I just hoped the wired earpods will continue to be around to replace mine when i will eventually lose them.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Gene Munster Predicts Apple Will Eventually Earn More From AirPods Than Apple Watch
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
They need active noise canceling - as they are now they don't fit snug enough for me to be able to use them on a plane - too much ambient sound leaks through and I have to crank the volume to hear music which I know is not good for my ears - so I wear other buds when traveling.
Right, these make you look like a "t**t".
How are people so turned off by something that is the exact same look, minus the wire?
How are people so turned off by something that is the exact same look, minus the wire?
Hm, this is what I wanted to ask. Do EarPods and AirpPods have the same size and shape? In the photos they look the same, more or less. From what you say they are not. So, which is it?
Any other reports from users having both EarPods and AirpPods? I have the wired EarPods, which fit me very well, and I would like to buy the AirPods but because of the negative reports I am hesitating, considering their high price.
They are not the exact same shape. On top of being very lightweight (the lack of wire makes them less likely to get weighed down and fall out), they are just slightly different in shape - but enough that I wouldn't "trust" prior experience with EarPods. They are also louder with a better range of highs and lows than EarPods.
(ETA: Qualifier - I've had my AirPods for about 36 hours. I also have a pair of EarPods and In-Ear headphones from Apple with me. AirPods are the most comfortable and better sounding)
Claiming that Apple will change the appearance of something just "to tell newer model from old" is a favorite tactic of the crowd who don't understand Apple and insist that it "sells only based on fashion" --- even though common sense makes it clear how idiotic the claim is. Apple's biggest money-maker by far is the iPhone, and yet Apple transitioned from keeping the iPhone body the same across two years (iphone 4/4S, then 5/5D) to three years (7 looks like 6, likely 7S will look like 7 meaning 4 years for the bulk model, ignoring iPhone 8 specialty model rumors).
And those 4 to 5 to 6 visual changes were all driven by a real change in the screen, not just "to look different".
More realistic advances will be, IMHO, yes the OTHER examples you give --- color, battery, new BT. But also I could see
- addition of an LED. This among other things, makes it easier to find them. And it's the sort of functionality that could be useful in other ways, just like no-one predicted that having an LED flash on your phone was actually constantly useful as a portable flashlight.
- store audio on the device. Not only does this extend battery life, but it means the audio keeps playing even if you walk away from your phone (or whatever)
- more digital processing within the device. eg Some attempt at noise cancellation, some attempt at companding.
- live audio translation (babelfish...)
- more health metrics (eg UV sensors to track sun exposure. Can augment sensors present in the watch. eg watch UV sensor can get covered by shirt cuff. Maybe thermometer for ongoing tracking of body temperature and early detection of fever? Maybe [I don't know] tracking blood flow in that area can give early warnings of migraines and detect patterns in when they arise?)
I believe this to be true and have recommended AirPods to a number of friends who have been on the fence.
Give them a try and you might just have the last laugh. The sound is awesome and as a person who exercises everyday, it's nice not to be tangled in a cord every few minutes. People laugh at me all the time because they are amusing to look at - but having them in both ears seem strange to you, only one is needed to be used at a time.
Cheers!
Give them a try and you might just have the last laugh. The sound is awesome and as a person who exercises everyday, it's nice not to be tangled in a cord every few minutes. People laugh at me all the time because they are amusing to look at - but having them in both ears seem strange to you, only one is needed to be used at a time.
Cheers!
It's perception. The wires are normal and people have seen them for decades. The wireless ones, IMO, absolutely look ridiculous to me. COMPLETELY RIDICULOUS. Maybe not ****ty but ughhh. Honestly, I think it may mostly have to do with coloring.
I have yet to find a more comfortable pair of headphones than EarPods. At this point I'm convinced that my ears are somehow weird, but I really don't give a hoot. I have them on, depending on the day, hours at a time, and not once have they hurt my ears or fallen out. I probably won't, however, buy the AirPods, because I'm a dinosaur who still likes to listen to music with my iPod Classic.
If I, however, at some point have a midlife crisis or something similar, I probably will switch to the wireless version.
Sure, in terms of HIFI the EarPods are probably not top of the class (or, depending on who you ask attending the class at all), but I've grown accustomed to, and quite fond of the sound myself. I mostly listen to them when I'm out and about, and for that use case I haven't found better ones, that suite me, yet.
If I, however, at some point have a midlife crisis or something similar, I probably will switch to the wireless version.
Sure, in terms of HIFI the EarPods are probably not top of the class (or, depending on who you ask attending the class at all), but I've grown accustomed to, and quite fond of the sound myself. I mostly listen to them when I'm out and about, and for that use case I haven't found better ones, that suite me, yet.
There are plenty of third party straps available (look on Amazon).
Right now these are all of the flexible variety (some silicone, some stainless steel); but if there is a demand for the rigid variety I'm sure they will ship in time.
Wireless headphones are more and more common sight when I use the subway. Maybe 1 out of 30 headphones is wireless.
I agree. I should have said Apple wireless headphones. I see all sorts of others and they look normal to me. For some reason though airpods look ridiculous to me.
The next generation MacBook Pro will ship without speakers, because "speakers have always been troublesome and prone to personal choice". Instead you will be recommended to buy a pair of Airpods or the Homepod for Audio.
Apple analyst Neil Cybart recently said Apple is "underpricing" the Apple Watch and AirPods in an effort to bring new users into its ecosystem. He said this pricing strategy was "unimaginable" ten years ago, when Apple was often accused of pricing products artificially high--aka the so-called "Apple Tax."
Underpricing? I don't know where these people live, but it seems to me Apple is definitely still over-pricing everything from watch bands to a charger cable. They are a "premium" luxury brand, Neil.
"Oh, you want an adapter for that phone that doesn't have a headphone jack so you can charge your phone and listen to something too? Well, you have to spend $40 Unless you spend $150 on different headphones, then you don't have to worry about that issue. and oh yeah, we'll make the phone more expensive too when you buy it next year so even though we just keep taking things out you'll still pay more.
Listen, an IPOD shuffle is $50. Once you add a touchscreen, antenna, and a wristband it becomes $380? Please....
While I get the appeal of an AW, to me, the real world value doesn't equal the price tag, which is why i still haven't bought one.
/Rant.
Off topic, but does it seem strange to anyone that the 7-plus 256 gb iphone is $100 more than the 256 Ipad pro with cellular? seems it should be the other way around.
Underpricing? I don't know where these people live, but it seems to me Apple is definitely still over-pricing everything from watch bands to a charger cable. They are a "premium" luxury brand, Neil.
"Oh, you want an adapter for that phone that doesn't have a headphone jack so you can charge your phone and listen to something too? Well, you have to spend $40 Unless you spend $150 on different headphones, then you don't have to worry about that issue. and oh yeah, we'll make the phone more expensive too when you buy it next year so even though we just keep taking things out you'll still pay more.
Listen, an IPOD shuffle is $50. Once you add a touchscreen, antenna, and a wristband it becomes $380? Please....
While I get the appeal of an AW, to me, the real world value doesn't equal the price tag, which is why i still haven't bought one.
/Rant.
Off topic, but does it seem strange to anyone that the 7-plus 256 gb iphone is $100 more than the 256 Ipad pro with cellular? seems it should be the other way around.
Indeed, stock is an issue, and one that was seemingly preventing me from ever buying some, but I personally eventually decided that I'd waited the six weeks delivery time several times over, so I just ordered some and figured I'd wait without constantly checking stock.
In a couple of weeks I hope I'll be happy
It's a niche product, because they are accessories to the iPhone and they are not stand alone products like the iPhone and iPad. However, if the Apple Watch continues to advance with health related features, it will outgrow the "Niche" category rather quickly, as glucose or blood pressure will benefit many.
Last edited:
You're right - the wired EarPods never worked for me; the wires pulled 'em out. The AirPods work great and never fall out.
Intersting mental exercise but rather pointless. Besides, Watch is a platform and AirPods are an accessory. AirPods sales will continue to grow but so will Watch sales.
Despite selling for $159, considerably less than the Apple Watch at between $269 and $1,499, longtime Apple analyst turned venture capitalist Gene Munster believes AirPods will be "bigger than the Apple Watch" over the next decade.
Munster predicts that AirPods will contribute "about the same amount of revenue" to Apple's pocket as the Apple Watch by the company's 2022 fiscal year. He also predicts that AirPods will have an average price of $200 by then, as the product shifts towards what he calls "augmented audio."Apple doesn't disclose AirPods or Apple Watch sales in its quarterly earnings results. Both products are instead grouped into its "Other Products" category, alongside sales of iPods, Apple TVs, Beats products, and accessories. Any revenue or sales numbers that circulate around are purely estimates.
Apple reported $2.87 billion revenue from "Other Products" last quarter, a 31 percent increase from $2.18 billion in the year-ago quarter.
Early last month, Apple CEO Tim Cook said the response to AirPods has been "great," with the wireless earphones remaining hard to come by.
"Demand for AirPods significantly exceeds supply, and growth in Beats products has also been very strong," said Cook. "In fact, when we combine Apple Watch, AirPods, and Beats headphones, our revenues from wearable products in the last four quarters was the size of a Fortune 500 company."
Despite launching over six months ago, AirPods continue to have a 6-week shipping estimate for orders placed on Apple's website. Some third-party resellers have occasionally had them in stock with earlier delivery.
Apple analyst Neil Cybart recently said Apple is "underpricing" the Apple Watch and AirPods in an effort to bring new users into its ecosystem. He said this pricing strategy was "unimaginable" ten years ago, when Apple was often accused of pricing products artificially high--aka the so-called "Apple Tax."
Cybart said a strong case could have been made for Apple to price AirPods at $249, or even $299. By selling them for $159, he thinks Apple has "removed all available oxygen from the wireless headphone space," and forced other wireless headphone makers to cut their own prices in order to remain competitive.
AirPods have been well received by early adopters, achieving a 98 percent customer satisfaction rate in a recent survey conducted by Experian and market research firm Creative Strategies.
Article Link: Gene Munster Predicts Apple Will Eventually Earn More From AirPods Than Apple Watch
.
I'm sure they will as soon as they can catch up with all the people who are already buying them as fast as they can make them
[doublepost=1498590783][/doublepost]
Come to NYC, I see a pair every 5 minutes walking down the street.
Come to NYC, I see a pair every 5 minutes walking down the street.