Marketing: So, how many different cases are we making this year?
Tim Cook: Yes.
Tim Cook: Yes.
More money from customers' pockets to Apple'sI just hope they don’t hobble the smaller size with fewer features. I never understood the “bigger phone = more premium/professional” concept they’ve been playing up for years now.
Two use cases where I always wish my phone had a larger screen are not-optimised-for-mobile webpages and any kind of map reading. Editing actual documents are others but for these I accept that phone screens will likely always be annoyingly small.I get that point. I just don’t use my phone enough to make use of and be enthralled with edge to edge display, when I use my phone as a phone and not a computer.
Samsung having most of their user base on old versions of Android is called fragmentation. Screen sizes aren’t particularly relevant, are they?When Samsung had a bunch of different screen sizes it was call “fragmentation”.
Yeah, they should make Pro and non-Pro versions in at least four different sizes (4”, 4.7”, 5.4”, 6.1”, and 6.7”).The 6.1” size is the only size available in both non-Pro and pro. The 5.4” is only available in non-Pro and the 6.7” is only available in Pro.
If you want a 5.4” Pro or a 6.7” non-Pro you’re out of luck; like a 4” SE, Apple doesn’t think they’ll sell well enough to bother with.
So Apple’s customers want larger, higher end phones with more features, even if they’re more expensive?More money from customers' pockets to Apple's
A huge clue that iPhones should have a cursor is that there is an accessibility feature with one.My previous iPhone was an SE (the original SE) and then I moved on to an 8. It's a great piece of hardware but it's never quite felt right in my hand. I'm always juggling it a little or stretching or balancing it. I still have the old SE around as an extra device and every time I pick it up, it feels so much more natural in my hand.
One huge clue that iPhones have gotten too large for the upper part of the screen to be used one-handed: the "reachability" feature that slides the whole display down halfway.
That can be a factor but I think the main reason is that the majority of people prefer larger-screened phones.I’d argue that it’s not necessarily potential lack of demand, but what you can physically fit in the smaller chassis. At the very least it’s part of the equation. You can’t just take all the bells and whistles in a 6.7” model and magically fit them into a 5.4” model. These physical limitations have existed since the iPhone 6/Plus when the Plus had OIS and then the 7 Plus got the second rear camera. Perhaps the reason Apple is upping the smaller Pro to 6.1” is because that’s as small as they can make the chassis while still being able to fit everything they want to include in the high-end flagship phones. In any case, I’m happy that Apple is finally releasing a smaller phone that isn’t a low-end version with an older SoC, a la the 5C or SE.
That 5,4" is the real SE2.
[automerge]1594188606[/automerge]
imagine the difference in display size between 5 and that 5,4" 12. i think it will sell like crazy.
5exactly, what we need is an “edge to edge” phone in a modern iPhone 4/4s size
Why stop at 8 or 10 models?Yeah, they should make Pro and non-Pro versions in at least four different sizes (4”, 4.7”, 5.4”, 6.1”, and 6.7”).
Yeah. I am thinking that iPhone 12/12 Pro should have narrower width than iPhone 11.How would the 6.1 12 be the same size as the 11? The 11 already has bigger bezel than the pro’s because they are lcd. Not only is it supposed to be oled, but it’s supposed to have even thinner bezels than the current pro’s.
That can be a factor but I think the main reason is that the majority of people prefer larger-screened phones.
Not a fan of the new designs. The current 11 series is much better looking.
Apple completely understands the market and the only way you would see them engineer and build a premium small screened phone is if they were ignoring how the phone market works these days. I don’t doubt there is a small niche market for a fully featured expensive small screened phone, but it’s all about return on investment. Today‘s consumers expect a smaller phone to have a smaller price. A 5.4” phone priced about the same as a larger screened phone would do poorly in the market. Apple is forced to price a smaller phone less and loading it up with the best features at that lower price would negatively effect profitability on that model. Just because you and a handful of other people on this forum wants a phone like that doesn’t mean that’s how the general market works. Apple knows exactly what they are doing and that’s why the 5.4” will be a standard non-pro model. I’m sure it will still be a good phone and will have a price tag that better matches it‘s size and features.
That’s not quite the case though. In a vacuum, based on screen size alone they’d basically be equivalent in one-handed usability. Even though the 5.4” screen is a smidge smaller, it’s also taller because of the aspect ratio difference, making it essentially a wash. However the 5.4” screen is also missing approximately half an inch of bezel at the bottom, which in actuality significantly increases one-handed usability over the 5.5”. Based on the pics, I’d expect one-handed usability to be roughly equivalent to the 4.7” phones. Not perfect, but still acceptable.
I hear that some are more interested in girthAll the phones are obscuring each others width... is it height only that's important?