That's what everyone says of every major financial leader historically.Another asinine comment by this dude. He’s a total whack job.
That's what everyone says of every major financial leader historically.Another asinine comment by this dude. He’s a total whack job.
Reading between the lines, he has been trying to slow OpenAI's progress here since December 2022. He wants to be known for AI, no matter what the cost...how can he be the future of humanity if he isn't the source for its AI? His motivations are all too clear and if he kept his cards closer to his chest he wouldn't be so easily dismissed. He's not looking to make sure choosing AI is like choosing a search engine, he's looking to make sure his three AI companies have a chance.I think before everyone scoffs at Musk's comment, carefully "reading between the lines" I think he wants Apple to be able to easily use other AI models like X.com's Grok, GitHub's Copilot, Google's Gemini and even Gab's Gab AI, selected by the end user.
Interestingly, they had a change of heart on scanning your library for CSAM... Sure, Apple should show how this is done - but they kind of already did that.Everyone quick to trust Apple on privacy when not too long ago they were going to scan your library for CSAM without even batting an eye. you think they had a change of heart on intrusiveness? I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell..
I think this claim of privacy should absolutely be challenged and have Apple show its work.
Yeah, no. This is more along the lines of what we said about Elizabeth Holmes.That's what everyone says of every major financial leader historically.
Look, there should be the ability of end users to select the AI model used by Apple Intelligence. In the case of MacOS, possibly multiple AI models. Even Apple themselves said they would eventually allow Apple Intelligence to use other AI models in the future.Reading between the lines, he has been trying to slow OpenAI's progress here since December 2022. He wants to be known for AI, no matter what the cost...how can he be the future of humanity if he isn't the source for its AI? His motivations are all too clear and if he kept his cards closer to his chest he wouldn't be so easily dismissed. He's not looking to make sure choosing AI is like choosing a search engine, he's looking to make sure his three AI companies have a chance.
Sure, that's you saying that, not Musk. And I wouldn't disagree.Look, there should be the ability of end users to select the AI model used by Apple Intelligence. In the case of MacOS, possibly multiple AI models. Even Apple themselves said they would eventually allow Apple Intelligence to use other AI models in the future.
Founding OpenAI doesn't mean he had the idea and built it in his garage. It was founded by Ilya Sutskever, Greg Brockman, Trevor Blackwell, Vicki Cheung, Andrej Karpathy, Durk Kingma, Jessica Livingston, John Schulman, Pamela Vagata, and Wojciech Zaremba, with Sam Altman and Elon serving on the board.Who founded OpenAI?
There is no large tech company that does more to protect their users' privacy. I have zero issue with Apple offering the use of OpenAI in the manner they describe.Interestingly, they had a change of heart on scanning your library for CSAM... Sure, Apple should show how this is done - but they kind of already did that.
I agree. This is has become part of Apple's brand, breaking that image would cost them dearly.There is no large tech company that does more to protect their users' privacy. I have zero issue with Apple offering the use of OpenAI in the manner they describe.
What in the world does that have to do with what I said?
Therein lies the question.Hmmm...
Who will claim to be smart enough to control these AI entities once they achieve singularity?
-e-e-e-e!!! Touche’Musk knows more about ai and privacy in computing than all the collective human intelligence on this board times 1000000 (just used my new iPad calculator to do that!) AI in infosec departments is a top three concern and managing its implications in the corporate world is in its nascence. I’d listen to Musk on this before I would the late night infomercial guy with the 45% margin running Apple.
It is not - it is competition for his own AI platform called GROKWait I don’t get why he will ban devices just because it has chat GPT integrated. How is this a security risk to his company?
Yeah, Apple is panicking. They were caught off guard and now they had to agreed to this deal. And for people that think otherwise, you just have to see what devices are going to get I, it’s iPhone 15 Pro and up lol. They were obviously projecting this to be released in maybe three years.This. You don’t have to like Elon Musk. But what he said and says about AI and privacy has merit. Unfortunately we live in a world that consists of binary choices. You either like someone or you hate the person. It’s stupid. OpenAI is a shady company with shady people at the helm. Look at that Sam Altman guy and the Scarlett Johansen controversy. He asked her to lend her voice, she declined, he then kinda copied/cloned her voice anyway. He then removed the clone after she threatened him with legal action. He also got fired from the company after a lead AI scientist saw something scary in relation to the evolving AI models. Then he got rehired again and the leading AI scientist left the company. The thing with companies like OpenAI is that it is developing a technology that is going to change the world in a rapid fashion, it will make the last 25 years of technological advancement feel like the Stone Age. It’s always about power and these companies are ruled by psychopaths. Your data is not safe with OpenAI and Apple was indeed caught off guard and now they are forced to make a deal with a company that lacks transparency. What could go wrong?
I mean, Apple made it very clear in the keynote that even companies that promise they aren’t storing anything do. It was really ironic how they said that but then promised how Open AI won’t do it lol.This isn't true.
Especially not in the case of Apple's integration where the data sent is never saved and OpenAI don't even get the IP.
Don't forget the only thing ever coming from Apple to ChatGPT (or the other LLMs they'll integrate) are going to be questions about things like "what's the longest giraffes neck" etc - all personal questions will handled on device. They're using the LLMs as a knowledge database nothing more.
Further what you said isn't even true about OpenAI full stop, there's lots of options to control your data, including a temporary chat where it won't be used to train models and won't appear in history. You can turn off the data training option to (I leave it on, I don't know why you wouldn't want things to get better)- you can delete all chats from account, to delete the entire account.
Yup, and all this was said in almost the same sentence. Lmao.I mean, Apple made it very clear in the keynote that even companies that promise they aren’t storing anything do. It was really ironic how they said that but then promised how Open AI won’t do it lol.
Yeah Apple is big on Privacy but just a little bit bigger at keeping their shareholders happy. LOL.Yeah, Apple is panicking. They were caught off guard and now they had to agreed to this deal. And for people that think otherwise, you just have to see what devices are going to get I, it’s iPhone 15 Pro and up lol. They were obviously projecting this to be released in maybe three years.
I mean, Apple made it very clear in the keynote that even companies that promise they aren’t storing anything do. It was really ironic how they said that but then promised how Open AI won’t do it lol.
Watch out for Open AI. That guy is not trust worthy at all.Well even if OpenAI broke the law (which would seem daft for a company so new trying to establish itself) and lied about what they were doing. They're not sent any personal data and they're not sent any IP addresses. So what exactly are they going to do with millions of questions like "how tall is the biggest giraffes" "tell me about the golden gate bridge", "what's the most expensive coffee in the world" etc.
Not a lot - it's not even good enough to train their models with.