pick on.

Profanity is a violation of forum rules. Seems only fair to avoid it when you're accusing someone else of breaking forum rules, no?

Agreed.
There are some in this thread who have claimed Apple fanboys are attacking CR just because of the iPhone4 "non-recommendation." This is absolutely not true. CR has always been a rag, and I can't imagine anyone with any common sense putting any faith in their reports or recommendations.

I've always found CR to be objective and fairly competent - of course their "advice" should not be deemed the final word by any diligent consumer, but it's a good reference point. I have no problem with CR's findings on the iPhone. I'm sure they are accurate. What I do have a problem with is the fact that they (nor apparently anyone else) has ever thoroughly tested other smartphones to locate the signal-destroying "weak spot" - which most phones surely have - as a subset of their testing routine and subsequently base a Recommended/Not Recommended judgment on that fact alone as they did with the iPhone 4. Nor did they point out this "flaw" may not affect most users in real-world use (a fact validated by the return and complaint numbers presented by Apple). To me the lack of objectivity in this regard reeks of a publicity stunt. And they're certainly getting loads of publicity from it. I've lost a lot of respect for the organization for that fact, though I'd love to see them prove me wrong by putting competitors' products through the equivalent testing process.

I bet they could figure out how to kill reception on the Droid X if they really tried...

And while there were reports of the Nexus One facing a similar fate as the iPhone 4, I don't recall hearing about it on CNN, the New York Times, Oprah, via President Obama's Address to the Nation, printed from leaflets being dropped from the sky, scrolling across my TV screen as a test of the emergency broadcast system...

Only Apple, it seems, merits this kind of scrutiny. Or Apple's competitors' PR departments are impressively skilled in the art of FUD...
 
Exactly. And it would seem that it's only an issue for ATT owners as there are no multiple complaints from outside the US. Perhaps a handful in large metro areas in Europe (I imagine London might have a couple of trouble areas) but that's all.

And this just supports that this is more a carrier issue than some fictitious "major design flaw"



$100 million and with a great antenna, ATT is still screwing up and folks are still blaming it on Apple.




That makes no sense at all. I think you were trying to say that those that called Applecare to say their phones aren't working are stupid? yes.

Well your comment is actually the stupid one. Apple didn't say that some phones could be defective. Sure they can't. It's just part of making electronics. It happens. And yes folks should call Applecare or go to a store.

What they said was that their data just doesn't support the notion that this is an ISSUE (ie a major design F-up). Because if it was, the numbers would be much higher.



Because no one has called into question their testing methods. It passed the FCC etc. And unlike Consumer Reports who was called out less than 6 hours after their big study was published for having faulty testing methods (leaving the issue of the sampling aside), no one has jumped up to say the same for Apple. And given all the hype if there was reason, they would



Because there is no flaw. What is happening is part of the unfortunate side effects of the rules on cell phone tech. All phones have things that decade the signal, be it fingers, building walls, etc. All phones lose reception etc.

Even Consumer Reports said 'areas of weak reception' and nothing about those in good or great reception. Implying that whatever is happening is a total non issue for the latter folks



Not the bad press, but rather the response. Because the presence of the 'bad press' will lead to many sources posting the news story that Apple responded to them etc. If your trusted news source gives a thumbs up to that reply, then for many that's all it takes to be convinced that the bad press was just sour grapes



maybe with other things, but for many especially in the US, your cell phone is THE phone in your life. So if it is not working, you will have it serviced, return it etc right away.



There will possibly be a spike over the next couple of weeks. Due to those in crappy ATT areas getting the message that crappy ATT is not going to be all that less crappy just cause they got a hip cool phone. So if Verizon is the great carrier in that area, that's who they should be using and yeah it sucks that they can't have the cool phone etc.

But there's no reason to believe that the spike will be that huge given that the issue isn't a design flaw at all and thus effects a small group. Or lasting since those in crap zones won't buy the phone after all (and many of those that don't know will be more careful to find out before switching phones and/or carriers)



We might. It all depends on whether that number still falls within Apple and the Government's acceptable range of defect.

These types of devices are complex and even the most perfect design will have problems with manufacturing issues. A screw isn't set perfectly tight, a sim card is punched slightly too small, Fed Ex drops the box and a tiny wire way inside snaps. and so on.

So long as the amount is small enough to be negligible, no serious injury or death occurs and the company makes good on repairing and or replacing, it's just part of the game.



Because Apple isn't responsible for fixing ATTs network.

there's nothing to fix in the phone itself. If there was we would see a lot more reports, especially coming from areas with the best ATT coverage. And Consumer Reports wouldn't have added that weak reception comment etc.

The iphone 4, while of course not perfect, is not flawed. The design is solid. It's the other side that has the problems.



Yeah and? Are you shocked that the compet didn't like having it called out that they aren't perfect either.




Exactly, the two are not the same thing.

To go back to my friends room analogy. You and I can start off shouting and depending on the noise in the room we can drop to a normal voice and be fine. Or we can start off standing next to each other and move apart and be fine. Or not. If more people are coming in the room.



I don't trust them to give out the numbers because of the fear that some folks will take any number that they deem high as 'you are crap' and either leave or not sign up. For example, 100k drops a month sounds huge to the uninformed, even if it might be out of a 1000 times that in attempts. ATT won't risk it.



It doesn't always mean they screwed with the numbers (perhaps the interpretation). They just don't want to give them out and that is the standard shut you down code phrase. Because as you said your own company knows that phrase etc.



Well sure. But the wise and considerate man looks at all the factors rather than knee jerking on one party. Because Apple made the phone, they carry the weight of a lot of the issues when it's not always on them. To their credit they make good on many of those issues because it's just not worth the time and energy.
The bumpers are a good example. The perception is out there, thanks to the media, that this bars issue is a major deal and that a case is the answer. Rather than waste time trying to convince the masses, Apple is just giving folks free bumpers. Why not, it's not really going to cost them that much since the silly things are like 10 cents to make and maybe another 5 cents to package. Come Sept 30th they will likely just have the bumpers in the box. You get a black one for free and if you want a color you have to buy it on your own.



I"m way younger than 53 but I do read Consumer Reports. However I read it with my brain on. I don't just blindly follow anyone. No matter the 'rep'. Which is also why I'm not holding my breath on my next Mac coming with a Blu-ray drive.



Exactly. If you are in a crappy service area anything is going to make it worse. If you are in a good or great area, it rarely to never matters what you do.



They are not NOW willing to refund your money. They have given a full refund on the phones since the first 3g came out. With an extended return period of a couple of days over double the standard 2 weeks, to be in line with ATT's no ETF period. And no restocking fee since they open the phone before they let you take it out of the store.

with the first iphone, there was a restocking fee although I remember reports of folks saying the managers waived it if you were returning it cause ATT sucked in your area.

The antenna design is flawed.

You must be a very bored kid to waste an entire day on this ridiculous post.... Or maybe you're just grounded. Maybe someday when your guardian let's you try his phone you will realize how bad the reception is due to Apple's failure to do their due diligence.
 
I want the white iphone. I don't care what CR says. I don't care...I don't care...I don't care...I don't care...I don't care... :D

Everybody, lighten up.
 
Profanity is a violation of forum rules. Seems only fair to avoid it when you're accusing someone else of breaking forum rules, no?

Is writing Jesus Christ really considered profanity in the US?

What I do have a problem with is the fact that they (nor apparently anyone else) has ever thoroughly tested other smartphones to locate the signal-destroying "weak spot" - which most phones surely have -

If it was the same issue that all phones have, you shouldn't be able to fix it by insulating the antenna with a piece of tape. This very simple fact escapes an awful lot of people. It's like watching the stages of grief at work.
 
The antenna design is flawed.

You must be a very bored kid to waste an entire day on this ridiculous post.... Or maybe you're just grounded. Maybe someday when your guardian let's you try his phone you will realize how bad the reception is due to Apple's failure to do their due diligence.

Just put a stupid bumper on it and it has the best reception in the industry. It is quite hard to call something flawed when it is better than it's competition.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.