Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I think the difference is everyone (including Apple, was) are doing it on server side. Nobody was doing it on the phone side until now, pioneered by Apple. Imo that's the issue that many people are having. It's one thing to scan what's on their own server. But to go into the user's phone and do the scan there and code in the hashes into the OS for all iPhones worldwide? That's a bit much.
The way I took it is they're uploading an encrypted safety voucher with each photo that is uploaded to iCloud, then those safety vouchers are checked. Apple has no idea what your photo library looks like UNTIL a threshold of 30 photos is met and then and only then are those 30 photos visible to them to check for the unlikelyhood of 30 false positives.
 
Not sure yet. I don’t use iCloud to store photos so don’t know if I’m affected. If it scans the pictures on the phone locally (I’ve heard some reputable people saying it can create hashes of your photos locally & compare to the CSAM database ) then it does make me think twice.

Really don’t buy the argument that if your photos are ok you will be too. I guess I just don’t trust the algorithms that hash the images.

and I do worry that it would be easy for a junk app to add something to your phone to get you flagged !
Doesn't matter if you get flagged. If there's nothing illegal, they won't report it to authorities and if they do somehow report innocent photos to authorities, then they'll just go... yeah, there's nothing wrong about those photos. There must've been an error.
 
My employer gets to monitor what I have on my company owned device. They own them, and pay me to do that. They can do that what they want with their device.

Why would Apple get the same benefit on MY PERSONAL devices? They are just the manufacturer. They forfeit any ownership of my device when I paid for it (with a good chunk of change). What's next? All cars will be outfit with microphones that the car manufacturer will hear all the time so that they can determine if I'm a kidnapper?
You do realize when you use Siri, those recordings are processed on Apple's servers right?
 
I've got nothing Apple would be interested in on my 12 Pro, but now that they've opened the door to "privacy", I've purchased a Synology NAS with my own personal cloud. Works seamlessly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jayson A
Its not. Its accessed and assessed by an entity that is not me. My data are noone elses business and shall not be accessed or assessed by anyone but me
I'm sorry to say, but your data isn't 100% safe when storing it on someone else's server. That server can get hacked. The likely hood of your individual device being hacked is much less likely to occur. It's more secure, not less.

Again, if you don't want to be a part of that 1 in a trillion statistic of having 30+ false positives and having those 30 innocent photos viewed by Apple, then simply don't participate in iCloud Photos or throw away your device. You either trust Apple with your content or you don't. Don't simply say you trusted them up until this point because they haven't done anything wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: alpi123
Nope, I’ll still grab the 13. Do I worry this creates a slippery slope? Yes but I still feel my privacy is more secure than on a android device at this point so I’m fine. Maybe with iOS 16 that’ll change
 
I won’t update until I’m forced to.
In the meantime, I have stopped using iCloud completely…no photos, no emails, no calendar….nada. I now backup locally and have canceled my iCloud subscription. I’m also canceling Apple TV just because I feel like it.
 
I won’t update until I’m forced to.
In the meantime, I have stopped using iCloud completely…no photos, no emails, no calendar….nada. I now backup locally and have canceled my iCloud subscription. I’m also canceling Apple TV just because I feel like it.
Good. I think everyone that has a problem with Apple's software should do this. Vote with your wallet. Make them lose customers! Teach them a lesson! That's the only way they'll learn that we won't accept this.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: JBGoode and Pummers
You do realize when you use Siri, those recordings are processed on Apple's servers right?
Yeap, but then I decide when to trigger Siri, have listen to Hey Siri and everything like that disabled. If they're listening, means they are complying with how they told me it worked.....more reason to distrust them.
 
Yeap, but then I decide when to trigger Siri, have listen to Hey Siri and everything like that disabled. If they're listening, means they are complying with how they told me it worked.....more reason to distrust them.
In the same exact sense, since you’re trusting them with the way Siri works, why not trust them in the way this works as well? Turning off iCloud Photo Library completely disabled this hashing process because unless the photo is being uploaded, it’s not scanned or hashed.
 
Google and Apple have been scanning for CSAM on their online services for years....

So first some verified proof that Apple is scanning people’s photos online would have to be presented to me. But then secondly, it would have to be explained to me why, if that’s the case, that they now need to do what they are planning in iOS 15 if they are already scanning for things on their online services.

Can you explain that?
 
Again, if you don't want to be a part of that 1 in a trillion statistic of having 30+ false positives and having those 30 innocent photos viewed by Apple, then simply don't participate in iCloud Photos or throw away your device. You either trust Apple with your content or you don't. Don't simply say you trusted them up until this point because they haven't done anything wrong.
Its on the device. Its gonna be activated even when iCoud is off, its just a question of time.

Oh yes, they have done something wrong: they built a snitch into their operating system, despite their sales pitch promising to protect privacy. Now they do the exact opposite. And they make promises they MUST be aware they cannot keep, which is pretty dishonest and is suspicious regarding their intentions
 
Last edited:
You say that like it’s a guarantee, but you have no idea if that will happen.

Apple could erase everyone’s iPhone if they wanted to, that doesn’t mean they will.
Of course there is some truth to it.

My problem with mentioned feature is: activation/deactivation is a question of policy, not capability. Plus the whole system makes no sense considering iCloud Photos only, since they could do it on server.
It looks like the feature has been developed with local scanning in mind - and they pulled back. due to the ensuing outcry

So the capability is there, pressure will be there and considering the above I fully expect this to be rolled out for all photos, iCloud and local, once the dust has settled. The probability is high imo

But yes, you are right, that part is of course speculation. We‘ll know when they announce it (or not)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.