Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
- Instead of unions, people should be more fluid in quitting their jobs, letting the free market work.
I'm not entirely sure about your first point; I somewhat agree and somewhat disagree, but I don't find that question interesting. Let's continue the discussion of that subject after the inevitable fall of neo-liberal capitalism.

- Right to repair? I let Apple repair. I don't have time to heat up the panel to open up the iPhone. Instead, I tap a button, - Apple sends me a new iPhone, I send in the old one, job done. Apple takes care of recycling my iPhone. Less time wasted for me.
The right to repair does not prevent Apple from performing "repairs" (actually just swapping parts); it simply opens up a free market around that process. Or is a free market only considered good when it benefits late-stage capitalism? :D
Case 1: Let's say you own a top-tier MacBook Pro with M1 Max, 64GB RAM, and 8TB storage, and the motherboard dies. Apple will ask you for a very hefty sum for replacement, because it's an expensive board. Third-party repair services will fix the board itself for a steady price that depends only on the damage done.
Case 2: Same scenario, but you have important data on that MacBook. Apple won't recover your data. Third-parties will.
Case 3: You have an iPhone XS, and you broke the screen. Apple will charge you around $400 for that repair, which is more than the price of simply buying another used iPhone XS.
Case 4: If you don't live near an Apple Store but need repairs done fast, you could simply go to a third-party service located in your area.
More flexibility is always better than less flexibility.

- Sideloading means Microsoft/Adobe/Activision/etc... are eventually going to leave the app store and force users to install their stores to continue using apps I've already paid for. Multiple stores running in background to autoupdate apps and run push notification services means it'll kill my battery.
Publishers have not left Google Play, which has the same draconian fees; why would they leave the App Store? Sideloading means you will have the option to install directly/pay directly, usually in addition to the option of just using the App Store.
Also sideloading means improved security, because instead of relying on App Store Review team to scan all the apps for compliance, Apple will be forced to actually start developing good software, which properly sandboxes third-party applications, monitors their behaviour, etc.
MacBooks can run any third-party software in the world and they have industry-leading battery life, btw.

- USB-C is actually worse for the planet assuming Apple was going to go portless in the next few years. But because they were forced to switch, it's more than likely they'll delay going portless, requiring billions of extra USB-C cables to be produced before going portless. The plan of removing charging cable from the box has been delayed by several years and average number of cables a human buys in this generation goes up because of USB-C.
1. But they still ship cables. Instead of shipping cables that only work with iPhone, they will now ship cables that work with any devices of yours. Great news!
2. iPhone will not go portless in foreseeable future; ask any videographer why. And now the iPhone won't be capped by USB 2.0 Lightning speeds when transferring files. Again, great news.
3. Having full-blown USB-C port also opens up potential for something like Samsung DeX mode. Which won't happen, of course, but only because Apple hates their customers.
4. Also USB Audio on an iPhone, finally. It's not as good as having headphone jack, of course, but it's better than nothing.

Sorry, but none of these things are good.
For their profit margins — sure.
 
On paper 15P doesn't switch and 15PM is just $100+. Both phones are starting from 256GB and not 128GB.
X70 modem vs. X65 modem -- a substantial upgrade.
Just like X65 was from X60 aka not big one in reality. And transition from X60 to X65 on paper was much bigger, than X65 to X70. X65 introduced new node, etcs..

Edit: See here.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Premium1 and klasma
so you want apple to be prounions.
you want right to repair.
you want usb-c which means apple must keep including the charging cable for the next 5 years.
you want apple to allow sideloading.
you want Apple to get sued for XYZ.

gee i wonder why they increased prices.

next time you complain about something related to Apple products, just remember that the costs almost always get passed onto you, the consumer.
but definitely not always. For example, higher capacity SSD upgrades in Macs. I do complain about that, indeed.
 
Cool. I like having the best.

Paying for it is a feature, not a bug.

And it insures I'll be able to get the one when I want when I want it.
 
Since it looks like yet another iteration of “slightly faster and slightly better camera compared to last year” I don’t see how they can rationalise it becoming more expensive.
Maybe they will say USBC costs so much to implement. Haha.

Actually, you have a point and probably why next year or the following when the eliminate the bezels and go under screen with FaceID they could push the price up along with the storage.
 
People are obviously willing to pay for it so Apple is going to do it. What else are you going to do? It’s not like people are going to change platforms, that would be inconvenient.
 
Oof. I can swallow a $100 price increase given it’s been the same price for 5 years now, but $150 or $200 seems like a big jump, especially for what seems to be only minimal differences compared to the 14 Pro Max.
 
I don't believe this, unless Apple really wants to downsell the regular iPhone 15 and 15 Plus.
 
Well, since upgrading iPhones become less and less necessary over longer spans of time, and Apple seem to want to raise the price all the time, I’ll wait until the iPhone 16 or 17, then get a 15 Pro for cheaper. lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: klasma
What's funny (?) to me is that I'll upgrade my phone to the tune of $1K without really thinking about it too much, but when it comes to my MacBook, I am WAY more miserly for some reason.
That’s because for the longest time it was the thing to do, get a new phone every year. Only in the last 4 or so years when the market started to penetrate has the really changed.
And for laptops, corp used to be 4 year depreciation and getting a new one every year for personal use has never been a thing
 
Unfortunately, many people outside the USA have to pay a ridiculous 20% VAT with each iPhone purchase and not every company offers monthly plans.
not only for iPhones, just to clarify…
And those people continue to vote for those politicians who continue to raise taxes, not only VAT…
 
  • Like
Reactions: BugeyeSTI
My carrier will offer me $800 for my 2 year old phone and break up the remainder on bills for the next 2 years. I won’t notice and neither will most people
 
With the minor updates since iphone x , i have decided to hang onto to iphone much longer than my 2 year upgrade cycle previously.

I cannot justify buying a iphone that looks like my iphone 12 pro max, with little updates under the hood.

For me its best i waste my money on the iphone 16 ultra! or 17 ultra!
And really, is your iphone at all slow or the pictures not fantastic?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.