Yep, but this is only possible if you are willing to be an at&t customer which a lot of dont or cant. Thats why I bought my touch in the first place.
I'm a T-Mobile one...
Yep, but this is only possible if you are willing to be an at&t customer which a lot of dont or cant. Thats why I bought my touch in the first place.
I think to stay competitive with the iphone (to what degree the Touch needs to be competitive with the iphone is clearly debatable), the Touch will need some hardware upgrade or storage upgrade in September +. Considering the student promotion, I wouldn't look for a change in it anytime soon. Unless the entire lineup of iPod prices is going to change (unlikely), we should look for new features/more storage rather than a change in price. Bluetooth for instance (crossed fingers).
Im mainly getting the touch because I like my cell and didn't want to switch over to AT&T for the iphone and the touch is cheaper then the Iphone. Are you guys even adding in the money you'll be paying over the 2yr contracts?![]()
I put up my 8gig touch with extras for sale on craigslist, asking price- 240. this moron kept on emailing me about how you can get the same capacity iPhone brand new for $200, and that my price made no sense. the touch is not the iPhone, I told him. these are 2 different products. I told him compare the touch to the touch which cost about $327 with tax.
That is the problem with Apple's decision to offer a subsidy. There are too many morons (read majority) that won't see the real cost, but just the price they have to pay. People will always see $199 (with contract or not) and ask why they should pay more for less when considering the touch.
I think Apple may have to bend to the will of the consumer on this one by lowering the price and/or adding features to the touch. Either that or perhaps they'll be happy with everyone buying an iphone instead of a touch. I guess it could be win/win for them either way.
The only way your comparison makes sense is for people that don't have or want a cell phone (getting the Touch is a no brainer) or have a cell phone and won't replace their cell service with the iPhone but will just add another service plan (Touch is also a no brainer).
For people that would be switching services or renewing a contract they already have, you can't count the iPhone's entire monthly service contract because they would be paying for some sort of cell phone service whether or not they got the iPhone. The only part of the monthly service contract you can tack on to the "price" you give for the iPhone is that which the customer would not have paid had he not gotten the iPhone and stuck with some other plan and the Touch instead.
Maybe you're assuming that most people are in the first boat, but as far as I know, people with enough money to be in the market for iPods and iPhones have cell phone plans...
I think even most morons will realize that the iPhone is the gift that keeps on taking, whereas the iPod touch is a one-time cost. It's pretty simple and, frankly, a little shocking that the conversation has lasted this long.
listen, one is a CELL PHONE the other is an IPOD, they are DIFFERENT products with DIFFERENT costs of ownership. are you really desperate enough to try and argue they're the same thing?
A capacity shift among price points is probably the most that you're gonna get unless the entire iPod line undergoes price reconstructing.Im gonna buy a 32gb touch. The price of the touch has to drop. it will
i'm from the UK and the provider of the iphone here- O2 -are offering it on " pay as you go " which means that for 99 pounds you get an iphone not the 2200 that someone posted.This will make the touch redundant unless a similar/better price drop which seems unlikely as the whole ipod price structure would need to change -- very strange.
Dude you're dreaming. There is no way you are getting an iPhone for 99 pounds without signing a contract. O2 (and Apple) would lose truckloads cash on every phone they sold. As an educated guess from the Italian PAYG prices you'll be paying at least 3 times that to walk out of the store not on a contract.i'm from the UK and the provider of the iphone here- O2 -are offering it on " pay as you go " which means that for 99 pounds you get an iphone not the 2200 that someone posted.This will make the touch redundant unless a similar/better price drop which seems unlikely as the whole ipod price structure would need to change -- very strange.
That's not PAYG pricing. That's the price on the different tariffs.Yes they have
iPhone is now free on selected Pay Monthly tariffs*
There's only one thing better than an iPhone. The new iPhone 3G.
*Best of all, the new 8GB iPhone won't cost you a penny on our £45 and £75 tariffs. And it's just £99 on our £35 tariff and new £30 tariff.
Bingo. And it will cost a lot more than an equivalent iPod touch.However they do not mention price for pasyg suggesting it will be more expensive.
You can't seriously be that naive. Can you?i'm from the UK and the provider of the iphone here- O2 -are offering it on " pay as you go " which means that for 99 pounds you get an iphone...
99 ponds on a 30 pound tarriff is still pretty good if you need a tariff for a phone anyway.
As long as this info is still current and assuming you're in the states, it looks like (last 2 paragraphs) you'll be able to buy the phone on contract and then cancel it after 1 month with a termination fee of ~$200. So overall you'll have the price of the phone ($299) + 1 months contract tariff + ~$200 cancellation fee for your phone. You should be able to use it with any plan you like from there.so.. Am I to assume you cannot by any means get an iphone w/o a contract. I was considering this as well because I wouldnt mind having an a 16g iphone w/o a DATA plan. Granted, this certainly negates quiet a bit of the iphone functionality, but come on... its cheaper than the touch and it has a ton more functionality.
I understand the subsodies and the contracts make up the diff, but still from a pure marketing stand point is it feasible to still charge that?