Last I checked, it had been integrated only into the top line Ultrabooks, and PalmSecure was sold as a separate product.At what cost?
Maybe it has changed by now.
Last I checked, it had been integrated only into the top line Ultrabooks, and PalmSecure was sold as a separate product.At what cost?
Anytime anyone says 'I want touchscreen laptop' all I can think about is this
![]()
Past performances and situations don't guarantee future results....KodakCheck out thread below. From 2008 when unibody Macs were announced. Lots of complaints, including about pricing.
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/apple-announces-new-aluminum-macbooks.580479/
You've used it extensively in order to come to this conclusion, right?
Very cool, but I wonder how much it will actually be leveraged since desktop users don't have that functionality ... and many people on a desktop computer will never resort to using a tethered keyboard.
People call anything new a gimmick until they try it. It's just a fear of new things, and of course to score internet points because everyone knows it's cool to hate things on the internet.
The reality of it is none of these people commenting on here have even tried using it yet, and when they eventually do I bet most will of them will love it.
I don't have to.
I never look at my keyboard.
Muscle memory.
Every time I will have to look down and check WHAT is it that I'm pressing OR press something else to press another thing then look back up and back down again and up and down and down cause I missclicked and up sounds like a back to stoneage idea just to make sure turds buy it.
Why would I lower efficiency of my workflow?
Stupid is not my thing.
I take it you down own an iPhone then?
Very cool, but I wonder how much it will actually be leveraged since desktop users don't have that functionality ... and many people on a desktop computer will never resort to using a tethered keyboard.
it's a lame duck. It isn't needed. It doesn't solve a problem and it actually introduces problems. For anyone who works intensively with their machine it adds nothing. Even as a gimmick to sell to the wealthy casual user, I think it is underwhelming.
You've used it extensively in order to come to this conclusion, right?
I don't have to.
I never look at my keyboard.
Muscle memory.
Every time I will have to look down and check WHAT is it that I'm pressing OR press something else to press another thing then look back up and back down again and up and down and down cause I missclicked and up sounds like a back to stoneage idea just to make sure turds buy it.
Why would I lower efficiency of my workflow?
Stupid is not my thing.
LOL.
Microsoft ribbon is rubbish.
There are guidelines about what goes where, so I would guess that the controls you actually need while touch-typing would be where you expect them to be.
Sorry you lost me on the first line.
Because you have no idea what I am talking about.
I guess PRO for you means shopping on amazon.
I never look at the keyboard. WHY would I go backwards and slow down my workflow?
The touch bar is silly. As a designer I want to interact with my models on screen. Making my Wacom tablet obsolete. As much as I love Mac, maybe it's time to let go. The Surface studio and book have so much more potential.
End of the day you've not even used it so your opinion is void. Sorry.
True, good find. But the complaining is much less than this time around.
There were many negative and many positive voices in the thread you posted. Now it's only negative (95%).
ok...but what's the limit of the price people are gonna get mad? Steve Jobs $10k's NEXT?Check out thread below. From 2008 when unibody Macs were announced. Lots of complaints, including about pricing.
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/apple-announces-new-aluminum-macbooks.580479/
Why so serious? I for one think that a touch bar with different dick emoji's will increase production 100 fold.My God, have a sense of humour, please. You all sound so serious around here.
I do. I clean it by rubbing it on my shirt-belly several times a day.I take it you don't own an iPhone then?
This would be immense, expensive, but immense. The iPad Pro is 6.9mm 'thin' with a brilliant display and touch interface. Design a connection that would allow a Mac to drive the display and use the touch input and you'd really get the best of both worlds.Microsoft is not stupid anymore....Apple should combine (various sizes): A detachable screen with the iPad (iOS) components in the back of it and a keyboard with a MacBook (macOS) underneath. The best combo: 2 in 1. iOS and macOS should stay individual but combine on apps that require that. In the end, you need the iPad (switch a button for the iOS system), you take the screen (with a pen, eventually) and do your stuff. You need the MacBook power and its specific apps, you attach the screen to keyboard (MacBook) switch the button for macOS and go on. You need both operating systems on the same display on apps that work together, you can use the split screen or underneath connections between systems. Of course, things can go more complex and they need to figure out the best links between them. No cannibalisation. This very simplistic view can go big. That should be the future. Not the gimmicks we see today. Apart from this, they will see a boom in apps created by developers for both environments. Than you can sell it to me starting at $2.500 in any sizes you think is proper.
This would be immense, expensive, but immense. The iPad Pro is 6.9mm 'thin' with a brilliant display and touch interface. Design a connection that would allow a Mac to drive the display and use the touch input and you'd really get the best of both worlds.
Alternatively have a native 'trackpad' mode for the iPad that would turn it into a context aware second screen/tablet input for MacOS with, if you're using an iPad Pro, full Apple Pencil support!
So many posts with pixel fixation on 13-15 inch screens. Do these people not see the significant improvements made over the existing excellent display? Pixel density is only one factor among many in image quality. I think I will go look at it next to some other machines? Maybe they tested the available technology and chose image quality over a number?And sorry a machine which costs 2.000 bucks + should have a 4k display in 2016.