they were all over the separate sensor for increased accuracy.
They still never claimed either the old one or the new one were precision devices. Also, the biggest benefit they pointed out was increased battery life.
they were all over the separate sensor for increased accuracy.
They still never claimed either the old one or the new one were precision devices. Also, the biggest benefit they pointed out was increased battery life.
I have a week 35 16gb space grey 5s tmobile and it's 3 degrees off. One of the problems may be the phone is a little bent near the volume key ( my phone has always been in my front pocket and never heated. All I have on it is a bumper case and screen protector on both sides)
hi, can u try on the floor?
What about on the right side and bottom?
I think what we are seeing with this issue is the result of poor QC at the factory to get phones produced and shipped out to meet Apple's demands. No doubt in my mind calibration and/or testing procedures were skipped or ignored to get them out the door on time. Even then, they still could not meet initial demand. How many strikes is Foxconn going to get? Last year is was the scuffgate issue, now this year its the compass/gyro. Apple needs to seriously consider taking their business elsewhere. With each batch of phones, a certain number is taken out for testing. To believe that every one pulled out for testing was perfect is foolish. In fact, most pulled out would have failed based on the numbers we are seeing. Yet they were allowed to continue on their way hoping people would not notice. If one thing Apple should have learned from last year, is that Apple owners will go over their new phones with a microscope and test every feature. And because of that, any flaw discovered will spread rapidly across the internet and through the media.
I'm certain that Apple is fixing it at the source in Manufacturing. (Afterall, the parts and process can't be dramatically different from the iPhone 5 that works fine.) It will take some time for those new ones to arrive.
Do any hardware gurus here think that it will be an easy fix
You seriously underestimate manufacturing challenges and overestimate the abilities of manufacturers able to address such a large volume.
That said, this is likely addressable via software if there even is a hardware issue.
Nobody but Apple, if Apple, has enough data to know if it is hardware or not.
Relax and give the powers that be time to analyze and fix the issue.
As requested. It appears depending on where it is it is either perfect or -1° off. Sorry for the awful darkness in the first two photos.
Extra info: it's a 64 GB Silver AT&T
How do you determine the week that it was manufactured? We need to get a tally of when the hardware is corrected in manufacturing...
thanks, good but still off, I think if u run a level app like ihandy level you'll find that it's probably more than -1 probably -1.8 the apple app rounds up.
I'm not convinced it is a hardware "problem" rather than a hardware "difference" that the software is not properly handling.
I don't know about other countries but in the UK anything sold must by law be fit for purpose. If not then you are entitled to your money back.
So if Apple advertises it's new coprocessor chip saying
"...it takes advantage of all these great sensors... it measures from the accelerometer, the gyroscope and the compass, and with new software and applications you're going to get a whole new level of health and fitness solutions never before possible on a mobile phone"
(Phil Schiller, 2013 keynote)
and it turns out that data has significant errors that render it useless, then (UK) users are entitled to their money back.
Anyway, they replaced the phones and claim it is a software problem. However, I kind of feel like if it was a software problem then why would they replace the phones at all? (Keep in mind this was an under warranty replacement, not a return or exchange).
Like I said, just thought I would share about my own experience.
There's a merchantability standard under the US, as well. However, Apple doesn't advertise the phone as being fit for purpose as a precision compass or level. They advertise it as a phone with enhanced capabilities.The flaws aren't so significant that they render useless the health and fitness capabilities of potential applications (that Apple is not promising to deliver). I doubt you would find a court anywhere that would agree that a minor error in the sensors renders the iPhone unfit for purpose, except perhaps a plaintiff-friendly jurisdiction, and even then likely the appellate court in that state would overturn it. You might see a class action, but those are usually settled for relatively minor sums to avoid the nuisance.
Anyway, they replaced the phones and claim it is a software problem. However, I kind of feel like if it was a software problem then why would they replace the phones at all? (Keep in mind this was an under warranty replacement, not a return or exchange).
Like I said, just thought I would share about my own experience.