Inevitible RIAA lawsuit? Check.
"MY" and "OWN" are 2 keywords there...
Inevitible RIAA lawsuit? Check.
"MY" and "OWN" are 2 keywords there...
iAds, case closed.
The pot calling the kettle black. Apple has something called iAds![]()
You have only a license. And your license does not include making a copy over a network.
In Q1, more Android phones were sold than iPhones.
Based on a single survey, which naturally Apple-haters like you wet yourselves over, and couldn't wait to use in MacRumors Forums as troll bait. Strange that no one who makes Android-based phones (or Google themselves) is releasing hard sales figures...![]()
Sorry but Simplify Media was a great idea with spotty implementation. Try streaming from a library with over 8000 tracks and see how it takes over an hour to update the library data before you can play a track. I stopped using it a while ago. Honestly, sync and change and get more capacity each revision, but OTA streaming of music catalogs is unnecessary, network dependent and straining, relies too much on having a consistent signal which isn't easy while driving. Not to mention the battery drain of streaming.
Based on a single survey, which naturally Apple-haters like you wet yourselves over, and couldn't wait to use in MacRumors Forums as troll bait. Strange that no one who makes Android-based phones (or Google themselves) is releasing hard sales figures...![]()
Sorry but Simplify Media was a great idea with spotty implementation. Try streaming from a library with over 8000 tracks and see how it takes over an hour to update the library data before you can play a track. I stopped using it a while ago. Honestly, sync and change and get more capacity each revision, but OTA streaming of music catalogs is unnecessary, network dependent and straining, relies too much on having a consistent signal which isn't easy while driving.
Peace said:Based on a single survey, which naturally Apple-haters like you wet yourselves over, and couldn't wait to use in MacRumors Forums as troll bait. Strange that no one who makes Android-based phones (or Google themselves) is releasing hard sales figures...![]()
The term "sold" is questionable. Verizon has a buy one get one free promo.
Honestly
Google is just pissing me off
Like what most said, this is NOT innovating.... this is just copying what Apple is doing....
Google isn't innovating. They are simply buying companies and copying Apple ideas.
The term "sold" is questionable. Verizon has a buy one get one free promo.
You have only a license. And your license does not include making a copy over a network.
Google isn't innovating. They are simply buying companies and copying Apple ideas.
There is nothing questionable here. You get the phone for free but you pay for the contract. It's just how the providers subsidize/structure money flows. The phone does not come for free by any means.
Google says they are activating approx. 100K phones a day.
At least Apple's "half-assed" multitasking won't be a battery killer.
[Google: "If You Are Not Getting A Day [of Android Battery], There Is Something Wrong"]
Pretty much DEAD ON!
I like Google less and less every day and have been for quite some time. They are the new Micro$oft!![]()
GamecockMac said:Google says they are activating approx. 100K phones a day.
Sure they are.![]()
Pretty much DEAD ON!
I like Google less and less every day and have been for quite some time. They are the new Micro$oft!![]()
What would happen if the CONSUMER had to pay the same price for the second phone as they did for the first phone ?
Sales of the PHONE itself would NOT be what they are shown to be. Contracts aside you still have to BUY the phone.