Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It's not "enhanced," it's basically the same A15 on the 13 Pros. The only enhancement is the modem, but Apple uses external modem from Qualcomm, not built into the A15.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sorgo †
It's not "enhanced," it's basically the same A15 on the 13 Pros. The only enhancement is the modem, but Apple uses external modem from Qualcomm, not built into the A15.
You've seen the specs or internal documents and know this for a fact?
 
I don't see why phones have to be released every 12 months at this point. They're pretty mature now and the differences year to year are often small. A longer life cycle would be doable, similar to Macs and the iPad Pro.
That argument is only valid if 100% of iphone users are using iphone 12 or newer. Reality is not the case. Plenty of people on iphone 11, XR, 8, 7, or even older. There will always be people looking to upgrade their phone at any given time.

Chinese Android OEMs are releasing new models on their mid to low end every 6 months. The market is huge, and there will always be people looking to buy a new smartphone.
 
Uh, no.

Somebody already mentioned they are likely getting more RAM. 6 GB in the iPhone 14, vs. 4 GB in the iPhone 13.

Plus the rumour is there will be no mini this year. There will be a 6.7" Plus, so no, not the same display.

Because of the Plus, there will be a different battery. I betcha the iPhone 14 Plus will have significantly improved battery life over the iPhone 13.

And the rumour is the iPhone 14 is getting a new front facing camera.

To put it another way, this is a HUGE upgrade for the non-Pro series. Biggest in years in fact. I wouldn't be surprised if the iPhone 14 Plus is the number one top seller in Q1 2023. (Not necessarily Q4 2022 though, because the Pro series may have a 1 month head start.)
So let's see. Same chip, same RAM and (rumoured) same rear cameras (minus telephoto) as 13 Pro & 13PM. The 14 will have the same display as 13, and I'm guessing the Plus will have the same 6.7" OLED non-LTPO panel as 12PM. They're pretty much reusing almost all of the components, but sure let's call it a huge upgrade.
 
If you doing heavy graphic things then you may notice a difference. As phones age you notice the difference. Also the extra GPU increases the benchmark by more than 2%.
I think the more important factor is the 6GB of RAM, vs 4GB on the regular 13's A15. Apple has used RAM as a cutoff of iOS upgrades (iphone 6 vs 6s). There will be time when 6GB of RAM will be the minimum, I'd say.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mabhatter
With an exchanced chip, This is the iPhone 13S version. I wonder if Apple will allow the launch of these iPhones with the Pro line up or it will it be separate?

It also sounds like this is going from S6 > S7 Apple Watch. Just under the hood refinement a little.
In my memory, the "S" versions historically had brand new chips with much higher performance gains. The iPhone 4 had essentially the same line of Samsung CPU and PowerVR GPU as the 3GS, but put everything on the same "package" and increased the clock speed. The 4S had a whole different class of chips with the A5.
Same big jumps between 5 and 5S (64-bit...) and between iPhone 6 and 6S (2GB RAM, mush faster A9 processor).
If the iPhone 14 get an "upgraded" version of the 13, it won't be as good a gain as for an "S" year.
It won't even be as good as an "R" year (well, there was only one and it was essentially an "S" year).
 
So let's see. Same chip, same RAM and (rumoured) same rear cameras (minus telephoto) as 13 Pro & 13PM. The 14 will have the same display as 13, and I'm guessing the Plus will have the same 6.7" OLED non-LTPO panel as 12PM. They're pretty much reusing almost all of the components, but sure let's call it a huge upgrade.
Indeed. That’s just it. Huge upgrade because you’re getting essentially a Pro Max level device for non-Pro pricing. This is huge for the non-Pro line. Biggest non-Pro upgrade in years.
 
Indeed. That’s just it. Huge upgrade because you’re getting essentially a Pro Max level device for non-Pro pricing. This is huge for the non-Pro line. Biggest non-Pro upgrade in years.
Yes, but people looking to complain will always find something to complain about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EugW
So it seems like the best bargain will be to buy old stock of last year’s 13 Pro. Not sure how they’ll sell it to the public that it’s the same phone but has “more cores”, when the 13 pro will be the same hardware, but with an extra camera, for about the same price…
Brand new 13 Pros will probably still be more expensive than regular 14, although it might be a good value for the rest of the Pro features. But with the way Apple controlled its inventories, finding specific model with the color and storage option you want might be challenging.

With the impending keynote of the 14, even in my country, I'm seeing the authorized resellers thinning out their inventory. And it's not like we will be getting the new phones ASAP, we will probably only get them in December or so. But I can already see Apple tightening the inventories so demand will be at the highest peak upon release date.
 
In my memory, the "S" versions historically had brand new chips with much higher performance gains. The iPhone 4 had essentially the same line of Samsung CPU and PowerVR GPU as the 3GS, but put everything on the same "package" and increased the clock speed. The 4S had a whole different class of chips with the A5.
Same big jumps between 5 and 5S (64-bit...) and between iPhone 6 and 6S (2GB RAM, mush faster A9 processor).
If the iPhone 14 get an "upgraded" version of the 13, it won't be as good a gain as for an "S" year.
It won't even be as good as an "R" year (well, there was only one and it was essentially an "S" year).
The regular iphone 14 is essentially an iphone 13.1 (like you said, it's not even worth the S badge}.
 
Currently using the 11 Pro and I am just not seeing the upgrade for me.

Undoubtedly if you sat them side by side, the 14 would be quicker and have a nicer screen but really, once the new phone hype has worn off in a month or so, everything will just be the same. Apps will load the same, the photos will look the same on the iphone screen which is where most people view them anyway and realistically, I am still going to need to charge it every night as the bigger battery is still not going to last me 2 full days.
The 11 Pro seems like one of the finest iphone Apple ever made, highly refined version of the X/Xs design.
 
“Enhanced version” - a term invented by the Wall Street crowd thats been planted in Apple’s executive suites and then given to their Marketing/PR firms to recite over and over to mask the fact they have made little if any changes other than cosmetic, and an increase in pricing.

in short - nothing more than a marketing gimmick.
 
The rumours of the 14 model remind me of this…

577F02D7-280F-4A20-8D2E-A343CBE3FD2E.jpeg
 
This A15 “enhanced version” is probably an identical A15 with software update to boost its performance.
Better power management, 1x extra GPU core from 13 Pro and maybe higher clock speed with 6GB RAM.

with software update you mean only the clock speed increase which the rumours clearly show it's not only limited to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: snipr125
These are upgrades for people with iPhones from 4-5 years ago.
Sure, but there are plenty of others that upgrade or feel the need to upgrade much more frequently than that.

That argument is only valid if 100% of iphone users are using iphone 12 or newer. Reality is not the case. Plenty of people on iphone 11, XR, 8, 7, or even older. There will always be people looking to upgrade their phone at any given time.

Chinese Android OEMs are releasing new models on their mid to low end every 6 months. The market is huge, and there will always be people looking to buy a new smartphone.
I don't think a less rigid update schedule has to have that much impact. Apple already sells 2-3 year old+ phones on their store. Plus it sounds like you're making the opposite point, the devices are good for years and don't need to be updated so often. It just seems a bit wasteful. More time to work on software without constant annual pressure could be good too.

Of course, realistically nothing's changing anytime soon, so it is what it is I suppose.
 
I don't think a less rigid update schedule has to have that much impact. Apple already sells 2-3 year old+ phones on their store. Plus it sounds like you're making the opposite point, the devices are good for years and don't need to be updated so often. It just seems a bit wasteful. More time to work on software without constant annual pressure could be good too.

Of course, realistically nothing's changing anytime soon, so it is what it is I suppose.
my point was at any given time, there are people who are looking for an upgrade, and thus having a yearly new releases still makes sense. :)
 
What I'm seeing, compared to what I own currently (iPhone 12) is likely going to prompt me to get an iPhone 14 Pro. The *only* reason I hesitate is the supposed switch to USB C next year...but considering the rest of the family has devices that use the Lightning port, and the fact that I'm not any sort of amateur photographer, I don't see any real benefit to needing to wait for the USB-C ready iPhone.

With that said, if I'm mistaken on this, let me know; I'd also have no issue getting an iPhone 14 and waiting a year if there ARE benefits beyond what I've listed.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.