The way I took it is they're uploading an encrypted safety voucher with each photo that is uploaded to iCloud, then those safety vouchers are checked. Apple has no idea what your photo library looks like UNTIL a threshold of 30 photos is met and then and only then are those 30 photos visible to them to check for the unlikelyhood of 30 false positives.I think the difference is everyone (including Apple, was) are doing it on server side. Nobody was doing it on the phone side until now, pioneered by Apple. Imo that's the issue that many people are having. It's one thing to scan what's on their own server. But to go into the user's phone and do the scan there and code in the hashes into the OS for all iPhones worldwide? That's a bit much.
Doesn't matter if you get flagged. If there's nothing illegal, they won't report it to authorities and if they do somehow report innocent photos to authorities, then they'll just go... yeah, there's nothing wrong about those photos. There must've been an error.Not sure yet. I don’t use iCloud to store photos so don’t know if I’m affected. If it scans the pictures on the phone locally (I’ve heard some reputable people saying it can create hashes of your photos locally & compare to the CSAM database ) then it does make me think twice.
Really don’t buy the argument that if your photos are ok you will be too. I guess I just don’t trust the algorithms that hash the images.
and I do worry that it would be easy for a junk app to add something to your phone to get you flagged !
You do realize when you use Siri, those recordings are processed on Apple's servers right?My employer gets to monitor what I have on my company owned device. They own them, and pay me to do that. They can do that what they want with their device.
Why would Apple get the same benefit on MY PERSONAL devices? They are just the manufacturer. They forfeit any ownership of my device when I paid for it (with a good chunk of change). What's next? All cars will be outfit with microphones that the car manufacturer will hear all the time so that they can determine if I'm a kidnapper?
Except they just announced to change direction by 180 degreesNot at all. Apple takes privacy really seriously and there's no evidence to believe that they've changed their thinking on that.
How so? Your data is still private.Except they just announced they changed direction by 180 degrees
Its not. Its accessed and assessed by an entity that is not me. My data are noone elses business and shall not be accessed by anyone but me. It certainly shall not be assessing my private dataHow so? Your data is still private.
I'm sorry to say, but your data isn't 100% safe when storing it on someone else's server. That server can get hacked. The likely hood of your individual device being hacked is much less likely to occur. It's more secure, not less.Its not. Its accessed and assessed by an entity that is not me. My data are noone elses business and shall not be accessed or assessed by anyone but me
Here's a guy that gets it.I've got nothing Apple would be interested in on my 12 Pro, but now that they've opened the door to "privacy", I've purchased a Synology NAS with my own personal cloud. Works seamlessly.
Good. I think everyone that has a problem with Apple's software should do this. Vote with your wallet. Make them lose customers! Teach them a lesson! That's the only way they'll learn that we won't accept this.I won’t update until I’m forced to.
In the meantime, I have stopped using iCloud completely…no photos, no emails, no calendar….nada. I now backup locally and have canceled my iCloud subscription. I’m also canceling Apple TV just because I feel like it.
Yeap, but then I decide when to trigger Siri, have listen to Hey Siri and everything like that disabled. If they're listening, means they are complying with how they told me it worked.....more reason to distrust them.You do realize when you use Siri, those recordings are processed on Apple's servers right?
In the same exact sense, since you’re trusting them with the way Siri works, why not trust them in the way this works as well? Turning off iCloud Photo Library completely disabled this hashing process because unless the photo is being uploaded, it’s not scanned or hashed.Yeap, but then I decide when to trigger Siri, have listen to Hey Siri and everything like that disabled. If they're listening, means they are complying with how they told me it worked.....more reason to distrust them.
Google and Apple have been scanning for CSAM on their online services for years....
Its on the device. Its gonna be activated even when iCoud is off, its just a question of time.Again, if you don't want to be a part of that 1 in a trillion statistic of having 30+ false positives and having those 30 innocent photos viewed by Apple, then simply don't participate in iCloud Photos or throw away your device. You either trust Apple with your content or you don't. Don't simply say you trusted them up until this point because they haven't done anything wrong.
Dell XPS Developer Edition (Running Ubuntu) and Pixel 5 (flashed with GrapheneOS)What will you be getting as replacements?
I thought they could scan your photos even with that feature disabled?Never used iCloud photos…so there’s that. So yeah…
You say that like it’s a guarantee, but you have no idea if that will happen.Its on the device. Its gonna be activated even when iCoud is off, its just a question of time.
Of course there is some truth to it.You say that like it’s a guarantee, but you have no idea if that will happen.
Apple could erase everyone’s iPhone if they wanted to, that doesn’t mean they will.