Maybe Apple is adding ads to offset the money they will lose from 3rd-party app stores and sideloading pirates?!?!?
🤣
🤣
Try again. Ads in the Music and Settings apps were put in place long ago. Apple Music ads were there at least 2 years ago.The implementation of the ads in Apple Maps we’re announced after the regulation of iOS in the EU. The cancer is the eu regulations now in stage 4. Thanks for an apt analogy.
Can’t stop laughing at this level of naïveté.(If you don’t agree to this, add your own comment with opposing view rather than disliking this one. This is my opinion.)
As long as main results are not suppressed and the ads are clearly marked and few in number, I’m fine with this. I trust Apple to not sell identifiable user data so no issues. We can’t escape ads anyway. Hoping Apple would pave the way for better ad handling.
Turn by turn -> selecting destination and having maps offer quickest route and voice over (if needed) when to change lanes, take exits etc . Maybe it’s my terminology that’s off 🧐Can you clarify what you mean by turn by turn navigation? My phone gives me every step (after this light turn left on the next light). But I see people say this so it must be some feature I dont understand.
It’s my opinion, tripling the ad revenue as apple states is in direct response to the impending loss of business in the EU.Try again. Ads in the Music and Settings apps were put in place long ago. Apple Music ads were there at least 2 years ago.
![]()
สล็อตเว็บตรง API แท้100% เว็บสล็อต อันดับ 1 แตกง่าย ไม่มีขั้นต่ำ
สล็อตเว็บตรงแท้ FAFA365 ฝากถอน ไม่มีขั้นต่ำ รองรับทรูวอเลท ไม่มีบัญชีธนาคารก็เข้าเล่นได้ เว็บสล็อต สมัครฟรี เล่นได้ครบทุกค่ายในเว็บเดียวthe8-bit.com
Don’t know when Settings had ads inserted, but they’re there too.
![]()
Apple promotes Apple Music, Apple Arcade in iOS Settings app
Apple device users who purchased a new iPhone 13, or who recently upgraded to the latest iOS 15 release, are seeing static Settings menu options advertising for first-party services Apple Music and Apple Arcade.appleinsider.com
We the customers are the losers in the bid of government to make iOS a public utility. Unfortunately ads in Apple Maps, imo, are a fallout of the governments that want to regulate apple to death.
Apple can make up whatever marketing-friendly reason they want, the fact is they started implementing ads in the OS years ago. You're of course free to willfully ignore that fact and swallow their misdirection hook, line, and sinker. After all, it's far from the most egregious example of someone ignoring reality for the sake one's own manufactured and distorted worldview.It’s my opinion, tripling the ad revenue as apple states is in direct response to the impending loss of business in the EU.
Imo, the customer loses bigger when big tech is micro regulated and innovation stunting regs such as making the iOS App Store a public utility are enacted. The customers are the losers in the long run. My iPhone is not like my electric company or cable company. I can buy android in a second. Competition keeps everybody honest.So we customers always lose no matter what. We lose if big tech companies are regulated because, according to them and many people, it stifles innovation. We lose if they aren’t regulated because they become more abusive of us customers over time as they become more greedy.
You of course are also free to ignore the statement about tripling apples as revenue was very recent.Apple can make up whatever marketing-friendly reason they want, the fact is they started implementing ads in the OS years ago. You're of course free to willfully ignore that fact and swallow their misdirection hook, line, and sinker. After all, it's far from the most egregious example of someone ignoring reality for the sake one's own manufactured and distorted worldview.
This is GOING to happen.Please dear lord no. We pay the ‘Apple Tax’ so that our systems are mostly devoid of bloatware and advertisements. Don’t destroy the platform, Apple.
There are very few things in the world that piss me off more than ads.This is GOING to happen.
Yes, I hate it. But it will happen for sure.
Come over to the Dark Side. No I don't mean android, I mean jailbreak/root.🤓I was thinking of swapping my iPhone 12 mini with the new 14Pro, but if this is correct, i will not do that. Then i will rather go over to other Brands (not Samsung), pay less for the phone, to be served ad’s.
It doesn't matter when Apple made the statement regarding tripling ad revenues when they had already been implementing ads in the OS for at least a couple years now. There's no change in Apple's behavior here except to expand upon what they were already doing long before any new laws were passed. If Apple had never put ads in the OS before you might have even a crumb of an argument. The fact is Wall Street expects never ending growth and this is simply Cook's attempt at continuing that expected growth for AAPL.You of course are also free to ignore the statement about tripling apples as revenue was very recent.
I understand what you’re saying. Many do not see the big picture.
Apple is under every right to do whatever they legally want. Nobody argued differently.No, what it shows is apple is under every right to keep its revenue stream, especially since the EU is attempting to place apples ip into the public domain and apple probably force apple to lose billions.
Apple made the statement they would have 50% of the mobile add revenue and compete against google in 2010. And there is only one way to compete against google and that’s by becoming them and selling relevant adds, it was just a question of when and how much will they sacrifice their privacy principlesIt doesn't matter when Apple made the statement regarding tripling ad revenues when they had already been implementing ads in the OS for at least a couple years now. There's no change in Apple's behavior here except to expand upon what they were already doing long before any new laws were passed. If Apple had never put ads in the OS before you might have even a crumb of an argument. The fact is Wall Street expects never ending growth and this is simply Cook's attempt at continuing that expected growth for AAPL.
This of course is aside from the original point I was making, which is that Apple will always choose $$$ over principles. The new EU law is a reality that Apple has to deal with and if nothing else was a real world test on what Apple values more, sticking to their principles or $$$. Assuming they believe they would stand to lose revenue from the law they had three options: a) eat the cost, b) try to recoup the lost revenue but require the plan adhere to their "principles", or c) try to recoup the lost revenue, the impact to their "principles" be damned. Apple chose option c because as I said Apple will choose money over principles. Assuming your opinion is correct, that Apple is doing this because of lost revenue due to new regulations, then you tacitly admit as much. You are free to defend Apple's abandonment of their principles in order to chase the $$$, however you don't get to pretend that Apple adhered to their principles, as when put to the test they blatantly did not do so.
Disagree on this fundamental point. The fact they are looking to triple their ad revenue, a recent revelation, can be seen to making up potential lost revenue in the EU and other jurisdictions.It doesn't matter when Apple made the statement regarding tripling ad revenues when they had already been implementing ads in the OS for at least a couple years now. […]
That’s not the point. Of course apple follows the laws. And if the law says your App Store belongs to me, your commissions belong to me, your sideloading belongs to me, apple has few choices.Apple is under every right to do whatever they legally want. Nobody argued differently.
Maybe or maybe not.But the reality is apple would have done this irrespective of Eu rulings.
Along with the usurping of App Store revenues.Hardware sales are stagnating as everyone practically have an iPhone already. And services are the biggest growth potential they have. This makes it the logical end results
![]()
The downfall of the walled garden: Here's why iAd failed | TechCrunch
Apple is the world’s most valuable company -- no other company even comes close. That shouldn’t be surprising, as the Silicon Valley-based company has created an unparalleled hardware culture that more resembles a lifestyle than a brand. Apple is potentially worth more than a trillion dollars...techcrunch.com
Apple have tried getting in the add space since 2010
Apple is under every right to do whatever they legally want. Nobody argued differently.
But the reality is apple would have done this irrespective of Eu rulings. Hardware sales are stagnating as everyone practically have an iPhone already. And services are the biggest growth potential they have. This makes it the logical end results
![]()
The downfall of the walled garden: Here's why iAd failed | TechCrunch
Apple is the world’s most valuable company -- no other company even comes close. That shouldn’t be surprising, as the Silicon Valley-based company has created an unparalleled hardware culture that more resembles a lifestyle than a brand. Apple is potentially worth more than a trillion dollars...techcrunch.com
Apple have tried getting in the add space since 2010
Apple has become a dumpster fire.