I'm thrilled about the glass back. I've yet to find a phone I like the feel of as much as my iPhone 4. I've never broken a phone, so stuff like this doesn't freak me out much. I spent a lot more on my car, and it doesn't drop well either, but I don't put a case on it.
That said, I am a big believer in bicycle helmets. No glass in your noggin, but treat it with respect.
Not saying the glass isn't more delicate than the aluminium, but there is an incentive here to be a bit one sided. A 6' drop test, for example, is biased toward a result.
That said, I am a big believer in bicycle helmets. No glass in your noggin, but treat it with respect.
...but let's talk about these YouTube videos like they mean something anyway...Drop tests are never scientific and are not a reliable measure of durability because of the many variables involved when a device is dropped
Apple needs to update their policy here. No reason I can think of that the back glass should cost more than a display. "Other damage" is a catch all-- it probably shouldn't apply to the obvious points of failure.With AppleCare+, Apple charges $29 for replacement for a broken display, but a broken glass body is subject to the $99 "other damage" repair fee rather than the screen replacement fee.
I've never broken a phone. I'm trying to figure out if that makes me above or below average...Yeah, carrying the phone "naked" may look and feel nice but the average person WILL break it at some point. It's inevitable.
They also sell more insurance to people more worried about breakage. Just like Anker sells more cases.Square trade is a warranty/insurance company. They have to do these tests to know what to charge to cover these devices. They aren’t mindlessly destroying.
Not saying the glass isn't more delicate than the aluminium, but there is an incentive here to be a bit one sided. A 6' drop test, for example, is biased toward a result.