I wonder if people would be more inclined to spend an extra $100 for battery improvements instead of storage bumps?
For example, the base model iPhone could come with 32/64GB but the standard battery. For $100 more, you get 64GB but a battery that lasts twice as long. Not sure how that would work out but it's an idea.
This is why Apple don't publish specs.
The rated capacity of the battery is a minor technical detail. The things that matter are all higher-order problems such as how much life you can get out of it and how much of that life it keeps with wear-and-tear.
It's the same deal with all of the other specs. You don't really care how many cores the CPU has or how much RAM is in there, you care that it's always responsive and that you don't need to wait for things to load.
You're all talking about this battery with none of the really important technical insight whatsoever. Maybe these batteries have a smaller initial capacity, but retain more of it after 12 months than the previous components. Maybe they've got better controller chips in the hardware so you still get more life. I don't know. You don't know. Don't worry about it.
Don't waste time sweating about things you don't really understand in enough depth to pass judgement on. I'm an electronic engineer who works in nanotechnology, and even I don't know enough to make any kind of judgement about this design decision.
Everybody's also forgotten about component cost. The new iPhones contain plenty of components which weren't in the last iPhone in any form (e.g. 3D touch, haptic engine). That's additional cost that has to be made up somewhere - either from Apple's margins (which could still be the case) or by using cheaper components elsewhere. If they tested these batteries and found they got the same lifetime as the previous generation while using a cheaper component, most engineers would consider that a pretty good solution.
As long as I get the same battery life.
It's 20 grams heavier and slightly thicker.
Agreed! I made the same comment last week. Apple should update their specs for iPhone 6 since they are still selling it. Most new iPhone 6 will come with iOS 9 pre installed and if their claim of an extra hour is true, product specs need to be updated.So when Apple says that the iPhone 6s will have the same battery life as the 6, presumably they mean the iPhone 6 running iOS8 and the 6s on iOS9. And I would assume that iOS9 is a more efficient OS than 8. So comparing apples to apples, the new phones will have worse battery life.
I don't expect and never expect the battery to improve in an S model. What would be disappointing is if it went backwards. I can't recall any S model that dramatically or meaningfully improved battery life.As long as you get the same battery life? you kidding me? Apple needs to be improving things like battery life, not the reverse. Hard to view a smaller battery in the same "form/size" as a great development. Nothing from this model change shows anything to change the fact that iphones guzzle batteries and apple is doing very little to change that.
But instead of always having the same battery life, why can't we have better?
That's easy for you to say. What is your knowledge of the current status of the battery industry and research and development as it applies to the iPhone today? You people love to moan and groan and to demand the world without any clue as to it's feasibility. Have you ever heard of making compromises? Apple decided to make other improvements rather than increase battery capacity. In another thread I did the math and showed that the small increase in battery capacity that would make you happy would probably only give you a few extra minutes over the coarse of the day. You people really need to think before you make your knee jerk responses that almost inevitably end up being absurd and way overblown. Many of you just seem to like to embarrass yourselves with your statement rather than to step back for a moment and be logical and practical. Sheesh.
When Apple's official pictures of the phone (in this case, the 6) remove the protruding camera, that to me rings alarm bells. It implies that the design really was contrary to Apple's standards and mentality, just because Butterblimp Jony gets a raging clue from an extra particle of thinness.
The only protruding thing from Jony Ive should be his belly.
![]()
I just want A SMALL PHONE!!!! A phone should be useable with one hand only. I regret "upgrading" to the 6....
I've been an Apple-only person since my PB140 (thats 25 years ago....) but now Im tempted to go to android to get something like the size of the 5s that I loved.
agreed, don't like the camera bulge... BUT most people use cases and cases generally are thicker than the bulge... so doesn't that make it fine?
I feel the same way. I have had every iPhone up untill the 5S. Id never thought I would skip a generation, much less two, but I hate both the size and design of the 6(s), so I will pass on this. The smaller battery solidifies that decission.I just want A SMALL PHONE!!!! A phone should be useable with one hand only. I regret "upgrading" to the 6....
I've been an Apple-only person since my PB140 (thats 25 years ago....) but now Im tempted to go to android to get something like the size of the 5s that I loved.
I just want A SMALL PHONE!!!! A phone should be useable with one hand only. I regret "upgrading" to the 6....
I've been an Apple-only person since my PB140 (thats 25 years ago....) but now Im tempted to go to android to get something like the size of the 5s that I loved.
Same here. Upgrading from the 5. Enjoy the latest and greatest.Im coming from 1,570mAh on iPhone 5s, so I am still happy lol
that is really just marginal I mean like 1-3% if even that. You would get that variability based on just quality of output. li ion is what it is there is no way around it. I mean apple did say they improved the battery chemisty for one of the MB pros i remember but most people said it was barely any different.Not completely different, subtly different. You do know variability between manufacturers plays a role too, right?