You are talking about Samsung, HTC, RIM, Nokia, right?
They didn't show the stock price during the keynote because it was about products, not about shares. And as usual, the shares dropped because the idiots were missing a "5" in the announcement, then the ones with brains loaded up on cheap shares and made $15 profit in a very short time.
They didn't show the stock price because it would have been meaningless. Stock prices drop and news because the price was built on the rumors. The only way they don't drop is if rumors were way off. For example they got a bounce during original iPad announcement because rumors were way off on price.
Your later point is right, the minute to minute price during the announcement is just day traders taking advantage of morons.
$100 more
They finally caught up with the processor, which is 6 months old, considering the quad core processors are going to be out soon. The speed is now in par with the Samsung Galaxy SII -Finally-.
The antenna they broke is fixed in this version, paying for a fix?
upgraded camera, other phones have had it.
siris or whatever, which is pretty much in every phone by now -Not specifically Siris, but Android has a voice thing like that-.
Galaxy SII still beats this phone in every way, and when the iPhone 5 is out, the galaxy S III will be out with a quad core processor and the newest android OS.
Except the SII doesn't actually beat the Iphone 4 in any meaningful way. Not in usability, sales, customer satisfaction. Only on Spec sheets designed to impress nerds. Not for people that want to use a well built smartphone. For example, the camera is great if you are a nerd who wants to edit every photo before sharing. For everyone else, the iPhone 4 is better. I know you thought it was about megapixels, but you are often misguided. The antenna was never really broken. See they sold about 90 million of those broken antenna's and managed to keep a satisfaction rating about 35% higher than their nearest competitor...
Do you see what you did? You said it will win because it will have a quad-core processor. The problem is , that is not how you win, nobody cares, and that does not make it a better phone in any way. Have you ever even used one? Sometimes I get the feeling I am the only one commenting on the SII that has actually used one.
It is ok, not great. Lots of performance hiccups. Way underperforms the hardware your paying for. The browser is pretty good. The camera is absurdly slow. The UI is clunky, the buttons all perform random context based behaviors that vary significantly even between internal apps (I assume this is an Android feature). Sure it is better than most of the old Windows CE phones, but it is not comparable to any current iOS device even the 3GS. If Microsoft can ever do anything meaningful with Windows Mobile, it would become the main iOS alternative.
Print that spec sheet out and tape it to the back so you can remember what you were so excited about when you ordered it.