I always laugh at military grade protection. What does that mean? Which military? How did they obtain such technology? Does that mean the military doesn’t have the technology to have better protection than this small company can come up with?
Yeah, what's military grade? Some material that the military just happen to use? For what? Maybe at a push the military actually do have a spec for drop protection for mobile phones, but even then it's not going to be anything beyond what's already being widely sold on the market. If it was something like "survive a drop from 30,000ft onto concrete then be run over by a tank" and such a product existed, then it would seem unlikely that all these manufacturers were only bothering to sell cases to the public that can just about protect from a fall off a coffee table onto a wooden floor.
It's like the obsession with "aerospace grade materials". That could just mean something's made of the same stuff that the inflight catering food trays are made of.
Edit: from the Wiki article that someone else linked to on here:
Applicability to "ruggedized" consumer products[edit]
MIL-STD-810 is a flexible standard that allows users to tailor test methods to fit the application. As a result, a vendor's claims of "...compliance to MIL-STD-810..." can be misleading, because no commercial organization or agency certifies compliance, commercial vendors can create the test methods or approaches to fit their product. Suppliers can—and some do—take significant latitude with how they test their products, and how they report the test results. When queried, many[quantify] manufacturers will admit no testing has actually been done and that the product is only designed/engineered/built-to comply with the standard[citation needed]. This is because many of the tests described can be expensive to perform and usually require special facilities. Consumers who require rugged products should verify which test methods that compliance is claimed against and which parameter limits were selected for testing. Also, if some testing was actually done they would have to specify: (i) against which test methods of the standard the compliance is claimed; (ii) to which parameter limits the items were actually tested; and (iii) whether the testing was done internally or externally by an independent testing facility.[21]
It would be fun to call out some of the companies on here over that
Last edited: