I'm totally not surprised that Apple is going this route! I don't think the EU will happy by this decision at all though.
Not sure the EU will care as long as Apple meets their legal obligations?I'm totally not surprised that Apple is going this route! I don't think the EU will happy by this decision at all though.
You don’t understand what USB-C compatibility means. A cable with a USB-C connector with USB 2.0 speeds *is* within spec.Wonderful idea ! USB-B shaped connector that is not USB-C, since it does not have regular USB-C compatibility.
I would almost laugh if the EU rules this does not count as USB-C support since you cannot use your existing USB-C charger and expect it to work unless it is "Apple certified".
I think you’re correct. I think the EU did not mandate minimum charging or data transfer speeds.Not sure the EU will care as long as Apple meets their legal obligations?
They did mandate minimum charging standard. It’s known as USB Power delivery 3.0 as mandatory supported standard alongside whatever proprietary standards the manufacturer have.I think you’re correct. I think the EU did not mandate minimum charging or data transfer speeds.
Unlikely this rumor have any truth to it anyway. All apple iPhones use USB PD as the fast charging method or their fast charging power bricks.Yep, you are getting exactly what you asked for USB-C Apples' way.
No.
It's made things significantly easier; my phone, work laptop, chargers, headphones, battery banks, parents phones, external hard drives, mouse, keyboard even my lint roller and electric shaver all use USB-C male to male.
On the other hand, Apple sells a phone and laptop but the two Apple products can't connect without a stupid dongle. Makes sense.
This doesn't pass the smell test. I've never heard of this happening.
Interesting. So.... why hasn't Apple gone down this route on their $5,000 laptops?
I don't like calling for people to lose their jobs, but the people who decided this was a good idea should not be employed by Apple.
Blame the EU, they are the ones forcing apple to change to USBC and causing that waste.Apple is so pro environment, throw out all of your perfectly good cables cause we didn’t make any profit off them
I was going to say... uh... first off, we don't even know exactly what's going to happen. Two, everything I've read already invalidated a lot of the outrage in this thread.
I think Apple did this when they released the 2016 MacBook Pros as USB-C only.i mean this is what you get for accelerating usb-c adoption faster than what Apple intended
so not only are people going to throw out lightning faster, people are going to buy more usb-c cables than they would have, creating an environmental disaster
great job EU. you just screwed over the world once again
"or you know, Apple could just not do MFi program"
or you know, EU could just stop overstepping their role
I think you’re correct. I think the EU did not mandate minimum charging or data transfer speeds.
or you know, EU could just stop overstepping their role
Not quite... two - a lot of the outrage about charging slow is invalidated because the EU mandates PD and iPhone already supports PD.So one we don't know what will happen, but two you guys are all wrong because I know exactly what will happen?
Not quite... two - a lot of the outrage about charging slow is invalidated because the EU mandates PD and iPhone already supports PD.
Based on iPads & iPhones supporting PD and MacBooks supporting PD and the EU requiring it, logically it's probably safe to assume iPhones will continue to support PD on USB C.
That's what my two was focused at.
Who knows about data transfer speeds. Those on iPhone have always been really poor.
It takes about 10 seconds to copy a 1GB file over AirDrop. A wired connection, at iPhone USB speeds, is about 40 seconds. iPhones don't do 40gbps.Wired will always be faster than wireless.
Wtf are u saying. Wired transfer is up to 40gbps on Apple's devices. AirDrop is piss slow for large files in comparison. There is a reason why Apple includes Thunderbolt on iPad Pros and Macs.