I'm a life long PC user, I started out using PCs in the 1980s, with the IBM PC, but I've used Macs not terribly long after that.
Yes, Apple made some decisions with macOS that altered how subpixel antialising occurs, the downside is the majority of monitors look rather poorly on a mac. I've had many a conversation in the forums here, people acknowledging it, some apple fans denying it, and some fans making excuses for apple. Finally there's some apple fans that blamed me, because I own MBP, and I cheeped out on not buying a new expensive monitor ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
For me, (and I've said this many times in the forum), I use the right tool for the job. I still own a MBP, it's a great tool. I don't generally have it hooked up to a monitor but I do use it. I have a desktop and razer laptop as well, so I have the luxury of picking the best option.
Sometimes when we use somethin for so long, things get stale. This may be one of those cases. I don't mind Window's UI, though its horribly inconsistent. I do the flexibility and options to customize the look and feel of the Windows - something that you really can't macOS. I also don't like the flat icons that is present has been present in windows.
In summary, I think you get or use the best machine that checks off the most boxes and to me the PC/Windows does that. I try not to get emotionally tied to my decisions, but in a sense we all do to some degree.