Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I remember when all you had to do was pick a storage option. Its getting a bit ridiculous if this is true! Does one require an SE? A Plus? A Pro? How about 16, 64, 128 or 256 GB of storage? Which colour? You can have grey, gold, pink, silver or luminous green? Yeah I'll have a 256GB luminous green iPhone Pro. Ta.
 
I remember when all you had to do was pick a storage option. Its getting a bit ridiculous if this is true! Does one require an SE? A Plus? A Pro? How about 16, 64, 128 or 256 GB of storage? Which colour? You can have grey, gold, pink, silver or luminous green? Yeah I'll have a 256GB luminous green iPhone Pro. Ta.
I remember when you didn't even have to choose a carrier. If you had an iPhone, you were on AT&T, and living in the USA. Ahh, the good old days. Now I can't look at my phone and know what country I'm in. Why do they have to make it so difficult!?
 
  • Like
Reactions: TRDmanAE86
Good point, but at least you know it's their 6th generation phone. The iPhone 7, on the other hand, will be the 10th generation iPhone. That makes zero sense.
What makes no sense is how people keep saying this every single year.
 
I remember when you didn't even have to choose a carrier. If you had an iPhone, you were on AT&T, and living in the USA. Ahh the good old days. Now I can't look at my phone and know what country I'm in. Why do they have to make it so difficult!?

It was the same in the UK. If you wanted an iPhone you were on O2, they were only available in 8 GB too. 16GBs didn't come along until a while after!
 
  • Like
Reactions: TRDmanAE86
Decoded, it says "This is going to cost you $100 more".
As it should.

You pay more... you get more. You don't have to buy that particular model though.

That's why Apple... and other companies... offer a range of products.
 
It was the same in the UK. If you wanted an iPhone you were on O2, they were only available in 8 GB too. 16GBs didn't come along until a while after!

That makes me feel old because I even remember having to activate my iPhone 3G through iTunes.

September is only six months away... Plenty of time for even more rumours and leaks between now and then!
 
I remember when all you had to do was pick a storage option. Its getting a bit ridiculous if this is true! Does one require an SE? A Plus? A Pro? How about 16, 64, 128 or 256 GB of storage? Which colour? You can have grey, gold, pink, silver or luminous green? Yeah I'll have a 256GB luminous green iPhone Pro. Ta.

I remember that too.

But I'm glad Apple offers various options today.

Apple is the 2nd largest smartphone OEM in the world. They couldn't be that if they offered limited choice.

Contrary to popular belief... one size does NOT fit all.
 
I remember that too.

But I'm glad Apple offers various options today.

Apple is the 2nd largest smartphone OEM in the world. They couldn't be that if they offered limited choice.

Contrary to popular belief... one size does NOT fit all.

More choice is good and I couldn't agree more! At the time it was this crazy new technology that we didn't know what to do with. Now, its grown massivley and we all use our phones for different purposes. I'm just surprised that, if true, they want to provide even more choice to a user. Apple has always been about simplicity. Don't quote me on this but I'm sure Tim said Apples secret is that you could fit all of the products they make onto one table. Now, the table will have to be pretty huge!!
 
More choice is good and I couldn't agree more! At the time it was this crazy new technology that we didn't know what to do with. Now, its grown massivley and we all use our phones for different purposes. I'm just surprised that, if true, they want to provide even more choice to a user. Apple has always been about simplicity. Don't quote me on this but I'm sure Tim said Apples secret is that you could fit all of the products they make onto one table. Now, the table will have to be pretty huge!!

But if a phone comes if 4 colors... it's still one phone.

The colors are just options. No need to make the table bigger :)

It's not 4 different products... it's one product that happens to come in 4 colors.

You're right... Apple has always been about simplicity.

But the market evolves. Like I said... you can't make ONE model that will appeal to EVERYONE. So Apple will add models and options when they see fit.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: MrJM
The Android community has had to deal with this for years.
Doesn't Android fragmentation refer to a billion Android devices in the world right now using up to 9 different generations of the OS?

I didn't think fragmentation referred to a couple models of a particular phone... or that model coming in various sizes, colors, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jax44
Just. Name. Them. Like. This.

iPhone Mini: 4" display
iPhone Air: 4.7" display
iPhone Pro: 5.5" display

iPad Mini: 7.9" display
iPad Air: 9.7" display
iPad Pro: 12.9" display

Is that so hard? I don't understand why the stupid naming conventions have to continue.
[doublepost=1456793420][/doublepost]
I want to buy "New iPhone 7s Plus Pro Mini 2 SE"
You forgot to add "retina"!
 
I think Apple should make the naming uniform and get rid of the silly numbers and letters. Also time to retire the "air" moniker because it has outgrown it's usefulness.

4" iPhone
4.7" iPhone
5.5" iPhone Pro
--
7" iPad
10" iPad
13" iPad Pro
--
12" Macbook
14" Macbook
16" Macbook Pro

Between generations, the enthusiasts that care about the nitty gritty can differentiate the same way we do now with Macbooks. I.e., Early 2016, Late 2017, etc.

I seriously believe Apple is going away from naming things iPad 3, or iPhone 7 and just naming them iPhone.

It seems like it may have been quickly forgotten that Apple really has tried that in recent memory, and (fairly hilariously predictably) failed. Doesn't anyone/everyone remember "The New iPad" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPad_(3rd_generation) )? They were going to break away from the tyranny of sequential numbering (although everyone would just come to refer to it as, yep, iPad 3). But what was next year's going to be called? The New New iPad? Well, it was the "iPad with Retina Display" (aka iPad 4), owing to that new feature and to the fact that a differentiable name was and is genuinely necessary across product generations, both from a new product marketing standpoint and with the understanding that names functionally have to differ in some clear way to allow for clarity in support, service, discussion, resale, whathaveyou. So what they were seemingly trying to accomplish with "The New iPad" quest to get rid of the numbers was shown to be utterly quixotic. The next year, with no new headline feature, the new product was then named "iPad Air", in a way only confusingly related to the MacBook Air product line, which was a separate, distinct line from existing MacBooks/MacBook Pros, one far lighter and more stripped down than those still-offered alternatives. (It was/is quintessentially Microsoftian in it unconsidered way, akin to the days when Microsoft would slap Windows on everything, and then Live, and why not some Windows Live, too, on nearly every unrelated product line (Windows and all its variations, Windows Explorer, Windows Azure, Windows Mobile, Windows Azure, Microsoft Live, Microsoft Office Live, Microsoft Xbox Live, Microsoft Live Messenger, Live Search, frameworks, services, mobile OSes, and on and on beyond parody).

And the year after that, iPad Air 2. :) Because, you know what, sequential numbers are actually pretty handy for naming sequential products.

(And oneMadRssn, I generally agree with the wisdom and clarity of your naming scheme above, based on Apple's current and likely future lineup (and disuse for the useless-due-to-overuse of the "Air" term)... but I think experience and practicality dictates that an impulse to get rid of generation-signifying numbers is, again, quixotic. They could, of course, always use years in the name instead, like automobile manufacturers... because that worked out so well for Apple before, too: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ILife o_O )
 
Just. Name. Them. Like. This.

iPhone Mini: 4" display
iPhone Air: 4.7" display
iPhone Pro: 5.5" display

iPad Mini: 7.9" display
iPad Air: 9.7" display
iPad Pro: 12.9" display

Is that so hard? I don't understand why the stupid naming conventions have to continue.

I couldn't agree more. I'd love to see exactly that product lineup with those exact names you listed and even over to the Mac where I'm hoping Apple can match that too:

MacBook mini: 12"
MacBook Air: 14"
MacBook Pro: 16"

Mac mini
Mac Air
Mac Pro

Yes, I actually do want to see the iMac name go away. The name doesn't make sense in 2016 when Apple is clearly trying to solidify both iOS and OS X products as separate and distinguishable entities.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flow39
More choice is good and I couldn't agree more! At the time it was this crazy new technology that we didn't know what to do with. Now, its grown massivley and we all use our phones for different purposes. I'm just surprised that, if true, they want to provide even more choice to a user. Apple has always been about simplicity. Don't quote me on this but I'm sure Tim said Apples secret is that you could fit all of the products they make onto one table. Now, the table will have to be pretty huge!!

They should get rid of the big table that has every model of the Apple watch under glass. It takes up a lot of room for a non interactive display.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pat500000
To keep things lively here at MacRumors, I think it would be great if the Plus version of the iPhone had better features and specs than the standard version and even better if the smaller one had less features than the the standard one. Image the chaos it would create here!! :D
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.