Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
As company is not valued by its bank balance, but by the products, services and innovations it offers the world.. Whenever an ifan feels Apple's offerings are sub par, they instantly resort to quoting balance sheets which is redic as that has no bearing to the man in the street..
A company is literally valued by its share price times its number of shares. I'm not trying to make a statement about doing good. Yeah, I think Tesla helps the world more than Apple does. I wasn't saying anything about that.
 
Yeah you sound less like a "fanboy" and more like someone who has an odd chip on their shoulder over the Apple Watch. Really. Apple Watch is classic Apple. Not sure where you got these ideas that it was somehow going to save the world. I can promise you that it most certainly has helped people even without all of the things you apparently believe it must have to be relevant. It wasn't marketed as the end-all of health monitors: it was/is marketed as a fitness device (among other things). It works really well in that use case. I know, I have one and bought it specifically for that purpose. Is it perfect? No. Will it get better? Yes. Just like with any of the other recent Apple 1.0 devices. They still did it better at 1.0 than anyone else has.

And you gave me a good laugh continuing with that silly thing about "you can track your heart rate with a finger". Well no ****. Theoretically in a hospital they could do the same thing but they put those silly clips on your finger instead because it's automatic. And how exactly would the Apple Watch do blood pressure monitoring? Anyone who claimed it would do that was smoking something *really* good.


I am a fanboy, I just happen to really hate Tim Cook and think he is doing a terrible job, Even Jony said Jobs left a road map of where Apple is going for years to come I would imagine that the Apple Watch was his idea and all, Tim is doing nothing at Apple but still following the road map of jobs he is nothing more than an errand boy trying to maximise money. While incredibly talented people around Tim make products - you think Tim Cook could have come up with an iPhone or Mac? Hell no, he is a business man and look where that got Apple before. And yes I agree with you, Apple Watch is v.1 AS I SAID, it has potential, that's what I meant the watch now, IS terrible is doesn't do much that say a 100£ Fitbit and iPhone in your pocket would t get you. But in the future - man is it going to be a game changer!! And I'm so excited about that!
As far as how would it measure your blood pressure that's a silly question really, I read in the rumours that it could have that by the strap measuring the blood flow through your wrist (I'm sure there are lots of ways this could be done, just because you can't think of a way it couldn't be done doesn't mean it couldn't have it?? What an ignorant point to make!
 
Aluminum-ion tech, like at Stanford? (Unless that's a long way off, what I've read about it would pretty much revolutionize the industry.)
Dais group you mean?
It's different. Pretty low 'capacity', so it's not for mobile electronics technology. The main point in that is that you can charge fast. It also uses carbon/graphite. Cool paper and decent technology, but atleast 10 years away of it becomes commercial for grid storage. Nothing revolutionary in my humble opinion.
 
The funny thing is that there are dozens of candidates techs (we hear about them a few times a year), but none can come out of the labs and be manufactured in volume for a good price.

So, basically better theoretical specs, but from a real world point of view, still non starters.

If your doing something for the defense department though, where money is no object, there could be things that eventually make it there. Where niche applications, where money is no object, could drive some development. That's how many things got into our lives, through military use first.

It's fascinating that not much has changed in battery technology over the years. It's like the combustion engine :p
We need something different to make tesla or similar cars a big success.
 
As company is not valued by its bank balance, but by the products, services and innovations it offers the world.. Whenever an ifan feels Apple's offerings are sub par, they instantly resort to quoting balance sheets which is redic as that has no bearing to the man in the street..
Whenever somebody is braging about Apples profit, he kinda forgets that he is the sheep thah beaner counter Tim and co. are shaving. While I understand that every company is here for profit, I belive that there is no other company that is so shameless than apple. They sell Macs that are 3x the price, yet offer way lower performance (integrated graphics card, measly 128 SSD, 4g of ram) than modern base win computer. Lets not forget ****** screens on macbook air(bleedthrough from the start, cheap panel in 1.5k euro machine), keyboard scratching screens. And with all the trouble that OS X is having for last 4 years, Win is just as good if not better (it is faster, than is not even debatable).
Further more they are keeping features for the sake of next year cycle (ram in iphone is the best example).

This is regional problem:
apple stuff is having insane price increces over last year. It just doesn't make much sense to buy some of their products (case in point: iMac 27 base model in usa is 1700 dollars, in EU its 2300 euro.... that is 2600 dollars!!!. Even with american tax added the price difference is just to much for normal person to not feel offended and like money sheep).
 
Umm, you don't just call Foxconn and have them build you a phone either. And, you might want to Google a bit and read up on how Eberhard started Tesla... and what was so key to him realizing it was a doable project.

And, while I just don't know enough about the details behind the manufacturing processes, engineering, and off-the-shelf aspects of either company... if I had to make a bet, I'd put my money on Apple doing more custom engineering work than Tesla.

True about iPhone and foxconn, I agree with you on that one.
Who is doing more engineering stuff its hard to say. I belive only insiders know what anybody actually do in-house.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SteveW928
I love both companies dearly. But I honestly side with Tesla on this one. Apple is kind of a douche for poaching high talent at another wonderful company. They've been known for doing this to Google employees, too, before they made an agreement to stop that.

We need brilliant minds at both of these companies. But if someone specializes in automobile design, I think I'd prefer them to be at Tesla! I guess that all depends, though.

Is Apple planning on making a car? Are they using car designers for inspiration towards future computer products? Will these products turn out so unimaginably beautiful that I'd make the iPhone 4 and iPhone 5 look like antiquated toys?

That all remains to be seen. But for the time being, I understand where Elon Musk is coming from. He has every right to be upset. And Apple should have more respect for themselves than poaching at Elon's company...


Also, I really doubt Apple is jumping into the car market. I highly doubt it. The amount of capital required to do that is immense. It would almost completely erode Apple's huge stock pile of money they're sitting on. Which would cut in to their ability to focus on and innovate their core products - computers, phones, mp3 players, etc.

Apple has, in the past, had car designers and engineers on their design team to help innovate industrial design for their computer products. I really just don't see them side jumping into the car-making industry. It would be too random and not very business smart.
 
Last edited:
Tesla will be flat until they can produce a car that can compete with the 100 mile choices consumers have to endure the pitiful 100 mile range!

I know Tesla fanboys will say the Model X will be that car but I don't see it being sold just yet!
 
Building cars is not rocket science.

Yeah, right. Elon Musk has a company that literally builds ****ing rocket ships. And he heads that company, AND an eco-friendly electric car company at the same time. So you're right. Building cars isn't rocket science. But building cars AND rockets? Not to mention other "small projects" like PayPay, solar city, etc.

He studied applied physics.. at Standford. He's literally a rocket scientist.

What say you to that? :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: SirCheese
This is why Tim Cook meets with heads of state, while Musk sweeps up parts of crashed rockets. He really needs to leave this kind of thing to Larry Ellison.

Elon_Musk_gives_tour_for_President_Barack_Obama.jpg



You were saying? :p
 
I honestly side with Tesla on this one. Apple is kind of a douche for poaching high talent at another wonderful company. They've been known for doing this to Google employees, too, before they made an agreement to stop that.
Except, nobody said anything like that. Elon Musk suggested Apple hires people who have been fired at Tesla in advance, hence Apple is referred to as an Tesla graveyard.
 
Except, nobody said anything like that. Elon Musk suggested Apple hires people who have been fired at Tesla in advance, hence Apple is referred to as an Tesla graveyard.
Yeah, you should learn how to read between the lines. That's not how "poaching" works. Elon, like any business savvy person, was obviously trying to save face by phrasing it that way. Poaching is seeking active employees at a company - not fired ones.
 
oh apple will build car no problem, yet they needed extra 6 months to finish watch that does nothing really. Musk was right, you can't just call foxconn and have them build you a car. They cant even fix wifi on some mac....and they will build cars?
And btw, what does apple really do? They dont manifacture or develop lcd screen, then for sure dont develop any part for Mac (cpu, gpu, ram, ssd) other than couple of controllers. Maybe they do something with mobile chips and gpu, but not really sure if they actually invent them.

Apple is quite good at manufacturing metals. http://www.aluminum.org/thank-you-steve-jobs

The Mac Pro and Apple Watch are both good examples of Apple's manufacturing prowess.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SteveW928
I am a fanboy, I just happen to really hate Tim Cook and think he is doing a terrible job, Even Jony said Jobs left a road map of where Apple is going for years to come I would imagine that the Apple Watch was his idea and all, Tim is doing nothing at Apple but still following the road map of jobs he is nothing more than an errand boy trying to maximise money. While incredibly talented people around Tim make products - you think Tim Cook could have come up with an iPhone or Mac? Hell no, he is a business man and look where that got Apple before. And yes I agree with you, Apple Watch is v.1 AS I SAID, it has potential, that's what I meant the watch now, IS terrible is doesn't do much that say a 100£ Fitbit and iPhone in your pocket would t get you. But in the future - man is it going to be a game changer!! And I'm so excited about that!
As far as how would it measure your blood pressure that's a silly question really, I read in the rumours that it could have that by the strap measuring the blood flow through your wrist (I'm sure there are lots of ways this could be done, just because you can't think of a way it couldn't be done doesn't mean it couldn't have it?? What an ignorant point to make!
I love how people who don't work at Apple and most likely don't know anybody that does work at Apple seem to think they know so much about the company. If Tim Cook is so awful, why did Steve Jobs recommend him for CEO. And how come none of his direct reports have left (besides the ones he fired)? I can't imagine they'd want to work for someone who is just a "errand boy trying to maximize money".
 
Yeah, right. Elon Musk has a company that literally builds ****ing rocket ships. And he heads that company, AND an eco-friendly electric car company at the same time. So you're right. Building cars isn't rocket science. But building cars AND rockets? Not to mention other "small projects" like PayPay, solar city, etc.

He studied applied physics.. at Standford. He's literally a rocket scientist.

What say you to that? :D

Meanwhile Steve Jobs was a poser that couldn't even write code.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SirCheese
Good grief, rocket science is a doddle compared to the engineering challenges of space flight. Tsiolkovsky, Oberth and Goddard had it basically figured out. Would people please stop referring to rocket science as some kind of pinnacle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SteveW928
Good grief, rocket science is a doddle compared to the engineering challenges of space flight. Tsiolkovsky, Oberth and Goddard had it basically figured out. Would people please stop referring to rocket science as some kind of pinnacle.

And by that extension making an iPhone is child's play.
 
Well, too early or not, they seem to have a hit, albeit an expensive one. If I had the cash, I'd buy one.

But, I agree they are early on the scene. I'm sure others will join them eventually, but by doing what they've done, they will likely be the leader in name recognition in it. As to the automotive giants being naive.... yea, naive or stupid... take your pick. (cf. VW for a current example) Not necessarily for not having electric cars... but in general. It's not like Tesla entered a competitive rapidly advancing market or anything.

re: solar panels - Well, he seems all in on everything from Global Warming to A.I. to populating distant planets. Desperate times, desperate measures I guess. That doesn't mean he actually understands those things.
Steve, just like Thasan already explained you: we are simply NOT there yet. Technology is not there. Some folks believe they can use Solar energy on their homes and charge those cars: it's foolish, expensive and time consuming. People talk about things they know nothing about. At best a solar panel will only produce like 250Wh. These cars have batteries rated at 90kWh+! (do the math: you will need 4 panels per kW or 180panels to charge the behemoth in one hour, or 360 panels to charge it in 30mins. you will also need a roof with an area of more than 600 sq. meters!!!)The sun shines according to where you are for like I don't know, 5hrs. How do you expect to charge your car at night???? Steve, the car giants are not naïve. I believe the answer will come in some sort of hydrogen fuel cell technology that is clean and will replace oil. On the other hand one can make a small and light (very light) electric car that will move in the cities and charge in your garage. This is possible. But a large sedan that is heavy and needs 500bhp this is a mistake. I predict decent solutions will once again come from VW/Mercedes/BMW/Audi. These companies have the cash and the will to make this happen.
 
Yeah, you should learn how to read between the lines. That's not how "poaching" works. Elon, like any business savvy person, was obviously trying to save face by phrasing it that way. Poaching is seeking active employees at a company - not fired ones.
So we've left reality to life in read-between-the-lines land. Good for you.
 
And by that extension making an iPhone is child's play.
Than make one and earn the billions in your own pocket. Jesus, can't Apple get any credit for what they've accomplished? Not even Google can make money with Android. But Egon Musk the rocket scientist is the smartest kid in town. Again how many satellites has Space X transported safely into orbit compared to Ariane Space?
 
Than make one and earn the billions in your own pocket. Jesus, can't Apple get any credit for what they've accomplished? Not even Google can make money with Android. But Egon Musk the rocket scientist is the smartest kid in town. Again how many satellites has Space X transported safely into orbit compared to Ariane Space?

They get plenty of credit.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.