Software yes. Hardware no.Love my Jet Black 7 Plus.Simply the best smartphone on the market, hardware and software.
Software yes. Hardware no.Love my Jet Black 7 Plus.Simply the best smartphone on the market, hardware and software.
Nice to see you four years later... also, four years later, you still think exactly the same thing about everything? Kobe is the best active player, the NY Giants still reigning champs, stock market is still doing poorly....I thought you don't need more than 3.5"? Guess all the apologists are wrong again.
I carry the 6+ in my front jeans pocket with no problems. I don't have what you'd call a rugged case, but it's at least as thick as a rugged case would be. I use the Book Book from 12 South.No skinny jeans for me.But I do need a rugged case, Lifeproof Fre, Otterbox Defender, etc. And the Plus models get huge in those cases, so no bezels would be a big help.
Because he always said phones should be for one handed use. That was his whole point of taking the mick out of bigger phones at the time. Being able to touch the top of the device with one hand.
I swear people think Steve Jobs made amazing decisions each time and it would just carry on each year as other companies got better. If anything he was stubborn
I think they have probably calculated the overall costs of overestimating vs. the costs of underestimating, and have decided that carrying a lot of phones that aren't popular is more expensive than building to order (even taking into account the possible lost sales from those who go elsewhere).They always seem to underestimate their sales at the beginning of a new cycle and have shortages. You would think they would be better at avoiding shortages by now.
Tim how about doing something with the larger screen?
i swear the apple software team is on vacation.
we have **** mail app, siri, calendar, and ios that doesn't offer anything more other than rotating icons in landscape
but open that app then it goes back to portrait .
I'll be the 1st to say this but Steve Jobs would have never let that happen.
While true that the consumer often pays less or thinks they do (spread out over years baked into the bill) Apple still makes their sale on each device. They money flows into their account either way...they don't give phones away via carriers., the revenue rolls in regardless of the source.That's in part because the phone was heavily discounted through trade-in programs when it first came out.
I am not a fan of these giant slabs as phones, but I don't begrudge them to others who like the larger sizes.
Personally I prefer the relatively compact size of the SE, and I hope Apple continue to make phones in all the sizes they currently do.
Software yes. Hardware no.
While maybe thats true but steve jobs died before companies like samsung made a breakthrough. Who knows how steve would of responded to the comp and if he would of forced the issue.Sadly that apple is lonnnng gone. Steve wanted disharmony and competition between departments. Let the cream rise to the top. Under Tim its about harmony. Not saying Tim is a bad leader, but Steve was one of a kind, a True visionary we only get those once 20-30 years.
This shouldn't be a surprise to anyone. THEY GAVE THE PHONE AWAY FOR FREE (or close to it)! Of course the phone is popular when the price is $100 after the credit most carriers were giving away, an unprecedented act in the history of the iPhone. Mine was $200. It's disingenuous of him to act like the this was a huge sales success when it was orders of magnitude cheaper for a large percentage of owners than the 6 and 6S was.
I really don't like the plus. It's a pain to design for, so most apps are just blown up versions of the 4.7" layout. Sure, 4" was cramped if you're gonna read articles on it all day, but for typical use, there's no doubt that it's the ideal size. I'm a big guy, but even I can't reach navigation buttons on the 4.7" with one hand.
Weren't there only about 3 million Galaxy Note 7's out in the world when the recall happened?
So even if every single Galaxy Note 7 was replaced with an iPhone (it wasn't)... the most it could have been was 3 million out of Apple's 78 million iPhone last quarter.
Sure... Samsung's battery situation might have sold some iPhones... but it wasn't the primary reason for Apple's "record breaking sales"
Weren't there only about 3 million Galaxy Note 7's out in the world when the recall happened?
So even if every single Galaxy Note 7 was replaced with an iPhone (it wasn't)... the most it could have been was 3 million out of Apple's 78 million iPhone last quarter.
Sure... Samsung's battery situation might have sold some iPhones... but it wasn't the primary reason for Apple's "record breaking sales"
The vast majority of iPhone sales are outside the US where this subsidy model does not exist. It probably had a negligible effect on the decision of people to buy Apple.
You should reread your post. These were three million out at that point but there were many prospective buyers who hadn't bought the note yet, who would have bought it if they hadn't discontinued it.
That logic doesn't make sense. It isn't only the amount that were already out there but the expected amount to be sold after that. Nobody knows for sure how many people that couldn't buy a Note bought iPhones.
The 3 million already out probably had less impact on this as they were offered replacements for S7 and S7 Edge etc. It is the tens of millions of phones Samsung couldn't move but were expected to that is the story in that.
Samsung could not move over 30 million (more or less) direct competitors to the market place to oppose the iPhone 7. If you can't see how that is definitely a help to Apple I don't know what to tell you.
Also it wasn't just the Note it tarnished Samsung's brand and many people stayed away from other models because of the embarrassment of it all. After that happened Samsung was shunned by many people.