naw, his vision must be 'more than perfect' cause... those of us with poor vision noticed ALL the UI issues immediately 🤣
As far as I can tell, the app writes com.apple.SwiftUI.DisableSolarium YES in the preference file of the app (~/Library/Preferences/com.apple.Music.plist)I don't see any specifics on the Readme. Curious how it might compare with simply adjusting Setting (Reduce Trans/Adj Contrast/etc)?
defaults write -g com.apple.SwiftUI.DisableSolarium -bool YES
defaults delete -g com.apple.SwiftUI.DisableSolarium
I triedand nothing looked different AFACIT until I came upon this.Code:defaults write -g com.apple.SwiftUI.DisableSolarium -bool YES
I’m 77,and I love it!I'm convinced that age and length of experience with Mac is a factor here.
I know of nobody (ages 40-65) that likes this design direction for the Mac specifically.
I’m 77,and I love it!
I know of nobody (ages 40-65) that likes this design direction for the Mac specifically.
I am 53 and I like liquid glass flawed as it is now.That's great!
That's outside the range I mentioned though.
![]()
I hope I'm correct in thinking Apple has included these to assist those with reading impairments because, honestly, it's a waste of space having only some commands visualised.
The menu icons are recipe for inconsistencies, there are way way more when you start to look for them.View attachment 2564774
What's the consensus with these menus? I just think they look absolutely ridiculous with some items having icons, others not.
View attachment 2564776
Why does Settings - the most clear and obvious command to have a 'cog' graphic - not have one, yet the Finder one does?
I hope I'm correct in thinking Apple has included these to assist those with reading impairments because, honestly, it's a waste of space having only some commands visualised.
This should be an Accessibility option; a toggle in Settings to turn them on or off.
I'm convinced that age and length of experience with Mac is a factor here.
I know of nobody (ages 40-65) that likes this design direction for the Mac specifically.
Settings doesn't have a cog icon because they used a double cog icon for Services. Of course, Services is a Menu header for a submenu and shouldn't have an icon anyway. There are simply far too many inconsistencies to list, and no obvious style guide for when a menu item should have an icon or not. It's a dog's breakfast. 🙃View attachment 2564774
What's the consensus with these menus? I just think they look absolutely ridiculous with some items having icons, others not.
View attachment 2564776
Why does Settings - the most clear and obvious command to have a 'cog' graphic - not have one, yet the Finder one does?
I hope I'm correct in thinking Apple has included these to assist those with reading impairments because, honestly, it's a waste of space having only some commands visualised.
This should be an Accessibility option; a toggle in Settings to turn them on or off.
I triedand nothing looked different AFACIT until I came upon this.Code:defaults write -g com.apple.SwiftUI.DisableSolarium -bool YES
View attachment 2564457
put it back to normal.Code:defaults delete -g com.apple.SwiftUI.DisableSolarium
oh so this setting reverts to the disgusting center-aligned alert dialogs (not to mention UI glitches). it's worse than useless then.
Tim Cook disagrees with you (he's 64 currently).
I seriously doubt Cook gives one single flying [beep] what macOS looks like. Tell him how to squeeze 0.5 cents more out of the next iPhone production? That's where he gets excited.
We have a spreadsheet person in retirement age leading Apple, and it shows.
What's wrong with centre-aligned dialogues?