Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
But only one camera: front facing.
iPad will never sport a back facing camera.
The idea of actually holding up an iPad to take pictures is laughable. Apple knows this. Many on these forums know this. So let's just file this "request" under "just because you can doesn't mean you should."

With a lone front facing camera, iPad could make a nice person to person video conferencig device. Considering the intimacy they're touting with iPad, person to person (even virtually) communication seems to fit the mold.

Agreed. It makes sense. However... currently I think the number of people who actually use video chat is probably very low and I'm not sure that will ever change. I bet if you did a survey asking how many people have ever used the webcam in their iMac/MacBook... the result would be less than 1%. It's one of those things that sounds really cool and everyone thinks they want... but they actually don't. Like voice recognition vs. keyboard input. Sounds cool in theory... but no one actually uses it or wants it. That's just a guess on my part though.
 
Why on earth didn't they just include the usb port and the SD slot in the ipad itself? unless the working support for all those other USB devices is unintended/unsupported, I have a hard time understanding why it isn't integrated. Maybe in iPad V2 I guess

It will not work for every device. if your device is not class compliant, chances are it will not work.
 
Think about it, if Apple had a front facing camera on an iPad it would also have to provide a great (iChat) application for its use. They did not want to provide that in an OS 3.x incarnation. This is to be a feature on the new iPhone in OS 4.x, the soonest we will see that is the end of June. The iPhone OS 4 for iPad will not be available until September. Accordingly, a camera on the current model creates more hassles than it is worth given the OS roll-out and iPhone 4G schedule. We will likely see an iPad with camera early 2011 and a likely camera accessory for Gen 1 iPads in the fall (2010).
 
It is my understanding that support to read any kind of USB drive (thumb or other) isn't in the OS.

Which I will go on record as saying is a mistake. I think that limited access would be highly useful. For backing up. If I'm traveling and I take my ipad with me and something happens I could lose a ton of stuff.

And I would be okay if that backup was some capsule form like when I use Time Machine or the typically annoying itunes backup mode. Just so long as I could plug in my restored ipad and get my stuff back. Say using a thumb drive.

I've even sent this feedback to Apple so perhaps in a future version of the OS.

If backup is your main reason for wanting USB read/write, doesn't iTunes backup iPad just like it does iPhone?
 
Nope. The truth is innovation continue and they save space, in taht space they can put more things, selling many iPad let them bring down the costs for next gen materials, so they can put more things without increasing price (for us and for them too).
Nobody is stopping you from buying a next gne when available and wait now. The adapter is cheap too and not all need to import photos on iPad so the better option is still to have it an external addon.

if the 2nd gen sells for the same price with more features isn't that just all the more incentive for people to buy it? apple is still making more money cause you are buying 2 instead of one.
 
Agreed. It makes sense. However... currently I think the number of people who actually use video chat is probably very low and I'm not sure that will ever change. I bet if you did a survey asking how many people have ever used the webcam in their iMac/MacBook... the result would be less than 1%. It's one of those things that sounds really cool and everyone thinks they want... but they actually don't. Like voice recognition vs. keyboard input. Sounds cool in theory... but no one actually uses it or wants it. That's just a guess on my part though.

I hear ya, Takeo.
There was also a time when more people listened to the radio than watched tv. ;)

One reason I suspect vid chatting hasn't taken off more than it has already, is perhaps users are/will be more interested in such on a more versatile/mobile device (iPad/iPhone) - as opposed to device (desk-/laptop) tethered to, at best, a hot spot.

Again, something as intimate as face to face conversation might be more desriable on a more intimate device than what has currently existed.

That said I can imagne a much better vid chatting experience on an iPad (practically a life sized image) than the smaller screen of an iPhone. Though I stand by the idea that both devices are perfectly suitable for such activity.
 
I don't have a problem with not integrating a USB port or an SD slot as long as they provide the same functionalities through wi-fi or bluetooth.

If they can just update iTunes so that it can work over Wi-Fi or bluetooth then I can live without them.

You can replace the SD functionality with a Shared Documents Folder that you can drag and drop through iTunes back and forth to your Mac.

iTunes Changes:
1. Have iTunes connect to your iPod, iPhone or iPad through Wi-Fi if present
2. If you hook up through the USB cable to charge, automatically enable tethering through iTunes software to enable networking with your operating system (NAT).

iPod, Iphone, and iPad changes in iTunes:
1. Create a new Documents folder under iTunes Library and the device so that you can drag and drop files that you want to share across all applications on your iPad, iPhone and iPod touch.
2. Make the Photos folder available under the device so that you can manually drag and drop pictures instead of being restricted to syncing. Create the same Photos folder under the Library for those that want to sync.
3. Make the Apps folder available under the device so that you can drag and drop applications instead of being restricted to syncing. Basically enable manual functionality for the apps folder just like the music folder.

This is my wish list for iTunes... If I can get this, then I have no need for an SD or USB port.

Refreshing. Software-based solutions.
Well played.
 
All of this is a moot point, when the ipad is jailbroken and they have direct access to the usb port through the camera connection kit, you will be able to use external drives as soon as someone writes an app to access it. Which is why I bought the 16gb ipad in the first place, people you have to think, if apple included a usb port that would accept external harddrives, why on earth would someone but the 32 or 64 gb versions?
 
As others have said, it looks easy. So it does what any Mac can do but requires a kludge adapter for which Apple can charge you.

No excuse for not having an SD card slot. Of course there are other memory card formats out there but that's no excuse for not having an SD card slot. SD cards are the dominant camera memory format at this time. And the life of this iPad 1.0 isn't going to be that long. Version 2 cannot be far behind. If there is a different dominant memory card format by version 2 (unlikely) then include that.

Nice interface though.

Well in your world, the SD card is the "dominant memory card format." In MY world (2 dSLR bodies & 1 point & shoot) the CF is king. The only thing I have that uses a SD card is my Wii. So I'm glad there is no SD slot on the iPad in MY world (I wish I could same the same about the MBP). Now they just need to sell the adaptors separately, and I'd be really happy in MY world.
 
Well in your world, the SD card is the "dominant memory card format." In MY world (2 dSLR bodies & 1 point & shoot) the CF is king.

The king is very, very old - and SDXC is the crown prince.

http://www.photographybay.com/2010/01/12/sdxc-cards-what-the-new-format-means-to-photographers/

The real advantage to the SDXC cards will most likely be seen by DSLR users first. As noted above, there are no current (12 Jan 2010) DSLR models that are SDXC-compliant. When DSLR manufacturers start using the SDXC spec, we may start to see SDXC challenge Compact Flash as a main stream DSLR storage solution.

SD cards already have a stronghold in the entry-level DSLRs, having completely pushed CF cards out of this category on most models (the Nikon D5000 and Canon Rebel T1i being the most prominent).

SD cards are also making their way into prosumer and pro DSLR models as secondary card slots as in the Nikon D300s and Canon 1D Mark IV. Some models like the Nikon D3s still use dual CF cards though.
 
Will a USB hub work?

Edit: Comment #8 on tuaw says a card reader plugged into a keyboard plugged into the iPad works, so I guess it will.
 
So I would have to buy an add on to use USB devices? carry it around with me, have it sticking out of the bottom and then most likely lose it? Question, why didn't they include a USB port and sd card slot? To make money selling these kits? Or just because they are idiots?

1. More cutouts in the case = less reliability due to rigidity, dust intrusion.
2. that cutout leads to something inside: that takes space; Less room for other stuff.
3. Even with a spring loaded or sliding cover, that's one more thing to break or be manufactured improperly = lower yield
4. Not everyone wants SD; I use SD, memory sticks (sony: both sizes), CF.
5. the apple connector is USB+ other stuff. The adapter makes perfect sense.

That said, yes, I'd like the USB port built in to V2 along with a reversable camera (pic and/or iChat). Also, the software to allow USB etc. flash memory cards to import / export files from an iPad file system. And the ability to play DVD / BluRay movies from an external self powered drive (I don't expect the iPad to power such devices).
 
God, so many trolls here that people that want information are ignored.

It works with RAW images in a limited way. The RAW file stays on your SD card, and the JPEG preview file is imported into the iPad. Thus you cannot off load your RAW files and reuse the SD card. Apple seems to feel that most people will use the Photo app as a way to display images, or to e-mail them. Since there is no App that can work with the RAW images on the iPad, we have to accept this limitation and keep our laptops for serious photo editing
Oh that's too bad. That video should be edited then. The person made it sound like it can import RAW files. Really, iPhoto seems like a natural app for the iPad. I wonder why we haven't seen iLife 2010 yet.
 
Given how prolific SD memory is, Apple really should put an SD slot near the dock connector.

Just my opinion. Two little slots (SD & dock connector) really wouldn't have destroyed the aesthetics of the device.
 
Well in your world, the SD card is the "dominant memory card format." In MY world (2 dSLR bodies & 1 point & shoot) the CF is king. The only thing I have that uses a SD card is my Wii. So I'm glad there is no SD slot on the iPad in MY world (I wish I could same the same about the MBP). Now they just need to sell the adaptors separately, and I'd be really happy in MY world.

It's not MY world either. I have a dSLR with a CF card too. But the iPad is supposedly marketed to grandparents and computer phobic people. I'd imagine that most of this demographic uses cameras that have SD memory cards.
 
Even before the iPad's release, so many people in the tech community have been hell-bent on dropping a deuce on it at every opportunity (mostly out of fear.) This trend has continued in spite of the public’s overwhelmingly positive response to the iPad. Which is no surprise. The more Joe Average, the media and the industry love it, the more the tech-heads on fansites will scream against it.

Rule of thumb: the more fan-site goers hate it, the better it is.

Keep up the hate, guys. You might just end up convincing me to get THREE of them, never mind just one.

Tell me more about how you see no use for the iPad, about how Apple should have included more holes in it to plug things into, and why you're not getting one and what your friends are saying about it! Tell me more!
 
God, so many trolls here that people that want information are ignored.


Oh that's too bad. That video should be edited then. The person made it sound like it can import RAW files. Really, iPhoto seems like a natural app for the iPad. I wonder why we haven't seen iLife 2010 yet.

Ok, there is someone on the apple discussion forums that claims that they were able to load RAW images to the iPad using the kit, then connected the iPad to the mac and were able to access the full resolution RAW files with Lightroom (with iPhoto and Aperture also recognizing the iPad). The resulting files were the full resolution and file size that were on the camera.

So maybe we need a little more clarification...
 
So late to this thread I doubt anyone will read this, but it seems odd to be that there are two primary assumptions on why there is no USB and no SD card on the iPad.

1. Apple is evil and wants you to suffer, or be forced to upgrade later.
2. Apple is a benevolent dictator who knows you don't actually want those and will soon see they are right.

If I may humbly suggest a third scenario. When they were lining up which features they wanted for the first release of the iPad and ranking them by importance and resources needed to develop, prototype, test and support. These features simply didn't make the cut line?

In my world there are lots of features and bug fixes that don't make it into releases that taken by themselves are "simple" because they don't rank high enough on the "things we have time to do" list.

Sometimes features are dropped because the first pass at implementing them created some unforeseen problem and there is only time to drop the feature and plan on doing it right next time around.

The platform they are leveraging for the iPad (iPhone iPod touch) does not have generic usb support or SD card support so it would have been more effort than simply soldering the connectors onto the board. They may simply have not had time.

just a thought,

*shrug*
 
It's too big to also be a camera so strike that. Now forward facing. Imagine it in your lap and you are looking straight down at the camera. You would look horrible. A double chin shot. It only works if the camera is up high and you are chin up. Who wants to hold a 1.5 pound device out in front of themselves to video conference? NOBODY. What percentage even do this on their laptop? Tiny. My guess is people who bitch about no camera don't even use the one they have, but just like to bitch.

Ok now Universal Serial Bus. Apple wouldn't want it to be universal so they left it off because people would rightly expect it to be like on their other computers. If it's to be safe and limited leave it off add an accessory for those who want it.
 
This was my thought at first, but why would Apple have a USB adapter? People are already testing USB headphones, keyboards, etc.

THe answer is money, two-fold.

1.) Apple will make money off adapter sales for the current iPad.
2.) And again when people upgrade to iPad v.2 when it includes a built in USB port, SD slot and for the LOVE OF G@D a CAMERA!!!!
Please check your facts, it's not a "USB adapter," it's a camera connection kit. If Apple had wanted it to be used with other devices they would have sold it as a USB adapter. I'd be willing to bet that we'll never see a built-in USB port on the iPad, we may never see an SD slot either. As for the camera, well, that's probably a given in another year or so.
 
chaosconan said:
I don't have a problem with not integrating a USB port or an SD slot as long as they provide the same functionalities through wi-fi or bluetooth.

If they can just update iTunes so that it can work over Wi-Fi or bluetooth then I can live without them.

You can replace the SD functionality with a Shared Documents Folder that you can drag and drop through iTunes back and forth to your Mac.

iTunes Changes:
1. Have iTunes connect to your iPod, iPhone or iPad through Wi-Fi if present
2. If you hook up through the USB cable to charge, automatically enable tethering through iTunes software to enable networking with your operating system (NAT).

iPod, Iphone, and iPad changes in iTunes:
1. Create a new Documents folder under iTunes Library and the device so that you can drag and drop files that you want to share across all applications on your iPad, iPhone and iPod touch.
2. Make the Photos folder available under the device so that you can manually drag and drop pictures instead of being restricted to syncing. Create the same Photos folder under the Library for those that want to sync.
3. Make the Apps folder available under the device so that you can drag and drop applications instead of being restricted to syncing. Basically enable manual functionality for the apps folder just like the music folder.

This is my wish list for iTunes... If I can get this, then I have no need for an SD or USB port.
Refreshing. Software-based solutions.
Well played.
You can already share files over WiFi between the iPad and Mac/PC using one of the third-party apps like AirSharing. No need for a USB port or a memory card slot. Of course, this type of file sharing is sandboxed so it isn't completely open to all potential functions but that's the way Apple probably wants it.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.