Are Honda civics the most expensive car on the market, no. Then not really an apt comparison.
Think your referring to Samsung there.
I was going for the bland vanilla.... it’s getting boring angle. Cost has nothing to do with it
Are Honda civics the most expensive car on the market, no. Then not really an apt comparison.
Think your referring to Samsung there.
Making a phone fold isn't innovation, it's just a novelty. And it will die off just like Windows Phone.Say what you want about Samsung... at least they are innovating.... what’s Apple doing besides adding a freaking camera lense
It’s no way I’m upgrading from my mid spec XS Max this year
Say what you want about Samsung... at least they are innovating.... what’s Apple doing besides adding a freaking camera lense
69Mustang. I usually line up with your thinking -- but not this time.If you give me a CMaier X1000 Turbo Max Pro pre-production model for review and I turn it over to Timber Tear It Open for a teardown, you have every right to get all up in my colon and tell me to 1. get your property back and 2. get that teardown off the internet. You didn't give the X1000 TMP to Timber, I did. If I want to keep getting access to your products then I will correct my error because it wasn't my right to give your property to Timber. I want to remain in your good graces and Timber wants to remain in my good graces. The teardown gets torn down.
When you ship the X1000 TMP, Timber purchases one for teardown... as they normally do for all their teardowns... of products on sale... which your X1000 TMP was not.
To answer your AirPower question... ifixit would not be allowed to tear it down and publish unless they got explicit permission from Apple. Otherwise the would be in possession of potentially stolen IP and subject to legal action. AirPower? That legal action would be swift and unrelenting.
I’m sorry, but I think Samsung’s engineers and PR department would disagree in this instance. That’s a great mantra in many instances, but not after you mock others’ missteps and then have the stones to charge $2000 for broken prototypes.Exactly. Better to try than not try at all. I laughed so hard when Apple released APFS. REALLY? A stupid file system? True Tone? Force Touch? 3D Touch? When Apple gimmicks they gimmick haaaard.
Making a phone fold isn't innovation, it's just a novelty. And it will die off just like Windows Phone.
Exactly. Better to try than not try at all. I laughed so hard when Apple released APFS. REALLY? A stupid file system? True Tone? Force Touch? 3D Touch? When Apple gimmicks they gimmick haaaard.
Smart man... usually. Not this time though.69Mustang. I usually line up with your thinking -- but not this time.
Because we don't know the terms and conditions signed by the intermediary I stated: potentially stolen IP, not stolen IP.iFixit did not receive stolen goods. [We do not know the T&Cs signed by the intermediary, who did.]
What iFixit does is teardown products that are on the market. It's why they buy what they teardown. They don't destroy other's property... especially without permission. In this case they did, and they did it to property they had no right to destroy.Either way, iFixIt did what it does.
Maybe, just maybe, Samsung should have contracted iFixIt for a teardown before the fold's public release.
They did find the weaknesses a-priori, after all.
Is that really how long they’ve been working on this phone?
In other words, completely redesign a product they’ve been working on for years, and then figure out if people will want one?
Considering that despite everything the (current) Galaxy Fold won't be used by anyone I think it is fair that Samsung asks for the tear up removal.
But from a PR perspective it would be smarter for Samsung to just let it be. It is not like anyone won't notice what a screwed up almost launch that this was. In fact with this request they are just helping everyone remind even better.
Say what you want about Samsung... at least they are innovating.... what’s Apple doing besides adding a freaking camera lense
It’s no way I’m upgrading from my mid spec XS Max this year
To be fair, though, this was already going to be a 2-day story, as it was supposed to go on sale today.The saying in politics is "never let a one-day story become a two-day story." This turns a one-day story into a two-day story, as there will now be articles like this one that remind us of the screen debacle. I'm a case-in-point, as I had not heard about the teardown at issue. Now I have, and now I know it was unfavorable to Samsung.
I'm designing a triple fold phone down to a post-it note size, it may suck and haven't work out the details yet, want to buy one? It's very innovated. ;-)
I still don't understand how the testing process works in those companies (Samsung, Apple). Just put those devices into pockets of the employees and analyze the results after few months. Every new device is just so secret they can't even test it in real life... and here are the consequences.
Samsung can request anything they want. II do not get it, iFix it did not do anything wrong, so while Samsung can Ask to take it down, they cannot "request", unless it was a demo unit with NDA.....
I look forward to the day I can have a roll up screenAnother rush job, another fail. If only they'd announced it at the end of 2017 and still been unable to release it
/s
[doublepost=1556277992][/doublepost]
In the words of Ian Malcolm...
"Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether they could, they didn't stop to think if they should."
I'm aware they make some TVs and exploding washing machines.