No, it’s not. You should read up on the law.In the UK it is totally banned for the driver to touch a phone for ANY reason BAR a 999 (like 911) call. And that includes when your stopped in traffic and navigation. So here it makes no difference as it should be.
Your driving a car, with a mass of say 1.3 tons at 50 to 60 mph about a couple of feet or less apart from another car doing the exact same thing coming from the opposite direction, it only takes one tiny lapse in concentration and BAM! A closing head on impact of 100mph plus.
So that brings me to my point; will this cause more accidents than a simple Touch ID lock?
So that brings me to my point; will this cause more accidents than a simple Touch ID lock? It’s just a question, I’m not over here trying to claim Touch ID is somehow safer.
No, it’s not. You should read up on the law.
For the sake of clarification:
The Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) Regulations 1986
Mobile telephones
110.
—(1) No person shall drive a motor vehicle on a road if he is using—
(a) a hand-held mobile telephone; or
(b) a hand-held device of a kind specified in paragraph (4).
(2) No person shall cause or permit any other person to drive a motor vehicle on a road
while that other person is using—
(a) a hand-held mobile telephone; or
(b) a hand-held device of a kind specified in paragraph (4).
(3) No person shall supervise a holder of a provisional licence if the person supervising
is using—
(a) a hand-held mobile telephone; or
(b) a hand-held device of a kind specified in paragraph (4),
at a time when the provisional licence holder is driving a motor vehicle on a road.
(4) A device referred to in paragraphs (1)(b), (2)(b) and (3)(b) is a device, other than a
two-way radio, which performs an interactive communication function by transmitting
and receiving data.
And in the legislation;
"a mobile telephone or other device is to be treated as hand-held if it is, or must be, held at some point during the course of making or receiving a call or performing any other interactive communication function".
If anything, maybe iPhone X users try it and realize how unsafe it is, and they’ll stop using their phones in the car like every other idiot.
What gets me are the people who don't want me to touch the phone even when I'm stopped at a red light.
I'm sorry officer that I drove over that girl and killed them... blame Apple for their stupid face ID crap...
Yeah their is s BIG REASON most countries make it illegal for you to use your phone whilst driving....
Funny that..
That’s some very wishful thinking. I’ve seen some... incredible stuff in rush our traffic lol. I’ve taien to public transit when I can, which is now almost always lol.If anything, maybe iPhone X users try it and realize how unsafe it is, and they’ll stop using their phones in the car like every other idiot.
I think you have to look st the phone to unlock it (if I’m not mistaken?), so your stuck looking st the phone for that extra second or two or three. That’s my thought.It’s not the method of unlocking that is dangerous so much as it is then giving the phone your attention after it’s unlocked.
They want control and promote it with some tenuous notion of safety. People are distracted for all sorts of reasons and some are just poor drivers. Here in Southern California about half the drivers are on some form of drugs or are so mentally unstable that they ought be precluded from operating a motor vehicle. Of course, making the acquisition of a driver's license more difficult by having more demanding examinations would never be acceptable to a lot of people because they'd claim it smacks of unfairness.
[doublepost=1506285990][/doublepost]
You think that just because various countries make something illegal that that makes it right? There are lots of distractions that occur while driving; however, the cell phone provides a convenient target for those that have a need to posit blame. Perhaps, it's not the phone, but the person using the phone that ought be blamed. Reasonable people do not need such restrictions to force them to use a cell phone safely. Come to think of it, law enforcement ought not use their communication devices while driving.
Law enforcement usually have a partner in the car to do all the screen-intensive work, too.Erm???? I think your confused, laws exist because of dumb people who use their phones, they are a distraction, and law enforcement use radios...
I don’t think you’ve thought your comment through at all because it actually reads as though you are defending the use of phones whilst driving!!
Do you moan about drink drive laws too??
This assumes people aren’t generally idiots.If anything, maybe iPhone X users try it and realize how unsafe it is, and they’ll stop using their phones in the car like every other idiot.
Don’t tell me do not disturb while driving addresses this at all.
It is yet another terrible design choice in a long list of missteps by Apple with this release. Don’t tell me do not disturb while driving addresses this at all.
Whenever I see someone texting and driving I chase after them and throw my beer bottle at them.
the user will have to look straight into the phone in order to unlock the device