Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Wonderful idea ! USB-B shaped connector that is not USB-C, since it does not have regular USB-C compatibility.

I would almost laugh if the EU rules this does not count as USB-C support since you cannot use your existing USB-C charger and expect it to work unless it is "Apple certified".
You don’t understand what USB-C compatibility means. A cable with a USB-C connector with USB 2.0 speeds *is* within spec.
 
  • Like
Reactions: strongy and jlc1978
I think you’re correct. I think the EU did not mandate minimum charging or data transfer speeds.
They did mandate minimum charging standard. It’s known as USB Power delivery 3.0 as mandatory supported standard alongside whatever proprietary standards the manufacturer have.

Example Samsung having their special standard that works with their cables or charging bricks, and if you use anything else that doesn’t support it will then fallback on USB PD 3.0
 
I don’t care because the way I see it paying the certification means the cable likely isn’t junk. Almost every non-certified (or whatever it’s called) cable for iPhone I’ve bought has been trash. This seems to at least force some sort of accountability. I doubt it’s perfect but at least it weeds out the serious companies from the cheap crap being imported from junk factories.

Also the EU can blow it out their ports. Them telling companies what ports to use is nuts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: strongy
Yep, you are getting exactly what you asked for USB-C Apples' way.
Unlikely this rumor have any truth to it anyway. All apple iPhones use USB PD as the fast charging method or their fast charging power bricks.
AB080051-0BB9-438B-B098-6510373A856D.png

E34B5E24-F530-41DF-97E5-BA6BC31A927C.jpeg
 
i prefer the MFi certification but apple really needs to up the quality of there first party devices and accessories.

for example, things like airpods pros and apple usb-c cables are equally bad in quality and even sometimes worse than 3rd party ones.
 
Could go either way, iPads already support faster charging through USB-C cables including non-MFI cables.

However, iPhone do limit wireless charging to 7.5W for non-magsafe induction chargers.
 
No.

It's made things significantly easier; my phone, work laptop, chargers, headphones, battery banks, parents phones, external hard drives, mouse, keyboard even my lint roller and electric shaver all use USB-C male to male.

On the other hand, Apple sells a phone and laptop but the two Apple products can't connect without a stupid dongle. Makes sense.


This doesn't pass the smell test. I've never heard of this happening.



Interesting. So.... why hasn't Apple gone down this route on their $5,000 laptops?

Smell test... okay I had it happen personally to a Switch. Had two coworkers fry Samsung phones. One fried two of his kids Chromebooks.

https://www.theverge.com/2016/2/3/10905432/usb-c-cable-fries-google-engineers-computer

There is a heavily documented article about the Google engineer that proves cables/adapters can fry devices from 2015 onward.

It's now turned into a whole website tracking cables:


Just google fried USB C and Macbook and you see looks like Macbooks like to do the frying (they damage the plugged in device).

I do always enjoy the never happened to me crowd. It keeps the status quo. You're holding the phone/charger/cable wrong right?

I stick to what I said. Type-C is a "standard" that carries friable amounts of power and assumes everything is talking the same spec. It's never 100% the case. Some devices handle this better than others. I have no issue with additional safeguards and I hope they do add it across the board.
 
I don't like calling for people to lose their jobs, but the people who decided this was a good idea should not be employed by Apple.

Whoever made this decision has “chief officer” in their job title and isn’t going anywhere.
 
I was going to say... uh... first off, we don't even know exactly what's going to happen. Two, everything I've read already invalidated a lot of the outrage in this thread.

So one we don't know what will happen, but two you guys are all wrong because I know exactly what will happen?
 
i mean this is what you get for accelerating usb-c adoption faster than what Apple intended

so not only are people going to throw out lightning faster, people are going to buy more usb-c cables than they would have, creating an environmental disaster

great job EU. you just screwed over the world once again

"or you know, Apple could just not do MFi program"

or you know, EU could just stop overstepping their role
I think Apple did this when they released the 2016 MacBook Pros as USB-C only.
 
or you know, EU could just stop overstepping their role

Well the last time I checked it was the EUs role to regulate products sold within the EU single market. I'm pretty sure neither Apple nor random MacRumors users get to define what the EU's remit is in this regard or when it has overstepped it.

I would assume if Apple had serious concerns with this and its legal department saw a genuine case they would play hardball and try to escalate this to the Court of Justice of the EU.
 
So one we don't know what will happen, but two you guys are all wrong because I know exactly what will happen?
Not quite... two - a lot of the outrage about charging slow is invalidated because the EU mandates PD and iPhone already supports PD.

Based on iPads & iPhones supporting PD and MacBooks supporting PD and the EU requiring it, logically it's probably safe to assume iPhones will continue to support PD on USB C.

That's what my two was focused at.

Who knows about data transfer speeds. Those on iPhone have always been really poor.
 
I can't quite believe this rumor yet. I already have two original USB-C Apple cables and two more from other vendors. They all work perfectly fine charging my iPad and also my MacBook (up to 30 Watts). This would mean I'd have to replace all the cables?
 
  • Like
Reactions: maxoakland
I knew Apple would do this. It's all about the money. There is a significant amount money in MFi certified program, it is highly profitable. It's a business in itself.
 
Last edited:
Not quite... two - a lot of the outrage about charging slow is invalidated because the EU mandates PD and iPhone already supports PD.

Based on iPads & iPhones supporting PD and MacBooks supporting PD and the EU requiring it, logically it's probably safe to assume iPhones will continue to support PD on USB C.

That's what my two was focused at.

Who knows about data transfer speeds. Those on iPhone have always been really poor.

That is a reasonable argument and I agree let's wait and see, but it still doesn't "invalidate" anything if your very first argument is that we don't know what will happen. Those two just don't go together.
 
Wired will always be faster than wireless.

Wtf are u saying. Wired transfer is up to 40gbps on Apple's devices. AirDrop is piss slow for large files in comparison. There is a reason why Apple includes Thunderbolt on iPad Pros and Macs.
It takes about 10 seconds to copy a 1GB file over AirDrop. A wired connection, at iPhone USB speeds, is about 40 seconds. iPhones don't do 40gbps.

(I just tested to get those numbers)

Plus also takes like a minute for my iPhone to load in Finder after I connect the cable and click on it. And you can't copy from a Mac to or from the Files app on an iPhone. You need to copy via a third party app that allows access to files over USB. Which means you need to launch that app app on your phone to and copy the file to the Files app.

AirDrop is absolutely faster than a cable right now. it shouldn't be, but it is. Unfortunately, AirDrop doesn't always work. Sigh.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: strongy
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.