Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Why though if consumers can get these technologies from established companies? These tech companies in America didn't get to where they are today with just Americans being the best in their field and right now Apple for example comprises of some of the best people in their fields from all over the World.

Why don't Americans build good cars that are desired in international markets rather than import luxury cars from Europe and reliable cars from Japan and Korea? 'So build better cars?' It becomes nonsensical when you apply that analogy to just about any type of product, doesn't it?
Top selling car is an American car. US is not export dependent like Germany, for example which needs the Chinese market to export BMW, Mercedes, etc.
 
Why don't Americans build good cars that are desired in international markets rather than import luxury cars from Europe and reliable cars from Japan and Korea? 'So build better cars?' It becomes nonsensical when you apply that analogy to just about any type of product, doesn't it?

LoL, apparently you were never on American street, otherwise you would not use this comparison. American streets are dominated by American cars and those imported are quite often special models made for America :) And reason is clearly visible, average European car looks like tiny model standing beside average American car.
 
If a company builds a beautiful car, but it doesn't have any rearview or side mirrors (and for the sake of argument no replacements for them like cameras, which is another can of worms anyway frankly), then the solution isn't to buy another car, it's to tell that manufacturer to **** off and do it right.


There's a fair amount of complaining going on in this report for sure, but to say that Apple "changed" already is very misleading, they did the absolute minimum they thought they could get away with, and they ignored huge swathes of the legislation they didn't agree with and started a legal fight over those clauses being against EU law instead.
My point was not to say that Apple actually "changed," but to highlight a common trend: when it comes to big tech, the reports come out after the issues have been addressed. Bureaucracy moves slower than technology, and if the EU wants to be relevant it'll need to either move quicker, be willing to do a last-minute report edit, or keep its voice out of the tech sphere (Take your pick)
 
Oh my indeed. The joke wooshed over your head, as I suspected

I simply reversed the solution proposed by the people who want Apple to control every aspect of their lives. People who believe iOS should be more open are forever being told to 'buy an android', 'make your own phone' or 'move in or out of the EU'

I see a dose of your own medicine tastes bitter.
No, quite the opposite, you missed the fact that you made a false equivalence.

The situation is not symmetric. You can't go into someone's house, ask them to change how they lay out their furniture, and if they complain, tell them to move somewhere else. But it's _perfectly fine_ to say to someone who wants to come into your house only if you change your furniture, "well if you don't like it, go somewhere else".

So the whole premise of "if you don't like what EU does to iOS, use something else" is a-priori wrong. Sure you can make that case, but it's an invalid one. So no, thank you.
 
Oh my indeed. The joke wooshed over your head, as I suspected

I simply reversed the solution proposed by the people who want Apple to control every aspect of their lives. People who believe iOS should be more open are forever being told to 'buy an android', 'make your own phone' or 'move in or out of the EU'

I see a dose of your own medicine tastes bitter.
Come on - no one who is against the DMA wants Apple "to control every aspect of their lives".

Thinking that a government regulating a platform to this extent, when it has less than 30% marketshare, isn't appropriate, especially when its main competitor has over 70% market share and does almost everything they are asking for, does not mean I want Apple to control every aspect of my life.

If the situation was reversed and Apple had 70% share, and Android 30% then the EU would have (again, from my perspective) a lot better standing to tell Apple what it can and can't do with regards to the App Store. And while I'd still be against the DMA - it's a terribly written law that goes way, way too far (even for actual monopolies like Google search) and is full of unintended consequences and actually isn't going to do what it intends to - I would be in support of making Apple open up the App Store, allowing side loading, etc.

So stop with the insults please.
 
No, quite the opposite, you missed the fact that you made a false equivalence.

The situation is not symmetric. You can't go into someone's house, ask them to change how they lay out their furniture, and if they complain, tell them to move somewhere else. But it's _perfectly fine_ to say to someone who wants to come into your house only if you change your furniture, "well if you don't like it, go somewhere else".

So the whole premise of "if you don't like what EU does to iOS, use something else" is a-priori wrong. Sure you can make that case, but it's an invalid one. So no, thank you.
The problem with your mindset, is that you only keep your mind open to your own opinion. It doesn’t matter that whatever changes Apple make are only applicable if you actually want to use them, more so, only available in a specific region. Apple is right no matter what, government is over reaching no matter what.

Many people are using the US govs methodology and the US people’s stance on government and how large or small it should be. But it’s not the US, their government or their people. An opinion on how one should be governed is generally formed on how they’re actually governed. Therefore, most people here are making false equivalences with every post.
 
LoL, apparently you were never on American street, otherwise you would not use this comparison. American streets are dominated by American cars and those imported are quite often special models made for America :) And reason is clearly visible, average European car looks like tiny model standing beside average American car.

"Domination" of American cars can vary a fair amount by U.S. region. However, of the top 25 bestselling vehicles in the U.S. in 2023, 11 were American brands, 13 were Japanese brands, and 1 was a Korean brand.

Excluding pickups (which were #1, #2, #3, #7 and #11), 7 were American, 12 were Japanese, and 1 was Korean.
 
Luckily anyone under 30 believes they deserve a good life and should never pay a dime for anything. Illegally stream everything, get free apps, free OS, free food, free music, yada yada. I'm glad I'm old and won't be around to see the outcome of the recent generations.

Apple should provide every single thing for free. So should REI. And Netflix. And Amazon. No one should ever charge for anything.

Bye world. It's happening.

It’s now people under 40. I’ve seen a 40-year-old on these fora claim that it used to be considered shameful to charge for software. The poor sot formed his view of business during the internet bubble days. Only free is moral to him, so he is profiled, bundled, sold, and fleeced.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DocMultimedia
Tesla?

And Tesla is the most valuable car company in the world by far, nobody even comes close.
BYD?
BYD sells more cars than Tesla. BYD even has factories in the US, in Illinois and California. It is Chinese, by the way.
 
LoL, apparently you were never on American street, otherwise you would not use this comparison. American streets are dominated by American cars and those imported are quite often special models made for America :) And reason is clearly visible, average European car looks like tiny model standing beside average American car.

I have been in American streets many times and am aware the cars are huge, inefficient and popular in the US only. The size of them is one of the many reasons you don’t see them outside of America apart from the rare import as they are not desirable to European and Asian markets. Being bigger isn’t necessarily a positive just to be clear, it might be over there but certainly not here.
 
Tesla?

And Tesla is the most valuable car company in the world by far, nobody even comes close.

Tesla is a recent exception in Europe and primarily because they make cheap EV’s and for a long time were the best choice. Times are changing though as German and Japanese makers invest more into the EV sector. Volkswagen Group are the biggest in the world, closely followed by Toyota btw. Tesla are 8th as of August 2024 which is impressive in itself considering they are barely 20 years old.
 
There's a fair amount of complaining going on in this report for sure, but to say that Apple "changed" already is very misleading, they did the absolute minimum they thought they could get away with, and they ignored huge swathes of the legislation they didn't agree with and started a legal fight over those clauses being against EU law instead.

It sounds like you have a handle on the situation. In other words, Apple has done everything within its rights to do.

Laws are not infallible. They are crafted by individuals for political objectives. Laws can be, and frequently are, corrupt, unjust, or compromises made to accommodate influential interest groups. Consequently, courts allow laws to be disputed and overturned. Apple is not only within its rights to challenge the DMA, it has a fiduciary responsibility to its shareholders to do so.
 
Top selling car is an American car. US is not export dependent like Germany, for example which needs the Chinese market to export BMW, Mercedes, etc.
Tesla Model Y was the best-selling car in the world in 2023, with 1.15 million sold.

Toyota was the top selling car brand in the world in 2023, with over 9 million sold. Tesla didn’t make the top 10.
 
  • Like
Reactions: koil and I7guy
Isn't it interesting that Tesla buys batteries for its cars from BYD? Simply cannot do without the Chinese...in this world anymore.
Not really. China has been a source of cheap manufacturing for a while now. I don't know what this has to do with what I said.
 
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
LoL, apparently you were never on American street, otherwise you would not use this comparison. American streets are dominated by American cars and those imported are quite often special models made for America :) And reason is clearly visible, average European car looks like tiny model standing beside average American car.

Ford is the top brand in the US, but it only narrowly beats Toyota. Looking at 2023 numbers and sticking with the top 10 car brands sold in the US, no European car makes the list. However, Japanese and Korean cars outsold American cars 5.45 million to 4.81 million.


American streets look quite different depending on where in the country you look. In the richer coastal areas with educated professional immigrants, foreign manufacturers are far more prevalent than in red states.
 
Last edited:
China has been a source of cheap manufacturing for a while now.
Sure, aren't we all using made in China stuff...to take pictures, call people, write comments, do maths, run offices etc, etc? We don't seem to make anything worthwhile ourselves lately, don't you think so?
 
Sure, aren't we all using made in China stuff...to take pictures, call people, write comments, do maths, run offices etc, etc? We don't seem to make anything worthwhile ourselves lately, don't you think so?
No, I don't agree with that in any way. But again, I have no idea what this has to do with the rest of the conversation. It was originally about why the EU has fallen so far behind the US in tech.
 
The problem with your mindset,

Argue facts and counter opinions. Don’t create straw men about people’s “mindsets”.

Apple is right no matter what, government is over reaching no matter what.

Said NO ONE ever in this thread.

But it’s not the US, their government or their people. An opinion on how one should be governed is generally formed on how they’re actually governed.

You are lucky the US didn’t adopt your attitude in WWII. We would have had to say: “Sorry, we can’t help you with that fascism thing. We can’t insert our opinions since that’s how you are actually governed.”

Therefore, most people here are making false equivalences with every post.

I suspect you don’t know the meaning of “false equivalence”.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.