It knows where you're looking, right? Look at the one you want to 'mirror', tap your fingers... boom!If there are multiple compatible Macs, how will it identify which one you are looking at?
It knows where you're looking, right? Look at the one you want to 'mirror', tap your fingers... boom!If there are multiple compatible Macs, how will it identify which one you are looking at?
Yes, It does offer that functionality and it is suprisingly good. Very usable but Apple will kil it herte.I've been reviewing the Quest 3, but still don't get it. Does it already offer the same immersive experience that the Vision Pro offers, with "screens" floating in space? How well does that work? How do the Macs broadcast their screens?
I've heard others say that the resolution is a bit like looking at 720p monitors (~@7:30) with the meta quest pro. And the passthrough is not quite good enough to like read papers or your phone screen (@4:30).Yes, It does offer that functionality and it is suprisingly good. Very usable but Apple will kil it herte.
I wonder if this is going to work with Macs that contain Intel Chip.
I've been reviewing the Quest 3, but still don't get it. Does it already offer the same immersive experience that the Vision Pro offers, with "screens" floating in space? How well does that work? How do the Macs broadcast their screens?
Compressed 4K too much bandwidth for a local wireless network? Are you sure? Isn’t that how all these streaming games work nowadays?Too much bandwidth for wireless. I think they could have allowed the mac to project multiple low quality display streams, but only the one you focus at is at 4k.
When using it with your mac, can you use the mac keyboard and track pad? Or is it only for the wireless keyboard and magic mouse?
Why did the Apple employees think that Vision Pro was not ready?
If there are multiple compatible Macs, how will it identify which one you are looking at?
Not for wireless in the open band at 60GHz. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WiGigToo much bandwidth for wireless. I think they could have allowed the mac to project multiple low quality display streams, but only the one you focus at is at 4k.
Because the entire DAMN POINT of unveiling it at a DEVELOPER conference is to ensure that the day it is released there is a wide range of apps and content available. Duh!A glorious demo is entirely different than a ready-to-release tech product. Special effects people could have made Vpro wearers walk on water, raise the dead, fly, etc too.
Note Apple's admission of when it will be for sale. If it's "ready" why will it not be buyable until next year?
Theoretically, yes, but the „monitor“ will go dark after two hours 😊Wonder if this works with the Mac Mini. Would be an ideal setup not having to have a separate monitor.
Because the entire DAMN POINT of unveiling it at a DEVELOPER conference is to ensure that the day it is released there is a wide range of apps and content available. Duh!
Theoretically, yes, but the „monitor“ will go dark after two hours 😊
hmm, I sure would hope you can use keyboard/mouse of the Mac, but after re-reading the article not so sure anymore.I may have dreamed it but it appeared there was a brief shot of the users hands on the physical keyboard. If so, that's an AR overlay using the cameras to capture their own hands using the actual keyboard + mouse/trackpad so that it looks as it does when we are doing it sans-Goggles.
But that's probably worth a re-watch. I think I saw it but I've looked at a LOT of stuff about this topic in the last few weeks and may be 'blurring' something seen for some other VR product. I certainly hope it works that way.
You can connect Mac accessories to the Vision Pro, including the Magic Keyboard and the Magic Trackpad for input purposes.
hmm, I sure would hope you can use keyboard/mouse of the Mac, but after re-reading the article not so sure anymore.
Don't believe everything you read.Why did the Apple employees think that Vision Pro was not ready?
Wouldn’t it have to if you can rip a Mac app off the screen of the Mac and look at it through Vision Pro? Although, on second thought, I guess the Mac is still running the app and the Vision Pro is just acting as a screen, essentially.I believe I read somewhere that it also runs macOS apps. Anyone find more info on if/what macOS apps are natively supported?
Why not? It has an M2 chip….I'm wondering if there's an actual Xcode developer environment built in with a Unix terminal, without having to go through a Mac.
This was a totally cool feature and was a total surprise. Kudos Apple! But no goggles for me!
I’m not a techie, but I’d think it would be odd to limit an M2 device to an M3 Mac. No? Even if you think Apple does arbitrarily limit compatibility…it would look truly strange.I'll ask the scarier(?) question: I wonder if this is going to work with Macs that contain <M3 chips.
We know Apple Inc. If this launches next year, we will probably be within the M3 rollout. We know how "new features" seem to magically require new hardware (even when hackers can later make old hardware do some of it just fine). There's plenty of letters in the alphabet still free for a new "custom chip" so that "only Apple can do this."
There was a LOT of sales of M1 Macs (myself included). Would Apple dare draw some functional line at M2... or even M3? Limited functionality of Macs BEFORE M3? I'll hope not with the optimists but I'm always thinking about that "maximize revenue" motivation that can make them make choices that don't exactly delight us consumers.