Sooooo, OS 3.0 will be released....tomorrow?
Ya. I'm curious as to how it will work on my 1st gen iPhone. Either way though, I'm getting a 3GS very soon.
Sooooo, OS 3.0 will be released....tomorrow?
UPS should be able to hold them. They did it for the Harry Potter books. I think a company as big as Apple should be able to manage the same thing.
Of course, I hope not, because I want mine tomorrow.
I don't know if anyone of you have noticed, but the 3GS carries the same baseband version as on the 3G(04.26.08). Having in mind that the iphone dev team has it unlocked this is more than great news.
This again?This, again?
2-year contract, you signed it. iPhone 3G bought with subsidized pricing, you did it. AT&T has a lot of things wrong when it comes to the iPhone, but not letting you upgrade to the iPhone 3G S isn't one of those things. ANY OTHER phone you buy from AT&T does not let you upgrade earlier than your 2-year contract allows. Why should AT&T have to take a bath on your subsidy being paid back so that you can have the "latest and greatest"?
Like I said, AT&T's not always right, but in this case, they are 100%.
I'm pretty disappointed. I shell out $120+ a month for service with AT&T, but I'm not eligible for an upgrade until March 2010... otherwise, it's going to cost me $599 to get the new iPhone... I wish Apple had made it so iPhone could be used on any carrier
![]()
No, mine still says "In Progress". I pre ordered from AT&T's website on June 9 around 12pm eastern. I am a new AT&T customer and I'm transferring my number from Verizon.
This isn't correct. You can get it for $399 if you re-up your two-year contract.
This again?
I registered specifically to address this line of thinking--as AT&T is 100% wrong.
AT&T should cater to its enthusiast base, and figure out how to adapt to that which is a unique opportunity: being the exclusive US carrier of the iPhone.
Apple is on record as saying the iPhone will be a "summer event". There is clearly room for interpretation as to exactly what this means, but I, and others, expect an annual hardware revision.
Show me another device with an expected annual refresh of its hardware.
I was in line the day the iPhone 3G was released and I discussed the upgrade issue at that time with others in line. I hoped that AT&T would figure it out in the coming months. AT&T did not.
Part of the problem is "upgrade eligibility". It is not defined. You may be eligible for an upgrade 12-24 months into your contract. There is ample speculation on the contributing factors: length of service with AT&T (and its previous incarnations); monthly service bill; family vs. individual plan; number of iPhones on a family plan; credit and/or bill pay history.
One factor OUGHT to be considered: early adopter.
I recognize that the contract I sign with AT&T is for the service it renders, and I am beholden to its service for the duration of the contract, else I face an early termination fee. As such, AT&T knows my monthly bill minimum, and has reason to believe that I will continue to pay per my current level of service. That subscription fee ($240/mo), and the fact that I am a current subscriber, is what is of value to AT&T.
If the subsidy needs to be reworked, then do it. If the price paid to Apple needs to be modified, then do it. But, as some first-day subscribers are eligible for an upgrade on July 12, 2009, it is ludicrous to deny a service resubscription to the most adamant followers of a device. "Upgrade eligibility" is already a loose term; flex it to allow upgrade pricing for early adopters.
Doing so would demonstrate AT&T's commitment to the Apple/AT&T relationship, and people would be happy. Happy subscribers, and subscriber retention, is far more important than a slight hardware subsidy.
AT&T looked poor after a fine WWDC. The opportunity was there, and AT&T did not deliver with MMS or tethering. Granted, the partnership is on rocky terms, and each side is attempting to wield whatever power it may have, but the result of the tension alienates the enthusiast. And that's bad business.
Wait what?
Are you sure? If that's the actual case, that's amazig! Thanks for ponying that out!
This again?
I registered specifically to address this line of thinking--as AT&T is 100% wrong.
AT&T should cater to its enthusiast base, and figure out how to adapt to that which is a unique opportunity: being the exclusive US carrier of the iPhone.
Apple is on record as saying the iPhone will be a "summer event". There is clearly room for interpretation as to exactly what this means, but I, and others, expect an annual hardware revision.
Show me another device with an expected annual refresh of its hardware.
I was in line the day the iPhone 3G was released and I discussed the upgrade issue at that time with others in line. I hoped that AT&T would figure it out in the coming months. AT&T did not.
Part of the problem is "upgrade eligibility". It is not defined. You may be eligible for an upgrade 12-24 months into your contract. There is ample speculation on the contributing factors: length of service with AT&T (and its previous incarnations); monthly service bill; family vs. individual plan; number of iPhones on a family plan; credit and/or bill pay history.
One factor OUGHT to be considered: early adopter.
I recognize that the contract I sign with AT&T is for the service it renders, and I am beholden to its service for the duration of the contract, else I face an early termination fee. As such, AT&T knows my monthly bill minimum, and has reason to believe that I will continue to pay per my current level of service. That subscription fee ($240/mo), and the fact that I am a current subscriber, is what is of value to AT&T.
If the subsidy needs to be reworked, then do it. If the price paid to Apple needs to be modified, then do it. But, as some first-day subscribers are eligible for an upgrade on July 12, 2009, it is ludicrous to deny a service resubscription to the most adamant followers of a device. "Upgrade eligibility" is already a loose term; flex it to allow upgrade pricing for early adopters.
Doing so would demonstrate AT&T's commitment to the Apple/AT&T relationship, and people would be happy. Happy subscribers, and subscriber retention, is far more important than a slight hardware subsidy.
AT&T looked poor after a fine WWDC. The opportunity was there, and AT&T did not deliver with MMS or tethering. Granted, the partnership is on rocky terms, and each side is attempting to wield whatever power it may have, but the result of the tension alienates the enthusiast. And that's bad business.
Oh man, what is wrong with this guy? The video is crap! It showed nothing interesting at all.
Obviously anyone that is even remotely interested in the new iPhone 3GS wants to see how fast it loads and renders web pages over WiFi! Similarly, they want to see how fast Safari is at zooming, panning, and scrolling!
Not to mention where is the speed comparison to the iPhone 3G?
Package Progress
Location Date Local Time Description
CHEK LAP KOK, HK
06/16/2009 11:14 P.M. ORIGIN SCAN
06/16/2009 7:49 P.M. DEPARTURE SCAN
SHENZHEN ,CN 06/15/2009 9:08 P.M. ORIGIN SCAN
CN 06/16/2009 1:10 A.M. BILLING INFORMATION RECEIVED
This again?
I registered specifically to address this line of thinking--as AT&T is 100% wrong.
AT&T should cater to its enthusiast base, and figure out how to adapt to that which is a unique opportunity: being the exclusive US carrier of the iPhone.
Apple is on record as saying the iPhone will be a "summer event". There is clearly room for interpretation as to exactly what this means, but I, and others, expect an annual hardware revision.
Show me another device with an expected annual refresh of its hardware.
I was in line the day the iPhone 3G was released and I discussed the upgrade issue at that time with others in line. I hoped that AT&T would figure it out in the coming months. AT&T did not.
Part of the problem is "upgrade eligibility". It is not defined. You may be eligible for an upgrade 12-24 months into your contract. There is ample speculation on the contributing factors: length of service with AT&T (and its previous incarnations); monthly service bill; family vs. individual plan; number of iPhones on a family plan; credit and/or bill pay history.
One factor OUGHT to be considered: early adopter.
I recognize that the contract I sign with AT&T is for the service it renders, and I am beholden to its service for the duration of the contract, else I face an early termination fee. As such, AT&T knows my monthly bill minimum, and has reason to believe that I will continue to pay per my current level of service. That subscription fee ($240/mo), and the fact that I am a current subscriber, is what is of value to AT&T.
If the subsidy needs to be reworked, then do it. If the price paid to Apple needs to be modified, then do it. But, as some first-day subscribers are eligible for an upgrade on July 12, 2009, it is ludicrous to deny a service resubscription to the most adamant followers of a device. "Upgrade eligibility" is already a loose term; flex it to allow upgrade pricing for early adopters.
Doing so would demonstrate AT&T's commitment to the Apple/AT&T relationship, and people would be happy. Happy subscribers, and subscriber retention, is far more important than a slight hardware subsidy.
AT&T looked poor after a fine WWDC. The opportunity was there, and AT&T did not deliver with MMS or tethering. Granted, the partnership is on rocky terms, and each side is attempting to wield whatever power it may have, but the result of the tension alienates the enthusiast. And that's bad business.
This again?
I registered specifically to address this line of thinking--as AT&T is 100% wrong.
AT&T should cater to its enthusiast base, and figure out how to adapt to that which is a unique opportunity: being the exclusive US carrier of the iPhone.
Apple is on record as saying the iPhone will be a "summer event". There is clearly room for interpretation as to exactly what this means, but I, and others, expect an annual hardware revision.
Show me another device with an expected annual refresh of its hardware.
I was in line the day the iPhone 3G was released and I discussed the upgrade issue at that time with others in line. I hoped that AT&T would figure it out in the coming months. AT&T did not.
Part of the problem is "upgrade eligibility". It is not defined. You may be eligible for an upgrade 12-24 months into your contract. There is ample speculation on the contributing factors: length of service with AT&T (and its previous incarnations); monthly service bill; family vs. individual plan; number of iPhones on a family plan; credit and/or bill pay history.
One factor OUGHT to be considered: early adopter.
I recognize that the contract I sign with AT&T is for the service it renders, and I am beholden to its service for the duration of the contract, else I face an early termination fee. As such, AT&T knows my monthly bill minimum, and has reason to believe that I will continue to pay per my current level of service. That subscription fee ($240/mo), and the fact that I am a current subscriber, is what is of value to AT&T.
If the subsidy needs to be reworked, then do it. If the price paid to Apple needs to be modified, then do it. But, as some first-day subscribers are eligible for an upgrade on July 12, 2009, it is ludicrous to deny a service resubscription to the most adamant followers of a device. "Upgrade eligibility" is already a loose term; flex it to allow upgrade pricing for early adopters.
Doing so would demonstrate AT&T's commitment to the Apple/AT&T relationship, and people would be happy. Happy subscribers, and subscriber retention, is far more important than a slight hardware subsidy.
AT&T looked poor after a fine WWDC. The opportunity was there, and AT&T did not deliver with MMS or tethering. Granted, the partnership is on rocky terms, and each side is attempting to wield whatever power it may have, but the result of the tension alienates the enthusiast. And that's bad business.
We ship hardware with UPS all the time, they don't have a control system once its out unless you call for each package and even then it's a crapshoot. If anything it would cost apple more money to force a stop. I think there's a good chance you'll get your as stated.
EDIT: You want it bad enough, you can go to the UPS shipping depot once it arrives at your city and give them the tracking number before it gets on a truck.
This again?
I registered specifically to address this line of thinking--as AT&T is 100% wrong.
AT&T should cater to its enthusiast base, and figure out how to adapt to that which is a unique opportunity: being the exclusive US carrier of the iPhone.
that song reminds me of my college days when i would pass out and wake up the next day with really lower lower back pains.
Wow, you registered just to post that garbage?
First off, you are not an early adopter. You waited for the 2nd revision of the phone, so you are not even close to an early adopter. Early adopter would be someone like myself, who sight unseen got an iPhone based on my belief that Apple would put out a great product because the previews and their history seemed to lead me to believe that was the case. I bought it the first week, and my 2 years is up.
You all think that you should get some special deal is absurd. AT&T and Apple are in this to make money. If you buy a phone subsidized, then you have to re-pay that committment. They can't let you just keep extending it as there is a max term fee. Otherwise people would just get like a 10 year committment and then terminate.
Stop crying and buy the phone if you want it now, otherwise wait. I don't love AT&T, but they are in this to make money, as any good company should be. Companies make money, people keep their jobs, we get the service we desire for the products we desire, etc.