re: Can it play YouTube videos?
Better question; Will it blend?
Oh, wait .....
Better question; Will it blend?
Oh, wait .....
Can it play Youtube videos?![]()
Can it play Youtube videos?![]()
So to keep the machine running quiet (which may or may not matter to some customers -- but that's beyond the point) they stuck with a mobile GPU instead.
i thought this thread is about Intel Core i5 Quad-Core iMac Begins Shipping, mm must have been wrong *sigh*
Frankly, the current Mac Pro and the current MacBook Pro could go a decade in their current forms and I'd love them just as much. They're just that good.
Timeless design is...timeless.
Even 9+ years later, the industrial design of the tower does not look dated.
Oh and that
MAX SUCK MAN JEEZ WINDOWS PWNZ I MEAN 90% OF THE FREAKING WORLD MAN CAN'T BE WRONG I MEAN PWNZORSZ MAN PWZORZZZZZ NOOB LOL ROFLMAO
MAX SUCK MAN JEEZ WINDOWS PWNZ I MEAN 90% OF THE FREAKING WORLD MAN CAN'T BE WRONG I MEAN PWNZORSZ MAN PWZORZZZZZ NOOB LOL ROFLMAO
so the iMac had to stay with the Mobility Radeon HD 48x0 series. NVIDIA wasn't an option due to various reasons.
90% of the world purchase and choose Windows over Macs on a daily basis and world's biggest corporations run their company on PCs, I'd say it appears than an overwhelmingly large number of people in the world choose a proper hardware over an obsolete overpriced piece of a computer even if it has a quality IPS screen because you know people do stuff with their computer and want to be fast rather staring at a screen
It hurts when 90% of the world flat out rejects you in a market you created yourself!
Yea, and 90% of corporations choose the white Ford Taurus as their company car. Should we all buy one then? I always look at corporations and IS departments for thought leadership. NOT!
Most corporations just need a browser window to access their legacy applications anyway. Not exactly stiff hardware requirements there.
No doubt PC hardware is state of the art, however....it means squat when the OS sucks balls.
OSX is no better than Windows 7, in general, and in many ways is quite a bit behind.
I usually stay out of these flame wars, but this was so funny it made tea come out of my nose.I'm an Oracle DBA that has done contract work for many customers, some very large. 90% of these companies use UNIX. I did some 'rescue' work for a well known womens makeup company that tried to do clustered Oracle on Windows. Bless their hearts, they poured a ton of money into getting it working correctly. I have heard some good things about Windows 7, but lets face it anything is going to look great compared to Vista.
I currently own a 2 year old iMac that I'm selling to get a new one. Yes, really, I'm selling it! All my old PCs just went into the trash. For years I bought PCs but after my last one gave out I swore I would never buy another. I lied, I just bought an HP laptop. First thing I did was wipe the drive of Vista and put Linux and vmware on it. Now it's a good laptop.
UNIX, whatever flavor you choose - Solaris, AIX, HP-UX, Mac OS X and even Linux are light years ahead of Windows.
Apart form the fact that oracle is designed for use on Unix. thats like saying KDE sucks because it wont run on Windows.
Doesn't matter what software you run on it the OS is flawed. Windows started down the wrong path when they tried to put an interface on DOS. Although I liked DOS it never crashed on me.
Ok then, Linux sucks because it wont run Office 2007.
MorphingDragon said:Ok then, Linux sucks because it wont run Office 2007.
Why would you want to run Office 2007?
Hahaha, nice one kb27973, so funny, its like all the Microsoft Boys that troll threads in this forum, they are so blinkered to Microsoft software, they think we all really need / want it.