Still not interested unless you can sell it to me with no data plan. I have no reason to spend $70 a month on a phone. Hell, $40 (well 50 after taxes and txt) is almost too expensive, but what can you do.
I'll take a 32gb with a 3.2mp camera, a faster processor, more memory, and a better cell radio please!
Will you pay $400 for it even with a 2 year subscription required?
Is it time to post a big "I told you so" to all the people here who berated every body who explained that Apple would do precisely this (offer lower end hardware) to differentiate the iPhone line?
I think it would be pretty humorous to see what the self proclaimed experts who posted that "Apple only builds high end hardware, they will never sell a low end iPhone line" have to say now.
Why not? If you don't need a ton of music or take a lot of photos, what do you need lots of memory for? Not email or web surfing, and most apps don't take up huge chunks of space.
So if you could offer a 4GB for $99+contract, or even free with contract (8GB: $99; 16GB: $199; 32GB: $299) you could get lots of people into the fold. AT&T just wants the data revenue, so for them they'd love a cheapy model to "give away"
I really hope they don't go the "software differentiation" route. That seems awfully Microsoft to me, kind of like their half-baked (and thankfully repealed) notion to let Vista Starter Edition only run 3 apps at a time despite no technical reason why it couldn't run more. The reality is, if they attempt to differentiate the models by imposing artificial restrictions the hacking community will certainly find a way around it. I hope Apple is better than being reduced to this kind of move. Now, if the high-end "iPhone Pro" (that's my vote for the name!) had significantly better hardware that could certainly open up a new level of application complexity. That would be a much better way to differentiate the models!
Just my $0.02
fr0
Let me join the guessfest...
Apple keeps the existing iPhones as the new low-end models (now with OS 3 and a lower price-point though) and introduce two new iPhones as the high-end models (more RAM, video, GPS, OS 3 etc).
What about the iPod Touch? If low end iPhones arrives with cheaper price, who's gonna buy them, i'm using touch, i love it, but i prefered it because of 32 gig. What's gonna make iPod Touch special now. 64GB?
What about the iPod Touch? If low end iPhones arrives with cheaper price, who's gonna buy them, i'm using touch, i love it, but i prefered it because of 32 gig. What's gonna make iPod Touch special now. 64GB?
I would. I paid that much for my BlackBerry Bold before they added the $100 rebate at AT&T.
Apple said they simply wanted to make the best phone on the Market. They haven't said anything about making cheapo crippled versions of the best phone in the world! The one thing apple are consistent on is playing the branding game and perceived brand exclusivity. By selling an iPhone that's scaled down or differentiated in any major way other than storage capacity they dilute the perceived value of the brand... You may be right, but I really would be suprised if they did it...
4GB, WTF?![]()
Maybe that means:
4GB = 2 - 3.2 MP camera
8GB = 3.2 MP camera
16GB = 5MP camera (video recording)
32GB = 5MP camrea (video recording)
Here we go again...
Maybe that means:
4GB = 2 - 3.2 MP camera
8GB = 3.2 MP camera
16GB = 5MP camera (video recording)
32GB = 5MP camrea (video recording)
...Now, if the high-end "iPhone Pro" (that's my vote for the name!) had significantly better hardware that could certainly open up a new level of application complexity...
...because the apps in the app store are all designed for the current screensize and it would make a lot of them obsolete if a new iphone had a smaller screen size...