This works just like the Twitter integration, YOU have to sign in. YOU have to give explicit permission for FB to integrate. This does not happen IF YOU DON'T SIGN IN.
Just like the Twitter integration.
Again... Don't sign in. Simples.
Why is this so hard to understand?
Explain to me how Facebook is going to "track you" if you don't sign in for FB integration? Please. Explain how.
w00master
I really don't know if "W00master" and others are just recent switchers who know little about Macs and iOS, or if they really believe what they are saying.
As I explained above, it would be extremely simple if we were talking about a single social networking app that you can activate or not. But as the main article already states:
"tons of apps use Facebook for sign-ups and authentication (many use Facebook as the only way to do this, to the dismay of some)"
He asked me for examples; but I won't do that for two basic reasons:
- It's far too easy and obvious to find these hundreds if not thousands of "FB-driven apps"; so just do your own homework instead of asking for others to show you that;
- I had a horrible day dealing with kidney stones.
My point being, again: system-level support for FB will simply increase, on an exponential basis, the number of apps forcing you to not only use FB, but worse, to expose such app usage on your main page (sorry, wife and friends make me have a FB account, which is fine for social exchanges but NOT fine for showing private usage patterns).
As for comparisons with Twitter, they are totally uncalled for and inapplicable to the case in question. Twitter is just a short public message vehicle, and it does not make you publish every single thing you do in a given day. FB, on the other hand, pervades through thousands of apps without giving you an easy option (if at all) to block posting usage patterns, such as "user X just played You Are Smarter Than A 5th Grader!" or similar crap.
If Apple is able to integrate it with an API that does not require people to show what they are doing, fine. But I just can't believe they are gonna be able to pull that off, since this constitutes FB's very reason to exist. Or as a developer friend of mine once said, "forced FB logins are great because they are easy to implement." Just like Windows in the good ol' monopoly days.
