dillacom said:WEll, I did oreder a MBP last week. The online store said 1-3 days till shipment, I got the email saying expected ship date Nov. 3rd....
hmmmmmmm....
noservice2001 said:confused... isn't it already intel core 2 duo?
dillacom said:I do doubt it would happen but hey I wouldn't mind. as I spec'd it out online while I was talking to the edu sales rep he said that his computer said 3 weeks. They are not ever told anything about new releases so he was confused why his showed taking so long as mine was 1-3 days. and still is today
baxterbrittle said:I'm thinking in the next week we will see at least one if not both models updated with C2D. Who am I to make predictions? Nobody ever listens to me anyway so there you have it - C2D's within 1 week.
PWNDClimbingTheLog said:How to waste time:
1) read a thread you don't have interest in
2) complain about it
3) ask if anyone else is doing the same thing
aly said:On the point of 3rd Nov ship dates, over the last month or so people have reported being shipped products long before the estimated ship date. Though your right the dates do align with what the stars are telling us![]()
Izaro said:C2D, 4mb L2cache, 4Gb RAM, 250GB HD @ 7200rpm (perhaps a little ambitious..), Apple version of SR chipset/front side bus running at 1Ghz, please ............. oh, and a graphics card worthy of the above!
ariechel said:2. 250GB notebook (2.5") HDs don't exist (and certainly not 7200RPM 250 GB notebook HDs). At present the biggest notebook HDs available are 160GB in size and run at 5400RPM.
They just don't want to get stuck with stock. They're no more informed then us.honeyshape said:I've been trying to get a macbook from Micro Anvika in London (has business ac with them) for the last few weeks. Today when I asked when they will have more in stock I was told they are waiting for the new macbooks???
ariechel said:1. Based on experience with the iMac, Apple's policy seems to be not to sell systems with more RAM than will be available to applications. Until Santa Rosa arrives, the maximum RAM available to applications looks to be 3.2GB. Since I don't think that Apple will develop its own chipset (due to the high cost of developing, producing, and supporting an independent chipset), I predict that no Macbook Pro will be offered with more than 3GB until Santa Rosa arrives next year.
2. 250GB notebook (2.5") HDs don't exist (and certainly not 7200RPM 250 GB notebook HDs). At present the biggest notebook HDs available are 160GB in size and run at 5400RPM.
3. Since I think it is very unlikely that Apple will develop its own chipset (as mentioned above) and even Santa Rose will introduce only a 800MHz FSB, I think you can also forget the 1000MHz FSB chipset.
good question, i wonder this myself. maybe lighter? thinner? black? a little faster processor?BillyShears said:I'm curious... for those of you (us) that think there will be a new enclosure for the MBP: what do you think we're looking at here? I guess all the stuff from the MacBook: swappable hard drive, magnetic latch, magnetic power cord, maybe a new keyboard.
Anything else?
I can't think of how they could improve, but that's often the case. (Plus I don't own one yet, so I don't know all the little annoyances.)
ShnikeJSB said:Actualyl, Fujitsu just announced a 200GB 2.5" SATA drive (model #MHV2200BT). It is only 4200 RPM and slow as hell. http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/10/12/fujitsus_mhv2200bt/
I don't understand, with the advent of perpendicular recording, why we don't have 200+GB 7200RPM drives! I have a 100GB 7200RPM HD that has been out since I bought my laptop (circa May 2005). 1-1/2 years later, it is STILL the largest capacity 7200RPM 2.5" HD out there. WTF???