I'm not sure I understand. What is your desire to move on to a PC was due to the M1's inability to drive multiple 4k monitors?
It was more about the M1 Studio and the Studio Display with stand being a terrible value proposition. Properly specced, the combo was going to cost north of $5k — and you’re still stuck with essentially a 5k iMac screen at 60hz, costing $2k for the monitor/stand alone? Hated it.
But a cheaper M2 Pro Mac Mini, with improved display i/o, along with new monitor releases, or an LG 42 OLED for ~$800, that’s a new ballgame.
I'm not trying to say the M2 is trash, but desktop computing can offer a lot more options, performance and choices that can still be significantly less expensive then a nicely equipped MBP.
Perhaps. But the new Mac mini offers good performance for a good price, and in a pleasing form factor — if you don’t need a huge GPU.
Also, part of this is coming from the realization I don’t want to play computer games anymore, and realizing I haven’t wanted to in quite some time. Boring, repetitive, waste of time, waste of life. Take away the need for 4k 144hz gaming, and you eliminate the need for most of these graphics cards. And if you’re not gaming, Apple’s ARM and GPU architecture starts to make more sense.
I may be thinking about this wrong. But you first eliminate the need to purchase an overpriced Studio Display (because of improved third-party options at reasonable prices). Then add in a competitively priced Apple desktop (Mac Mini M2 pro) that can now properly drive these third-party monitors.
I just see this changing the equation, from a horribly overpriced and limited desktop/monitor pairing (Mac Studio + 60hz IPS Apple Display), to a reasonable desktop choice (Mac Mini) with an improved ability to drive a now-wider choice of third-party monitors (e.g. LG OLEDS, Dell IPS black panels, Dell upcoming 6k 32-inch, many more in 2023 and 2024 from Philips, Lenovo, ASUS).