Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Never ask that question.




I can see it now.... Macs with ARM inside, which require annual replacements to a non-user replaceable battery in order to maintain their advertised / original speed lest the CPU be throttled to avoid a random sudden shutdown that would otherwise result in a potential loss of user data.

Oh what fun ....

Given that apple’s chips suck less power than intel’s, switching to A12 or whatever would be a step up for battery management.
 
Intel doesn’t guarantee any particular performance but they do advertise and market things like benchmarks and times for various tasks. Could be false advertising. Also could be exposure if anyone had their **** stolen because of it.
The latter some may be able to prove, given they have enough financial resources to hire the right experts. As to the former, I think that that is where most of the class actions will come from. And that is where most will fail unless there are insider documents that suddenly come forth.

This is going to be a PR and financial nightmare for Intel. This is going to get really ugly. Will Intel be able to weather the storm? We shall see.
 
  • Like
Reactions: centauratlas
This means the next gen of Intel chips will be 5-30% "faster" just for not having the design flaw.

Permabull idiots would call this "bullish news" and buy INTC :rolleyes:
 
For Macs, the impact is unknown at this point.

Is the Intel CPU clock speed guaranteed (by Intel in writing) to perform at X speed in all applications for the end user? If there is such a guarantee from Intel for the original owner, a person might have standing. Otherwise, the plaintiff would have to show by a preponderance of the evidence, that Intel knowingly sold defective CPU's. And in doing so, perpetrated fraud on the consumer, as well as putting the consumer at risk or was the subsequent cause for said consumer to suffer financial harm etc.

I have no doubt that class action suits will be filed by the end of the week. Proving damages is a whole different legal story.
Well let's see, Intel didn't issue an immediate recall of all unsold supply. So that would mean that they are currently selling products that they know to be defective. Further, the question has to be when did Intel learn of the issue. I bought my MBP 15 days ago. Lucky me, I'm exactly one day outside my return window. But I would be willing to bet quite a bit that they've known about this issue for much longer than that, considering that fixes for Windows and Linux are already underway. Think about it for a second, did Microsoft call in their Windows development team in the middle of Christmas to get started on this fix? It's far more likely that they got started before the holidays.

Finally, it is WAAY too coincidental that this news broke on the first business day of 2018.
 
Doesn’t this mean that Intel will lose in lawsuits? A 30% performance hit is really bad for cpu intensive games and applications

It isn’t just that average Joe computer owner would suffer. Amazon, Microsoft, Google, Apple and any company running servers would seriously suffer. This would cost them real money. So yeah, there would be a lawsuit, a huge lawsuit backed by some very wealthy companies.
 
This is a vindication of Apple's increasingly clear shift away from Intel who have been unreliable and have been holding Apple back like AMD did when Apple moved to Intel.

With the news that Apple is enabling universal iOS/Mac apps, the roadmap is becoming clear. The next MacBook will probably run exclusively on an A chip with existing apps running in x86 emulation. Rosetta comes full circle.

Pro hardware will run on dual chips to give developers time to build their pro apps for A chips. The new iMac Pro already has an Apple designed co-processor. I wonder if the upcoming Mac Pro will be the big reveal: a massively powered A chip running alongside an Intel chip.

This proves PowerPC was not such a bad processor.. moving to intel seemed logical, but now we are seeing the beginning and end to Intel.
 
Slowdowns you say? Maybe my MBP will see improved battery life. ;)

I get the joke - but odds are it'll be the opposite, since the solution is to replace a frequent process previously handled by hardware over to software.

And odds are this issue is going to affect the next couple iterations of Intel chips as well, given the hardware development lead times. Plus if Intel rushes a fix so the upcoming chips are unaffected, then odds are they'll screw something else up.

This is a huge deal. Thanks, Intel!
 
Another feather in Apple's Processor Design Group's hat. News like this will only bolster Apple's efforts to design and fab their own silicon designs, as they've done with the iOS devices.

Expect to see Apple-designed procs in computers within 3-5 years, starting with something like the MacBook Air, or the cheapest MacBook Pro/iMac. They will work up until the entire line of products is sold with their own processor designs.

What a way to turn the Mac into an absolute joke.
 
  • Like
Reactions: potassium404
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.