Unless you can boot up MacOS, I am ok with USB C with 6 GB. I should be enough for making phone calls and stuff.
This is cool and all from a bragging standpoint, and I get it. You don't want to stay idle, but I think we've long since reached the point of diminishing returns. I'm on a 13 and probably would have still been good to go on my XS.
Apple is foremost a design company and is not known for bending to every user’s whim like yours. They’re known for being really late to the party but when they do they get it right while other companies focus on getting features out first.Good god. How do you reach that far for excuses without your arm detaching into orbit?
The Galaxy Note 2 (2012) had a 5.5” 720p screen, which was enormous and laughable at the time, and now Apple and other companies don’t even make a modern phone that small. The Note 2 (and smaller phones) supported split-screen.
Nobody is being forced to use it. If the text is too small, users can zoom or increase the size!
I don’t see why this is such a complicated issue and why people feel the need to fiercely justify the omission of a basic feature that every other phone has had for years.
3.7GHz in your pocket is amazing to me. For college, I remember my 40lbs tower from "Gateway" 😂 had a 1.0Ghz Intel Core Duo. Probably required the power of small city to run.
My first PC was a Pentium 4 with Hyper Threading (yeah, the first CPU with that technology). One single core @ 3GHz. One Gigabyte of RAM. And a big, chunky hard drive of around 60GB.I can still hear the rumbling sounds from my first 20MB HDD spinning up and writing data, or the dreaded bzzzbzzz bzzbzz bzzzbzzz bzzbzz sound the floppy drive would emit just before declaring a CRC error.
I use split screen multitasking all the time on my iPad Air v4, works wonders for me… 👍🏻Split-screen multitasking may not look cool in iOS tho. I think Apple needs to increase the size of the screen. (Not just make it taller but wider too) to take full advantage of the split-screen. Maybe iPhone Ultra will offer that?
![]()
Ram is so cheap today, it’s amazing they don’t just give you 16gb. Literally the cost of the physical chip at volume is like $2.
Before you say oh but $2 x a million phones is a lot of money for Apple. I’d be more than willing to pay $1201, instead of $1199 if that’s what it takes 😆
EXACTLY!I'm really tired of apps getting kicked out of memory every time I open the camera app. This is probably the biggest reason to increase RAM. Apple needs to stop cheaping out in the name of higher profits - they already have the highest margins in the industry by far, with plenty of room for additional RAM while still leading the industry in profit. But they won't.
We have here someone who does not understand Tesla's ultimate FSD future.Tesla is ripping out a cheap plastic stalk on a $40k+ car. Every time you want to go into forward / reverse you have to reach for the touch screen. They also ripped out a cheap thermometer and replaced it with local weather from the web. Frugality has no limits.
EXACTLY!
I think all those Apple apologists never use the "most advanced, most sophisticated" iPhone camera ever. 🙄️
Well everyone is already wondering why a base Macbook has only 8GB RAM and 256GB SSD in 2023.If they do eight then people will cry why does an iPhone have as much RAM as a base Macbook
Yea I don’t see what’s “professional” about a tool that is completely dysfunctional in the areas of multitasking. I mean so much of what we do centers around using various apps and rapidly switching over to the camera to take pics and then getting back to what we were previously doing. Having safari tabs constantly reload, my apps constantly reloading because I *took a pic* is pretty ridiculous.
It’s 2023 and people will be using 15 pro’s well into 24/25/26/27, and Apple may cripple them from day 1. With all the issues the iPhone 14 pro’s have had, the 15’s would be even worse with software bloat, along with whatever hardware updates that may be more ram intensive.
Only really ignorant folks wonder why a base Macbook has only 8GB RAM and 256GB SSD in 2023. Anyone with sense realizes that there are some users (granny's email, K-12 administrators with scores of tightly managed boxes running one-app-at-a-time) who want/need lowest possible price and will do fine with 8 GB.Well everyone is already wondering why a base Macbook has only 8GB RAM and 256GB SSD in 2023.
The answer is, of course, so that Apple can ream customers with their massive 400% Markup Apple Upgrade Tax on RAM/SSD upgrades.
Only really ignorant folks wonder why a base Macbook has only 8GB RAM and 256GB SSD in 2023. Anyone with sense realizes that there are some users (granny's email, K-12 administrators with scores of tightly managed boxes running one-app-at-a-time) who want/need lowest possible price and will do fine with 8 GB.
Folks whining about base RAM IMO just want more for less money, which is boring.
What is important is how much RAM is available. And given that I just put 96 GB in a Macbook Pro, Apple is doing great in that regard - at least until we get to Mac Pros. That said, I add my voice to those asking for more RAM in iPhone Pro models, even though I currently feel no RAM limitations using my iPhone 14 Pro (thousands of RAW captures).
Not to mention annoying for Apple shareholders.Folks whining about base RAM IMO just want more for less money, which is boring.
True.Only really ignorant folks wonder why a base Macbook has only 8GB RAM and 256GB SSD in 2023.