Speakers 4/5 of an inch from each other are not stereo. But someone keeps pushing that theme to the ignorant.
Speakers 4/5 of an inch from each other are not stereo. But someone keeps pushing that theme to the ignorant.
And if someone wants to listent to music while charging their iPhone?
It's the same problem but even worse with the MacBook. How does one backup to a Time Machine drive if they need to charge their MacBook? Apparently someone in a high place at Apple believes people drop everything they're doing while their devices charge.
No, Apple aren't sold on the idea of lightning being the replacement for 3.5mm likely since it isn't a universal standard. They know that Bluetooth is the replacement but there is the issue of cost when including it with every iPhone. This is the better option as it can be used with the included headphones and existing headphones, and is much cheaper than including Bluetooth earphones. The USB C thing is likely to happen with this model or the 10th anniversary model although I expect it will be standard for the next iPad Pros.I still don't buy this rumor about shipping with a dongle. I think if they drop the 3.5mm jack they will ship with lightning EarPods. Shipping with a lightning to 3.5mm adaptor and the same old EarPods will make people think that nothing has changed soundwise and make them mad at Apple for dropping the port. If Apple announces "New and improved" lightning EarPods included with the iPhone 7 with digital sound people will automatically think that they sound way better (even if they don't in reality). That is the power of marketing.
I'm also thinking it will ship with the lightning to USB-C cable and a new USB-C power adaptor.
If you want to keep using your old headphones you will need to buy a lightning to 3.5mm adaptor, that will probably cost somewhere between $20-30.
I'm so excited to skip the iPhone 7!
Personally, while I think including a (free) dongle is a great move, I believe Apple needs to really push wireless headphones.
I'm not sure why people would be upset about a rumored second speaker. Also, I'm not exactly sure if anyone is upset about a rumored second speaker. To be fair, I haven't read every comment so there may be someone upset about it.I'm curious why people are upset about the rumored second speaker. I understand being bothered by Apple's making this a key feature in all of their advertising. But that's not happening. Apple hasn't even acknowledged that there is a second speaker.
People are imagining what Apple will do and then getting angry with their own imagination
I'm curious why people are upset about the rumored second speaker. I understand being bothered by Apple's making this a key feature in all of their advertising. But that's not happening. Apple hasn't even acknowledged that there is a second speaker.
People are imagining what Apple will do and then getting angry with their own imagination
Sounds unlikely
I think they're doing it wrong to move towards Lightninh headphones. The right move for the iPhone 7 would have been to keep the 3.5mm jack, but include Lightning earbuds.
[doublepost=1469217891][/doublepost]
I think it's more people being upset at Apple to "justify" removing a universal connector and trying to smooth it out with "but we gave you stereo speakers instead".
Technically you're right. But I have found that relying on "technically" as part of a features argument is tantamount to pushing a load of marketing bs. If the effect is barely perceptible then it's useless from a practicality standpoint and serves as nothing more than a bullet point on a marketing campaign.
Why would you, an intelligent person, be okay with the term here? You've already admitted it's, in your own words, barely perceptible. Heck, even speakers on the top and bottom would yield minimal stereo separation. Small speakers that close together is stereo only in the most pedantic sense. Is it okay because it's Apple and not Samsung or any other handset manufacturer? Genuinely curious.
the new mac/samsung/headphone jack replaced/pokemon/click bait-rumors.com
A bank have said this? I smell . It would be un-Apple like though.
We're getting close now however. Can't wait for the dual-camera's and water-resistant on the Plus. And regardless of what people think, it'll sell like hot cakes.
As soon as you see the promotion pictures, you'll be all over it.
What would you do with the much larger opening that is lightning port, or the multiple openings of the speaker (rumored to be even more than currently)? If Samsung can get an IP68 rating with a headphone jack, it was not an impediment to adding water resistance. That IP68 rating is the highest practical rating for phones. I say practical because there is IP69K, but qualifying for that rating is impractical in a phone. Although, if Apple did try, I don't think anyone would complain. That would definitely be innovative.My speculation based on Apple's previous tendencies would be that Apple would try to one-up the limited waterproofing of Samsung's phones by increasing the depth of water exposure. If Apple could somehow engineer their phones to be waterproof to 3 or so metres then I would be sold on the requirement of removing the headphone jack.
You guys are correct, two speakers only a few centimeters apart won't give much stereo separation, however they will probably be louder, and most people equate louder with better.
I think they're doing it wrong to move towards Lightninh headphones. The right move for the iPhone 7 would have been to keep the 3.5mm jack, but include Lightning earbuds.
[doublepost=1469217891][/doublepost]
I think it's more people being upset at Apple to "justify" removing a universal connector and trying to smooth it out with "but we gave you stereo speakers instead".