What really bugs me is when I m using my mac why cant I use homekit to control lights or heating?
No I have to find my phone or watch , or turn on apple tv.
It should work across all apple devices.
It’s coming
What really bugs me is when I m using my mac why cant I use homekit to control lights or heating?
No I have to find my phone or watch , or turn on apple tv.
It should work across all apple devices.
What a snobby thing to say. There are some excellent products out there that aren't compatible with HomeKit. Nest products are at the top of my list.
Some (perhaps many on this forum) hate Nest products solely because they're owned by Google. If they'd bother to look past that hate and at the actual products, they'd quickly realize that Tony Fadell (the 'father' of the iPod) and his team created some pretty amazing products with the Nest line. If Apple had bought Nest, many of the Nest haters out there would likely think they're one of the best products Apple had in its lineup.
Anecdotally, most of the people I know who interact with devices in their home via HomeKit/Siri aren't very satisfied with the experience. Siri is the primary reason for their dissatisfaction. Siri is the only voice control option if you're going all-in on HomeKit; and Siri is, in my estimation, the weakest link in the chain by far.
The fallacy of course is this; are you so arrogant that you believe people want to do this to you:Hilariously ignorant statement and makes it painfully obvious you know nothing about network security.
All you need is one vulnerable device on your network to make your day hell. Once a hacker is inside your network through a vulnerable device, they have intercept print jobs, file transfers, files in your unsecured shared folders, file backup systems, whatever you got, it's available.
The mission is to keep people out. And not just on the outside of your door.
Siri works I have google and it just doesn’t work the same, lag or not working at all . Google does work for a lot of things but if you want your stuff to just work Siri and apple home works 100 percent and is very Secure
I owned a Nest initially and switched to Ecobee to have much greater flexibility in programming and it has had external temp sensors for years. Plus it has greater security and doesn’t have Google using it as another “data collector” on you.Most of the negativity is due to the relatively small amount of devices that it supports. HomeKit is IMO the cleanest and best platform to use, you just need to make sure the products you purchase support it.
Have you ever used HomeKit? I have the same experiences as the person you quoted. HomeKit is more reliable and faster to respond.HAHAHAHAHA!!!! Hello Tim.
Rather have 200 that won't be spying on me than 5.000 anytime.
You are likely right. 99.999% of people will never need to worry about the security aspect of it, but if I am buying into this stuff why not go with the company who is well known to value personal privacy the most? You never know what your neighbors do in their free time...The fallacy of course is this; are you so arrogant that you believe people want to do this to you:
"intercept print jobs, file transfers, files in your unsecured shared folders, file backup systems"
I mean they can; but the truth is no-one cares about you enough to do it.
You're not special.
Have you ever used HomeKit? It really isn't a sad state of affairs.
People only make this statement when Apple aren't #1 for 'numbers'... funny that.
Home kit also turns lights on and off.. if Siri understands what your saying....
I don't need Apple to curate devices / decide whats best. I'd rather read up and find the product best for myself. Using Google Home, there are more devices available. More choice, which is better.
Please watch the film "Casino"You are likely right. 99.999% of people will never need to worry about the security aspect of it, but if I am buying into this stuff why not go with the company who is well known to value personal privacy the most? You never know what your neighbors do in their free time...
The biggest hurdle with HomeKit imo was the hardware authentication that was required. Now that they have changed that to a software component I think we will see HomeKit supported by more and more. Just recently the Insignia smart plugs gained HomeKit support.I didn't say HomeKit was a sad state of affairs, I meant the way Apple has managed and marketed HomeKit is a sad state of affairs.
If you look at a good number of smart home appliances, they don't even mention HomeKit, even if they are compatible. They mention Google Home, Alexa, and IFTTT compatibility. HomeKit documentation is often relegated to the FAQ's section.
If HomeKit has no brand recognition it will die. People fail to recognize what a huge liability Siri is to the future of Apple. If it continues to be terrible for much longer, Apple itself will go the way of Microsoft. Too late to catch up in any emerging tech, surviving off legacy reliance to grind through the fiscal quarters.
Oh I get that and I wish there was a mini home pod for people who aren't looking for sound systems. But in terms of what I can already integrate with a home pod vs the google mini, Apple still wins out regardless of how many products 'work' with google.Personally, I'd never trade my Google Home Minis for a HomePod. $49 is a lot easier to swallow than $349. If Siri had all of Google's smarts and then some, maybe I could talk myself into spending seven times more for the additional smarts and the vastly superior sound quality that HomePod provides over the tiny Google Home Mini. However, as both products sit today, there's not a chance in hell that HomePod is worth seven times more what a Google Home Mini costs -- at least as far as my household is concerned.
The fallacy of course is this; are you so arrogant that you believe people want to do this to you:
"intercept print jobs, file transfers, files in your unsecured shared folders, file backup systems"
I mean they can; but the truth is no-one cares about you enough to do it.
You're not special.
Or with homebridge, like 10,000 devices
Bad analogy. It's true that people generally watch only a handful of channels out of hundreds. But the right analogy here would be:This is like Cable TV. You may pay for 500 channels, but you only really watch only a handful. Google may have hooked up with 5000 services, but realistically if most people use a handful in the 200 that Apple supports, its covered.
Oh my God, you're right just because something is theoretically possible it means I've automatically fallen fowl to said hack and now I'm a bad internet citizen because I've unwittingly become part of the problem and I'm spoiling it for everyone else who are absolutely paranoid and can't see why everyone-one else isn't.No you are the ignorant/arrogant one . At best your insecure internal devices are being used as bots for DDoS attacks against sites by “for hire” hackers. At worst they have been compromised by hackers with automated script engines that can hop over to your computer(s) and collect personal info mainly for identity theft. I handle network security for a living and see this weekly. There’s plenty of good information on the Internet covering this in detail. Take the time to educate yourself.
First accurate thing you have said “I don't need Apple“.![]()
The fallacy of course is this; are you so arrogant that you believe people want to do this to you:
"intercept print jobs, file transfers, files in your unsecured shared folders, file backup systems"
I mean they can; but the truth is no-one cares about you enough to do it.
You're not special.