Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Update:

The reseller's customer service agreed to replace the scratched MBP with another new one, and I took the 1 TB/16/i5 model instead of the previous 512 to see if a different model makes a difference. I was already preparing to return it in two weeks and replace with X1 Carbon (or X1 Extreme, I would have to see how large it is in real life), but today I got a call from Apple. Their engineers will be in touch with the reseller and try to get all three of my MBPs back to try and figure out what the duck the problem is. As for the fourth one, Apple asked that I immediately get in touch if anything starts to fail, as they will want to do the same, open it and figure out what's going on. The lady who called me was rather baffled, and actually mentioned the keyboards have been re-engineered to improve their reliability...

(I was also asked if I happen to work in a dusty environment... I suppose we could dust our living room more often or get a cleaner to come twice a day and ensure my laptop's wellbeing...)

Anyway, the important bit is that I've been using the new MBP for WHOLE THREE DAYS already... okay, two and a half if you exclude reformatting to get rid of the crypto_val errors, then reinstalling everything... and all keys still work. Magic or what? It still shows me that the idea of using a MBP as my only computer is just laughable. I'm waiting for NVidia's drivers for Mojito so I have my Hackintosh running in two weeks when the keyboard fails again just in case.
 
This was my posting of August in another forum:
The membrane of 3rd generation butterfly mechanism impedes the input of dust and small dirty particles – so they do not reach quickly the sensitive zone in between the butterfly arms and bottom at the contact zone. But nevertheless dust and particles are gathered by the same membrane at the alongside edges (rim) and because you give MBP into the vertical while transport they are pushed to the corners right the place where the butterfly arms pierce through the membrane. If you replace your MBP into horizontal working position dust, particles penetrate finally the membrane through the 4 holes down driven by gravity. In the corners the membrane works as a funnel which directs the particles right in the most sensitive area, mentioned above, in which the arms have to touch completely the bottom over the whole length when you push keys to write. In the following time the dust and particles are compressed together and these small heaps are growing and growing till the butterfly arms do not reach the bottom anymore – then you realize the failure of a letter while typing. If there are hard particles between arms and bottom you will get a spontaneous failure all of a sudden.

The membrane makes a cleaning by compressed air impossible – so in doubt I would prefer 2ndbutterfly generation.

The membrane prolongates the time till failure will arise, but this isn't helpful for customers at all.

Apple must take flight into a remake of the laptop series MB, Mac Book Pro and the new predicted MB „Air“.

For users:
Take flight into the older versions of MB Pro (2015) if power is enough for your needs or wait ;)

Appendix:
Not mentioned the temperature induced problems of the membrane with hight temperatures (in the sun) and temperature change.

Then there are failures without dust and dirt – another topic :(
 
Last edited:
cleanroom-photo-new.png


These people are well prepared to operate their butterfly keyboard MacBooks.
 
I suppose we could dust our living room more often or get a cleaner to come twice a day and ensure my laptop's wellbeing

I've been using Mac laptops since 2001 and I've never had a keyboard fail from "dust". I really hope Apple finds some face-saving way to back away from this horrible mistake and put usable keyboards with decent tactility back into their machines.
 
This was my posting of August in another forum:
The membrane of 3rd generation butterfly mechanism impedes the input of dust and small dirty particles – so they do not reach quickly the sensitive zone in between the butterfly arms and bottom at the contact zone. But nevertheless dust and particles are gathered by the same membrane at the alongside edges (rim) and because you give MBP into the vertical while transport they are pushed to the corners right the place where the butterfly arms pierce through the membrane. If you replace your MBP into horizontal working position dust, particles penetrate finally the membrane through the 4 holes down driven by gravity. In the corners the membrane works as a funnel which directs the particles right in the most sensitive area, mentioned above, in which the arms have to touch completely the bottom over the whole length when you push keys to write. in the following time the dust and particles are compressed together and these small heaps are growing and growing till the butterfly arms do not reach the bottom anymore – then you realize the failure of a letter while typing. If there are hard particles between arms and bottom you will get a spontaneous failure all of a sudden.

The membrane makes a cleaning by compressed air impossible – so in doubt I would prefer 2ndbutterfly generation.

The membrane prolongates the time till failure will arise, but this isn't helpful for customers at all.

Apple must take flight into a remake of the laptop series MB, Mac Book Pro and the new predicted MB „Air“.

Take flight into the older versions of MB Pro (2015) if power is enough for you or wait ;)

Quite the most technical and well-explained explanation I've read so far in any forum. Well said sir.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ignatius345
I bought a 13" 2018 MacBook Pro with Touch Bar around a week ago. I've used it only in my apartment, at my desk and in bed.

This is my first MacBook since I first bought an MBA in 2012 or 2013, and it's a pretty big letdown. The keyboard is not particularly pleasant to use for writing for any length of time, but I could live with that. The problem is that my 'r' key is already affected by the sticky key issue. Key presses in the bottom left corner of the key are not registering. Of course the keyboard is still usable if I take care to press the centre of the key, but this is not what I expect from a $2000+ laptop after a week of light use.

So much for the fabled apple build quality... I have an appointment at the Genius Bar on Tuesday, where I expect I'll be told there's nothing they can do.

mindfulmac -- I'm an Australian lawyer and you can be sure I don't intend to go quietly if Apple isn't willing to assist...

Told you so! Well, not you specifically, but any reputable forum, that these things were badly designed, and no amount of market driven claims will fix a fundamental engineering flaw. Then again, Insider had leaks that the Macbook Division had been gutted by 2016 by very high double figure percentiles, in money and personnel. My 2015 Pro still runs flawlessly with 15 hrs playback time on flights. As much as I cannot believe it, the Huawei is the best Mac right now!
[doublepost=1539969237][/doublepost]The r
Just to nitpick, they have a repair programme.. a recall would be asking everyone to return their laptops for a new keyboard. ( Not that I don't think that should be what they do.. but as they're not replacing it with a different design.. )

The reason they cannot do a recall, as I argued many months ago, is MONEE. Having sold tens of millions of these butter-jam garbage, with a projected repair cost of let's say 500$ per keyboard, ok 300? IF they sold 50 million units it is 15 Billion$ recall. So cheaper to have ongoing 4 year warranty, even if owners will get no use out of defective machines worth 2,400-6,500$... unless some class action addresses it once and for all. Shocking to say, as aMac fan, but the best Macbook right now is Huawei's Matebook Pro! That chiclet design has decades worth of development and billions of typed on keys... Someone invented Butterjam to save Apple IP costs, and VOILA it is your problem now, or the consumer's..
[doublepost=1539969482][/doublepost]How abo
Quite the most technical and well-explained explanation I've read so far in any forum. Well said sir.

A simpler explanation: chiclet was a time proven design with billions of presses and decades worth of development. Someone at Apple decided to save IP costs by inventing their own butter-jam garbage, and the Matebook Pro by Huawei is the best Mac right now!! remove ports etc, and 2,400-6,000 butter-jam not working brick Macbook is the best con job in history. We can also get into materiel science and plastic polycarbonate types, softening point at 40C (which weakens a butter-fly type mechanism with cycles of cold-warm-cold-warm) but that gets too technical.
[doublepost=1539969914][/doublepost]I'd love them saving face bu
I've been using Mac laptops since 2001 and I've never had a keyboard fail from "dust". I really hope Apple finds some face-saving way to back away from this horrible mistake and put usable keyboards with decent tactility back into their machines.
I'd like them to save face, but it will cost them. Lets say their KB replacement cost is 300, not 700, then 50 million units is 15 BILLION USD to slap the shareholders with... That Huawei Matebook Pro looks more and more like the Macbook that never was! From a consumer standpoint, I remember the 2016 announcement as soon as I heard the butter-jam description, instinct told me "GONNA FAIL." How could it best decades worth of chiclet IP and billions of success key types? People said "It's Apple, they got engineers" Insider kept saying "Engineers told us the Mac Division was completely gutted before the 2016 redesign". Reality is slapping all the fanbase in the face. Every Apple store I walked in saw demos with not functioning keyboards. NEVER a chiclet one. 2015 Pro still runs flawlessly, still in warranty until 2019, and 15 hours airtime movie playback... Yes, slower than the new processors, but works across 24 time zones. Butter Jam? Try repairing it in Tanzania!
[doublepost=1539970761][/doublepost]
Can you list your build?

I've been going back and forth between the 2.2 and 2.6, as well as 555x and 560x. I wouldn't mind spending a bit extra to get better performance, but am more worried about how these laptops will hold up over time due to the increased heat from the CPU and GPU upgrades. In my past two 15" MacBook Pros, I've run into GPU issues (Nvidia) over time. I'm a bit wary.

There is an entire material science that tells different types of plastics and softening point. If you wish to know what is the key temperature, it 33-49C for HDPE and LDPE plastics. No matter the type of plastic, thickness affects everything. Since Chiclet/membrane does not have uber tiny butterfly mechanism, it can survive 90Celsius Hp laptops. But Apple's Butterjam, uber thin, combination of heat cycles AND, possibly, dust- as I refuse to believe it is all caused by dust- this has not been demonstrated empirically, dooms these things. The fragility, plus temperature and finger pressure is more likely to mess them up than dust, but dust appears to do it as well in some cases. Not all. Keys that stop responding and are not dust related, as youtubers demonstrated, are related to how the butterjam signal cease transfering the signal. A youtuber opens a key and adds tape, thus fixing the typing issue. That says, beyond a doubt, that dust was not it, but the butter-jam's compression ratio had changed, needing the tape. What the membrane does, glancing at it, acted a bit as a shock absorber, silencer and pressure distribution (so distributing forces and changing the compression), even if that may not have been its intended design (perhaps a measure of silence was it). Underneath the membrane, the butter jam mechanics was as fragile as originally intended, and will be so unless replaced completely.
 
Last edited:
The thing I can’t understand is why Apple significantly compromised the single most important interface on a laptop...the keyboard......just to save a marginal amount thickness. It’s like, the MBA wasn’t thin enough with a traditional keyboard mechanism? I don’t get it! Once you get to a certain point, marginal reductions in thickness just don’t mean much to the user experience. I can see how footprint might make a difference, so reducing the bezels is worthwhile. From a design perspective, I just don’t see what Apple is getting for all of these headaches.
 
The thing I can’t understand is why Apple significantly compromised the single most important interface on a laptop...the keyboard......just to save a marginal amount thickness. It’s like, the MBA wasn’t thin enough with a traditional keyboard mechanism? I don’t get it! Once you get to a certain point, marginal reductions in thickness just don’t mean much to the user experience. I can see how footprint might make a difference, so reducing the bezels is worthwhile. From a design perspective, I just don’t see what Apple is getting for all of these headaches.

It is called cognitive dissonance with groupthink. A cafe latte at their former HQ R&D center thinking they cannot invent anything bad. And since they gutted all the Mac division, it probably was a team of 3-5 engineers and technicians that designed this digitally, simulated it via engineering software, and, lastly, they built it. Of course they never really tried it other than a few days here or there, perhaps they were paranoid about leaks. Cannot imagine them trying it, as I estimate a 30-60% failure rate in 6 months so if they had just 3 prototypes they should have had one fail. Remember, the teams that actually build prototypes are very very very small and secretive. My guess is one engineer with a software thinking he's created a thinner better mechanism, tested it digitally then they moved to make 1-2 units. Proposed it to the head of designs, I think Johnny Ive, then it went up the approval chain without further testing, and then production.

Now this is interesting, unlike other technical flops that forced suppliers to pay Apple hundreds of millions, or more (e.g. Nvidia), this one is purely Apple Self Inflicted. They cannot force some PRC factory to chuck up money for this, it is not their fault.
 
Last edited:

Of course not. The design was unfixable, I was certain of that the moment butterjam was announced in 2016, Keynote speech.. What a shameful disaster. Ironically, have never known a SINGLE butterfly mechanism to work reliably. Membrane or mechanical are multi billion stroke proven workhorses..

Anyway I feel for all those whome bought these bricks... As a tech advisors helping people get a good laptop, all I can do now is recommend the Huawei Matebook Pro!
 
My MBA has been the best computer I ever owned. It is wonderfully reliable, portable, and energy efficient (battery life is amazing). But, its days are numbered, and Apple is wed to their butterfly mechanism, so I am considering alternatives. I want to stay with the Apple ecosystem, so I will probably have to go with a Mac desktop (hopefully Mac Mini refresh) plus an iPad. For the last year, I have been experimenting by using my MBA in clamshell mode only as a desktop and using an iPad as my primary portable device. Frankly, this works fine for me. So, unless a rabbit gets pulled out of a hat at the October 30 event, I am pretty much done with Apple laptops.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Ulenspiegel
I wish I could Hackintosh Matebook X Pro, it's GORGEOUS, that thing. Although of course it lacks a Touch Bar... ;)
[doublepost=1540017399][/doublepost]Ooh, I'm famous now ;) Call me One Poster from now on!

It is true that when I spoke to Apple ER she said the engineers were baffled "because those keyboards were improved". The official line might be "quieter" but that's not what Dilbert the engineering team actually tried to do.
 
As much as I respect Casey. This post heavily relies on this particular thread than other sources.

Anything to beat the drum of the death to the butterfly keyboard is welcome, though.

Very true, but the fact that it relies so heavily on this thread is primarily why I posted it to this thread. It condenses page upon page of posts into a TL:DR version, while also adding some of his own personal experience.

Natasha’s article about the keyboards is also on point and doesn’t rely on posts in this thread or forum...


An ode to Apple’s awful MacBook keyboard

https://techcrunch.com/2018/09/01/an-ode-to-apples-awful-mac-keyboard/

Also Casey Johnson’s piece about the keyboards...

https://theoutline.com/post/2402/the-new-macbook-keyboard-is-ruining-my-life
 
Last edited:
Of course not. The design was unfixable, I was certain of that the moment butterjam was announced in 2016, Keynote speech.. What a shameful disaster. Ironically, have never known a SINGLE butterfly mechanism to work reliably. Membrane or mechanical are multi billion stroke proven workhorses..

Thats all well and good, and the reliability problems with the butterfly keyboard are well documented on here. But what alternative is there? If only there was another machine that was better than the MBP, that could be used in its place and without the unreliable keyboard...but me, I just cant see what that machine would be...anyone have any ideas??






;)
 
I've been using Mac laptops since 2001 and I've never had a keyboard fail from "dust". I really hope Apple finds some face-saving way to back away from this horrible mistake and put usable keyboards with decent tactility back into their machines.

Maybe Macrumors should change the Buyers guide so it would reflect this issues.

Macbook Pro
Macbook

DO NOT BUY - until keyboard issues are resolved.


My MBA has been the best computer I ever owned. It is wonderfully reliable, portable, and energy efficient (battery life is amazing). But, its days are numbered, and Apple is wed to their butterfly mechanism, so I am considering alternatives. I want to stay with the Apple ecosystem, so I will probably have to go with a Mac desktop (hopefully Mac Mini refresh) plus an iPad. For the last year, I have been experimenting by using my MBA in clamshell mode only as a desktop and using an iPad as my primary portable device. Frankly, this works fine for me. So, unless a rabbit gets pulled out of a hat at the October 30 event, I am pretty much done with Apple laptops.

As much as I respect Casey. This post heavily relies on this particular thread than other sources.

Anything to beat the drum of the death to the butterfly keyboard is welcome, though.

Thats all well and good, and the reliability problems with the butterfly keyboard are well documented on here. But what alternative is there? If only there was another machine that was better than the MBP, that could be used in its place and without the unreliable keyboard...but me, I just cant see what that machine would be...anyone have any ideas??






;)

We need a campaign to bring awareness of this issue to the public at large and to boycott all Apple laptops until they include a different and reliable keyboard, whether it be a chiclet keyboard or whether Apple pays another company to use its IP (Lenovo please). Awareness needs to spread beyond tech specific forums.

So how do we do this?

PS--I too am using a MBA but I will need a new laptop soon and I will not buy anything with Apple's scissor keys in it.
 
As much as I respect Casey. This post heavily relies on this particular thread than other sources.

What other sources are there? Apple won't disclose information about percentage of failed keyboards, so these forums are actually not that bad, if account for the fact, that people tend to exaggerate when it comes to negativity.

With that said, I know about 8 people who own buttershit Macbooks and Macbook Pros. One claims he doesn't have any problems. Everybody else has had theirs in service at least once. And with me being on my 4th keyboard and 2nd Macbook Pro 15'' I cannot but feel Apple really dropped the ball here big time.

Most probably they will just stop using physical keyboards altogether. If they revert back to previous design it will look too bad.
 
Thats all well and good, and the reliability problems with the butterfly keyboard are well documented on here. But what alternative is there? If only there was another machine that was better than the MBP, that could be used in its place and without the unreliable keyboard...but me, I just cant see what that machine would be...anyone have any ideas??
;)

Huawei Matebook Pro is a Mac copy with substantial improvements, including screen (esp a Web and Productivity friendly aspect ratio) , processor, speakers,and CHICLET, yet good old keyboard. Following feedback, Huawei immediately modified its units to include more ports. What does this say? Remember when PC users such as me converted to Macs because Apple offered us what we needed and wanted? At the moment, that is Huawei. I dislike the company's predatory practices (some accuse Apple of the same thing), but all reviewers praise the machines. They trash Dell Hp it is not even funny.
[doublepost=1540045739][/doublepost]
My MBA has been the best computer I ever owned. It is wonderfully reliable, portable, and energy efficient (battery life is amazing). But, its days are numbered, and Apple is wed to their butterfly mechanism, so I am considering alternatives. I want to stay with the Apple ecosystem, so I will probably have to go with a Mac desktop (hopefully Mac Mini refresh) plus an iPad. For the last year, I have been experimenting by using my MBA in clamshell mode only as a desktop and using an iPad as my primary portable device. Frankly, this works fine for me. So, unless a rabbit gets pulled out of a hat at the October 30 event, I am pretty much done with Apple laptops.

Would not use the MBA as a desktop unit. each time I did it it fried the GPU, three replacements. The MBP has the better graphics. That aside, the GFs 2011 MBA rune perfectly, post 2013 they started having shady builds, some arriving DOA from the factory. To put things in perspective, my 2008 MBP had the Nvidia fail, so mobo replaced in 2012 (still runs with an SSD); my MBA had three replacements due to factory issue- screen swollen battery etc as I ordered the higher Gb one. The 2015 MBP was an Apple care gift for the troubles. First two were defective, non stop crashing and blue roundel. The third one was the charm, 500 cycles, months of foreign travel in crappy countries, 15 hrs playback on battery, rock solid etc. But to get to that rock solid 2015 unit, Apple went through 12,000$ worth of defective laptops. Been trying to kill my 2014 blazing Dell Alienware, its redundant circuits make it impossible. In perspective, Macs have been an atrocious experience QC wise; seems that the older, much older, the Steve Jobs era ones were great quality.
[doublepost=1540046204][/doublepost]
What other sources are there? Apple won't disclose information about percentage of failed keyboards, so these forums are actually not that bad, if account for the fact, that people tend to exaggerate when it comes to negativity.

With that said, I know about 8 people who own buttershit Macbooks and Macbook Pros. One claims he doesn't have any problems. Everybody else has had theirs in service at least once. And with me being on my 4th keyboard and 2nd Macbook Pro 15'' I cannot but feel Apple really dropped the ball here big time.

Most probably they will just stop using physical keyboards altogether. If they revert back to previous design it will look too bad.

The numbers are probably higher than 30%, perhaps much higher. An ArsTechnica New York investigation revealed year one an easy 10%. However, most year one people reported on forums waiting it out OR using a separate keyboard anyway (!). Casey Johnson had three failures. No need to do math. But when OverClock Computers sells SSD upgrades and they fail in weeks, months, as do their replacement, their industrial failure rate MUST be over 30%, and probably 50% by year 1-2, 50-80% year 3. Our MBPs Surface and high grade laptops use high reliability industrial grade SSDs with projected failures of 1/10,000 first year. A big improvement over the 10-15% HDD failure rate. Anyone getting a KB replaced and using it correctly, including CPU demanding task that warm up the laptop and soften the butterjam plastics at 39C, and it fails AGAIN, we are dealing with over 50% failure rates. Catastrophic numbers basically. Walking into an Apple Store, tried three macbooks and all had some unresponsive key, the worse one, 5 keys. Unfortunately, many peopel do use these as desktop units, thus eschewing actual reporting, and many more reported having issues but not bothering taking it in PRIOR to a clear solution being offered, which is not the case. Many people bought them with Apple care, with 2017 units being the most appleCared MBPs. That means there should be a surge in claims 2019-2020.

Anyway we size it, a recall would cost Apple some 10+ billion$, at a low cost replacement figure of 300$ vs the 700 they charge..
[doublepost=1540046273][/doublepost]
Huawei Matebook Pro is a Mac copy with substantial improvements, including screen (esp a Web and Productivity friendly aspect ratio) , processor, speakers,and CHICLET, yet good old keyboard. Following feedback, Huawei immediately modified its units to include more ports. What does this say? Remember when PC users such as me converted to Macs because Apple offered us what we needed and wanted? At the moment, that is Huawei. I dislike the company's predatory practices (some accuse Apple of the same thing), but all reviewers praise the machines. They trash Dell Hp it is not even funny.
[doublepost=1540045739][/doublepost]

Would not use the MBA as a desktop unit. each time I did it it fried the GPU, three replacements. The MBP has the better graphics. That aside, the GFs 2011 MBA rune perfectly, post 2013 they started having shady builds, some arriving DOA from the factory. To put things in perspective, my 2008 MBP had the Nvidia fail, so mobo replaced in 2012 (still runs with an SSD); my MBA had three replacements due to factory issue- screen swollen battery etc as I ordered the higher Gb one. The 2015 MBP was an Apple care gift for the troubles. First two were defective, non stop crashing and blue roundel. The third one was the charm, 500 cycles, months of foreign travel in crappy countries, 15 hrs playback on battery, rock solid etc. But to get to that rock solid 2015 unit, Apple went through 12,000$ worth of defective laptops. Been trying to kill my 2014 blazing Dell Alienware, its redundant circuits make it impossible. In perspective, Macs have been an atrocious experience QC wise; seems that the older, much older, the Steve Jobs era ones were great quality.
[doublepost=1540046204][/doublepost]

The numbers are probably higher than 30%, perhaps much higher. An ArsTechnica New York investigation revealed year one an easy 10%. However, most year one people reported on forums waiting it out OR using a separate keyboard anyway (!). Casey Johnson had three failures. No need to do math. But when OverClock Computers sells SSD upgrades and they fail in weeks, months, as do their replacement, their industrial failure rate MUST be over 30%, and probably 50% by year 1-2, 50-80% year 3. Our MBPs Surface and high grade laptops use high reliability industrial grade SSDs with projected failures of 1/10,000 first year. A big improvement over the 10-15% HDD failure rate and why we never hear of toshiba or Samsung SSDs fail. BUT, anyone getting a KB replaced and using it correctly, including CPU demanding task that warm up the laptop and soften the butterjam plastics at 39C, and it fails AGAIN, we are dealing with over 50% failure rates. Catastrophic numbers basically. Walking into an Apple Store, tried three macbooks and all had some unresponsive key, the worse one, 5 keys. Unfortunately, many people do use these as desktop units, thus eschewing actual reporting, and many more reported having issues but not bothering taking it in PRIOR to a clear solution being offered, which is not the case. Many people bought them with Apple care, with 2017 units being the most appleCared MBPs. That means there should be a surge in claims 2019-2020.

Anyway we size it, a recall would cost Apple some 10+ billion$, at a low cost replacement figure of 300$ vs the 700 they charge..
 
I too am using a MBA but I will need a new laptop soon and I will not buy anything with Apple's scissor keys in it.

Yeah, if I upgrade at all anytime soon, I'll get my hands on one of the 2015 MBPs with the normal keyboard, used, refurbished, whatever. It's not just the reliability, I find typing on the butterfly keyboard quite unpleasant, even after trying to get used to it for a full month. And if any of this crap about "virtual keyboards" comes true, I'm probably off Mac laptops forever. It would be sad, but I think I could make a Windows laptop of some kind suit my needs if I had to.

I have a 2012 MPB that was just barely eligible for Mojave and is generally running nicely. I could probably limp it along for a while, as it's really just for writing and web/email/general stuff.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.