Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Hmmm... so is this the end for 4:3 ipad displays? This is bad news if you ask me. I've held many tablets in my life and 4:3 always felt the most natural to me, being comfortable in both landscape and portrait.
 
Yes. This icon pretty much confirms it. These will be the first iPads with a screen size not 4:3 since the very first iPad. The new screen ratio seems to be close to 7:5
They probably need to so the device is wide enough for a keyboard on the small model. 4:3 is perfect, I wish it was the ratio of laptops.
[doublepost=1533199936][/doublepost]
I can't wait to find out what other useful things Apple will remove in the coming iterations.
Home button is useful? It’s time has come. It’s the most unreliable part of devices and it takes up too much room. Gestures are much quicker anyways.
[doublepost=1533200115][/doublepost]
You’re crazy if you think Apple is giving us a “peek” at an unreleased device.
You think they accidentally add those icons to iOS builds? They would have to be the dumbest company to keep doing it. The leaks build excitement for nerds like us while not being big enough leaks to become mainstream news like the iPhone 4 leak.
[doublepost=1533200207][/doublepost]
I used to be a big, big iPad advocate but ever since getting the 12-inch MacBook, I barely even touch the iPad. Months and months of non-use. It's ironic because I've reverted to a setup that a lot of people back in 2010 said was ideal: A notebook and a smartphone. That's it. Well, an Apple Watch too, but as far as the iPad goes for me, my mind reels to think how it could fit in my lineup.
It will always be a superior video device because of native apps and battery life. Hell you still need to use flash to watch services like HBO on a Mac.
 
So, the home button is really disappearing. Guess so will the audio-port.

Things like this are similar to automotive makers replacing a radio volume knob with a rocker button or two buttons or screen-enacted controls. Some things are just plain better with an instantaneous button or knob or dedicated headphone or MagSafe port, and too often lately, Apple is letting forced-innovacion get in the way of convenient, flexible use for the user. And it is getting to be a real drag.
[doublepost=1533200903][/doublepost]
Home button is useful? It’s time has come. It’s the most unreliable part of devices and it takes up too much room. Gestures are much quicker anyways.

Moving your finger, swiping, and tapping is quicker than resting your thumb on the button and giving it a quick tap?

Too much room? Are you looking for a completely borderless device because it seems like a really cool idea, or because the borders pose some kind of usability problem that’s decreasing the enjoyment and function of your iPad? Just honestly curious.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KPandian1
Not sure about Face ID in this instance. Because many people - myself included - use an iPad Pro laying flat (or slightly raised) and in landscape mode. Will we have to pick up the iPad or lean over it and rotate to portrait every time to unlock?

In screen fingerprint reader and no face ID :) That would cause some drama.
 
This looks cool!

Not too keen on the rumoured relocation of the smart connector. The iPad really shines as a landscape device, for browsing, typing and general light computing. Anyway, I will reserve my judgement until I see it.

The main problem for Apple however, is that my Air 2 still works flawlessly. My iPhone 6 on the other hand, does not. Various crashes, poor battery life and general sluggishness means this year will be all about the new iPhones for me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tozovac
Things like this are similar to automotive makers replacing a radio volume knob with a rocker button or two buttons or screen-enacted controls. Some things are just plain better with an instantaneous button or knob or dedicated headphone or MagSafe port, and too often lately, Apple is letting forced-innovacion get in the way of convenient, flexible use for the user. And it is getting to be a real drag.
[doublepost=1533200903][/doublepost]

Moving your finger, swiping, and tapping is quicker than resting your thumb on the button and giving it a quick tap?

Too much room? Are you looking for a completely borderless device because it seems like a really cool idea, or because the borders pose some kind of usability problem that’s decreasing the enjoyment and function of your iPad? Just honestly curious.

On the X i just swipe up and it's unlocked.

Every time i use the iPad it feels so ancient and dated with the button. Just does not feel right anymore, because every other interaction with the device is by touching the screen.

Surprisingly annoying with Apps like Lastpass, which are locked by Touch/FaceID. On the X they will just unlock automatically. On the iPad you have to put the finger on the button.

Getting to the App Switcher with a swipe is also much more fluid and convenient than pressing a button twice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: enc0re and Tozovac
Love the design, now to decide whether to sell my iPad Pro Gen 2 12.9 or iPad Pro 9.7. I'm siding on keeping the ''classic'' 9.7, will give it a few more days thought.
 
>>> Why would Apple have changed the placement of [--] symbols on iPad if there isn't going to be a notch?
>> I think just to keep it consistent across iOS.
> But they could have done it with iOS 11 then, no?

Maybe they wanted other manufacturers to think there's going to be a notch on new iPads.
 
I still prefer the Hone Button, but if the new iPad has NO (stupid) notch, I'm in! Cool news, if true.
 
If the new dimensions are as depicted in this graphic then I'd seriously contemplate upgrading to 12.9. The footprint doesn't look all that much bigger than the existing 10.5 inch modelView attachment 774053

Somehow it makes the 12.9 look massively outdated, look at the size reduction. This design and those A series processors, probably half the price of a Macbook Pro 13'' and benchmarking similar numbers :) (yes I know Mac OS and iOS do different things - it just strengthens the case for A Series chips and iPhone X and iPad Pro design language to be translated back to the Mac product line).
 
Somehow it makes the 12.9 look massively outdated, look at the size reduction. This design and those A series processors, probably half the price of a Macbook Pro 13'' and benchmarking similar numbers :) (yes I know Mac OS and iOS do different things - it just strengthens the case for A Series chips and iPhone X and iPad Pro design language to be translated back to the Mac product line).
Pulled the post as on reflection it looked a little 'off' and perhaps misrepresented the actual reductions. Seemed to overstate the reductions and the size vs existing models and not totally reflecting the dimensions in the article
 
I hope they release it in September so I can take advantage of the Back-to-School program.
 
If you’re using the Apple Pencil in ProCreate that would be very clunky at first
But if you’re drawing you’re probably not using the home button very often.
First of all, letting your thumb rest on a home button while watching in landscape mode and giving a quick press takes absolutely zero effort, I can’t think of anything easier. Having to move your hand to swipe up to get the home button and then give it another tap to enact it to, say, see the home screen, is typical Apple fashion of making the user perform more physical moves to do the same thing that used to take one move. Those small additions and increases in effort to do what used to be instantaneous Is getting to be a real drag, just for the sake of removing some physical button or port or hinged trackpad or other feature in the name of innovation. I think apples engineers are, too often, trying to think of new ideas when sitting in laboratories instead of focusing on how users actually use their devices, and again, it’s getting to be a real drag.
resting your thumb at the bottom is just as simple as the home button. Also, going home is a single swipe in iOS 12. Once you get used to swiped than buttons feel archaic. If getting rid of the home button is what it takes to get rid of the bezels then it’s more than worth it. Don’t you agree?
 
I hope they release it in September so I can take advantage of the Back-to-School program.

I don’t think they will. I think with the Apple Watch refresh imminent, three new iPhones, that alone will be a large portion of the keynote, having very little time to actually demo and explain the new iPads with face ID/form factor changes. Which the iPad very well could be a separate event similar to the past in October or November of this year, or; Spring 2019.
 
Moving your finger, swiping, and tapping is quicker than resting your thumb on the button and giving it a quick tap?

Too much room? Are you looking for a completely borderless device because it seems like a really cool idea, or because the borders pose some kind of usability problem that’s decreasing the enjoyment and function of your iPad? Just honestly curious.

Because it’s a mobile device and increasing the screen to bezel ratio is always an advantage. It will still have some bezel it will just be smaller on the top and bottom. I don’t see how this is and.
 
On the X i just swipe up and it's unlocked.

Every time i use the iPad it feels so ancient and dated with the button. Just does not feel right anymore, because every other interaction with the device is by touching the screen.

Thanks for that, I wasn't sure how the X works. It's good that things work well for various users! Me, I strongly prefer the button on my 5S because let lets me maintain a strong grip and pressing with my thumb is much easier than swiping. If Apple maintained a "caveman iPhone" like the SE with headphone jacks and a button and non-slippery grippy sides and a great size, then all would be great. The trouble is when Apple forces "revolutionary" courageous ideas across the board because they are Apple...
 
Given the increasing use of authentication for features such as iCloud Keychain, Face ID promises to be more convenient than Touch ID. I would then be able to confirm the use of my password simply by looking at my device (something I am already doing anyways) rather than move my fingers to approve using Touch ID.

Basically fewer movements and actions required overall, result in less friction in using said device.
 
resting your thumb at the bottom is just as simple as the home button. Also, going home is a single swipe in iOS 12. Once you get used to swiped than buttons feel archaic. If getting rid of the home button is what it takes to get rid of the bezels then it’s more than worth it. Don’t you agree?

Thanks for the nice reply. Honestly I'd have to understand why removing bezels is good or a "feature," to be honest, before being able to answer. If the answer is: more screen for the same footprint/form factor, well, OK, but that's overlooking the trade-offs that can be very important to some. Me, I use my 5S one-handed often and the button with its slight depression allows me additional security of holding it when I move my thumb to press. Often when I swipe up with my thumb, I have to stop and watch what I'm doing because my phone is less secure and could be dropped. That's just me, and it'd be great if options existed - button/headphonejack/bezels for some, 100% screen for others.
 
Given the increasing use of authentication for features such as iCloud Keychain, Face ID promises to be more convenient than Touch ID. I would then be able to confirm the use of my password simply by looking at my device (something I am already doing anyways) rather than move my fingers to approve using Touch ID.

Basically fewer movements and actions required overall, result in less friction in using said device.

And if you want to reject the request? You look away and to hit the cancel button, you randomly tap on screen to hit it?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.