The more things change, the more they stay the same.--Alphonse Karr
As expected, there’s no benefit to viewers other than the ability to stream to mobile devices. Otherwise, it’s the same business model as traditional cable tv… the few channels you want bundled with half-ass networks that have only one noteworthy program each. Don’t have kids in your household? Too bad. You still have to pay for a half dozen kid channels. Don’t follow politics? Too bad. There’s three C-SPAN channels anyway. Ask yourself… are the few channels you will watch, worth $35+ a month? And that price… it’s very temporary. Content providers raise their costs yearly. In turn, AT&T will raise their price.
I think its a step in the right direction. First you get away from companies gouging you with equipment rental fees and other added fees and taxes. You're also not bound by a contract so you can freely switch around without worrying about returning equipment or whether your neighborhood is even equipped for service. Hopefully this will help keep them a little honest since people can switch around in a heartbeat. I'm sure other things will change over time as more and more people move in this direction. I think a la carte would be way too expensive, you'd probably end up paying the same price if not more for a small group of channels you actually want. I mean look at cbs... they want to charge you 5-10 bucks for 1 channel, a channel that I can watch for free with an HD antenna.