Originally posted by jholzner
I completely agree. Any singe one of those apps is worth 50 bucks and we get them all for that. Apple has to make money on these things...or at least make a smaller lose. I'm sure that any other company could not develope and sell these things for this cheap.
Originally posted by Some_Big_Spoon
Exactly. Right on the head.
Originally posted by jernie
Well, if we are going to share photos through Iphoto, it is time to make a windows version, too.
On the whole I like the new Ilife. But the remark that 50% of the households have a musician, doesn't seem to make much sense. I play the french horn. So? Now I can play french horn through a keyboard?
I would have thought that, from now on, all retail copies of Panther will include the new iLife versions including GarageBand (iDVD is not included obviously).Originally posted by Some_Big_Spoon
it's been said before, and it will be said countless thousands of times to come: Mac OSX now Costs $180, not $129.
"iLife" or the applications that it encompasses, are much of the reason people use a mac.. that reason will now cost an additional $49 on top of the $129 cost that we all JUST paid..
I know, Apple's a company and does give a crap about us in reality, but man, this is just right in your face..
Originally posted by Stella
iApps are now payware for updates.
Disappointment.
Originally posted by Ling
And two...the work put inot garage band. It looks like a really kick-*** program.
I definitely think that it's worth 30 bucks just to get a functional version of iPhoto and Garage Band.
Originally posted by TMay
iTunes is always available as a download. The question is whether iPhoto will be. Steve said nothing about downloads one way or another.
Chill until there's some more information.
To those that aren't musically inclined, and therefore haven't any use for Garageband.
I'm not musically inclined, but, I still expect to get something out of Garageband using the loops to create soundtracks and voice over. A bit better than creating it in iMovie (even though I will be using FCE).
To put things in perspective: I just spent $14K on Pro/e upgrades plus $9k on forward maintenance, and, with the exception of Pro/Concept, I have to run this on a PC (VPC?). Count our blessings that at least you have the choice of purchasing iLife for the mac.
Originally posted by numediaman
If you already own a G5 then I guess it was an OK Keynote. But if you are in the market for a new desktop, laptop or display, you have to go somewhere else. All in all, I can't imagine being more disappointed in Apple.
As an aside, Jobs, as usual, did a great job. He is certainly the coolest CEO out there. Too bad he had nothing to announce.
Originally posted by sketchy
This is not new. I have a first gen FP iMac and I would have had to pay to get iDVD/iMovie upgraded. I think iPhoto will be free, but garage band, and the two previous listed, will not.
iPhoto and iTunes are switching applications, and they are the most used. I really doubt apple will charge for wither of them. and they will never charge for Safari.
I don't see the fuss. the apps are realyl good. if you think 49 is tooooo much you can purchase PS Elememts, I think roxio has some DVD software, and Peak LE to do the same type of stuff. I think that will be around 300 dollars.
Originally posted by Ivo
Did I miss something or did Steve Jobs not spend one word on the fact that iTunes Music Store still works in the US only?
Originally posted by mike czech
WHY is Apple using "Microsoft Office" in it's description for iLife?!?!?!?
Originally posted by Some_Big_Spoon
Yes, but it's not $100, it's $150, $49+$99.. then you have to take into account the $129 OS update.. plus the mind boggling premium we spend on the hardware...
Originally posted by Lancetx
I know people are complaining because they can't get something for free, but frankly Apple can do whatever they want, nobody is entitled to a free update to iMovie or iPhoto (unless they buy a new Mac starting today of course).
Originally posted by Lancetx
And no one is putting a gun to anyone's head forcing them to buy anything either. It seems like every complaint I'm reading today is based on price, whether it's the iPod mini or the iLife suite. Bottom line is that it's a free enterprise, Apple can charge whatever they like and it's your choice whether or not to buy what they're selling.
Personally I think I'll pay up the $49 for the iLife suite because it's a pretty good deal when you compare it to any other remotely similar software package available for the Mac or for Windows either for that matter. I know people are complaining because they can't get something for free, but frankly Apple can do whatever they want, nobody is entitled to a free update to iMovie or iPhoto (unless they buy a new Mac starting today of course).
I don't see Microsoft or anybody else offering an equivalent to the iLife suite for less than $49, nor do I see Rio/Dell/Creative or anyone else offering anything comparable to the iPod mini for less than $249 either. So I really don't see why there is so much bitching going on today, it's certainly not justified at all... 🙄
Originally posted by QCassidy352
ah, it's funny that you were posting this just as I posted my last message. It doesn't matter if the bitching is justified. Suddenly charging for formerly free software pisses people off. And pissed off customers are customers who aren't going to buy from you again. And that's a problem for apple. "Justified" and "reasonable" have nothing to do with it.