The issue isn't with Microsoft.. Windows 10 is actually pretty good. It has a tablet mode for tablet devices.
I completely disagree with this statement. 'Tablet Mode' in Windows 10 is a joke.
The issue isn't with Microsoft.. Windows 10 is actually pretty good. It has a tablet mode for tablet devices.
I completely disagree with this statement. 'Tablet Mode' in Windows 10 is a joke.
For those wanting a Surface, I recommend you wait until the next refresh with Skylake. I expect Microsoft to update in the Fall.
So, you disagree that Windows 10 is not good at all?
Obviously your entitled to your opinion, but I "think" Windows 10 has made great strides compared to Windows 8.
I'm on Windows 10 Preview and call it what you want, I think its pretty good. I'm rooting for Microsoft. A better Microsoft product in the end makes a better Apple product.
For those wanting a Surface, I recommend you wait until the next refresh with Skylake. I expect Microsoft to update in the Fall.
For every thread regarding the iPad Pro not being a "pro" device:
![]()
I feel that the people who complain have legitimate concerns and frustrations, but they are missing the forest for the trees.And sometimes i feel when people who put these images dont really understand why others are complaining...
Agreed that your workflow is inefficient. Starting with shooting raw, and then trying to use the iPad like a traditional workstation. I'm not at all surprised that you're frustrated.
Clearly the intended workflow is to import all your jpegs (either via camera connection kit or wi-fi), with iCloud Photos turned on. Then you simply pull them straight from iCloud to your mac, or use the share sheet to publish, email, or store in other cloud services.
I said 'jpegs' because editing 25MB raws is the very definition of a scientific/professional fringe use case, something a desktop os and laptop with legacy ports can handle with ease. And I don't see anything in Apple's iOS 10 preview website that even mentions raw. I would be very surprised if that's the direction they wanted to go in, because a) it's only a tiny fraction of all people taking photos, and b) people who shoot raw are either fussy OCD amateur hobbyists, or actual paid professionals... and Apple will NEVER satisfy either group with ANY iPad. It's a fool's errand.
With that argument, the iPad will never replace a desktop or laptop.
I agree 100%. If the new 9.7" model had just been called the Air 3 there would be far fewer complaints about it. People need to understand that "Pro" is just a marketing term. An iPad is still an iPad, for better or for worse.
You assume, wrongly, that "replace" means 1:1 function for function, workflow for workflow. The iPad already has replaced desktops and notepads for many people by being a new take on computing, with a new workflow paradigm. It shouldn't replicate legacy computing.
Either it replaces Macs or it doesn't.
It doesn't.
Either it replaces Macs or it doesn't.
It doesn't.
The fact that it is $100 more is neither here nor there, obviously.
.
It's all part of the marketing. "Pro" means people will feel that Apple is justified in charging more. Whether it actually does more is hardly important. Consumers are easy to manipulate with the right branding and buzz words.
If the better screen, camera, four speaker stereo sound, and Apple Pencil support aren't important to you, it's not worth the extra money. But it's a long way from being simply "marketing".
Every subsequent iPad/iPhone offers more and better features. They don't, however, typically go up in price $100 each year. But it's okay this time because it's a "Pro" device.
*Edit to add*
Don't get me wrong, if you like it and value those features you should definitely buy and enjoy. A good product is a good product. But let's be honest about the marketing games that Apple (and all other companies) play.
It's not so cut and dry. What if it does everything you used to do on your Mac, except for one or two things? So you used to spend hours in front of your Mac every day, but now you only use your Mac a few times a week.
then it means that it doesnt replace mac.
and the "it doesnt" is still valid.
That would mean that you'd solely use the Mac which you don't so "it doesn't" is not valid. That would be your own logic applied in opposite directionthen it means that it doesnt replace mac.
and the "it doesnt" is still valid.
The thing is, if I have a 5 year old Mac that I use every day, I'd be looking to buy a replacement soon. But a 5 year old Mac that I use only once a week -- I'm just going to keep using it. Paying for a new Mac that I know I won't use that often doesn't make sense.
So even if iPad isn't a total replacement for the Mac, it delays my purchase of a new Mac. Maybe by the time my Mac is ten years old, iPads really will be able to 100% replace Macs. Maybe a lot of us have already bought our last desktop/laptop computers, and we just don't know it yet.
That would mean that you'd solely use the Mac which you don't so "it doesn't" is not valid. That would be your own logic applied in opposite direction![]()
Yeah, i understand that you can do some of the same things with your ipad than you do with your mac, eg browsing and hence think about "replacing" mac when browsing...
it actually reduced functionality.