Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
i was in store playing with the new iphone 7's. I have an iphone 6 plus and honestly i didn't see a massive improvement.

If any of you are on the fence upgrading do yourself a favor and visit the store.

The iphone 7 doesn't feel that much newer than the 2 year old iphone 6.
Apple just needed to add a new case - then people will see the improvement :p
 
Last edited:
At arm's lenght, it doesn't matter if it has 1440p or 1080p, everything above 280-300 dpi looks the same.

I love how Apple apologists always are careful to proclaim a "good enough" threshold in specs that includes all of Apple's products.

Obviously devices are not always held at arm's length. Higher pixel density shows more detail which can be appreciated by closer inspection. Well, unless you're an old geezer in need of reading glasses....or an Apple fanboi.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ABC5S
And what about the resolution? Retina is not enough.

Apple's being particularly stubborn about this. A higher resolution screen will require more memory, a faster processor, a larger battery and software tweaks. They're probably waiting for the costs for such upgrades to drop a little more before pulling the trigger.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rGiskard
Better battery, better display, better CPU, better GPU, water-resistant. But looks a bit similar and it can't be a new generation. I don't get it.


I get it: the form could use a slight overhaul. But in the larger view, I think Apple are better off in the long run with what they've done and stuck with. Throwing in an edge-to-edge display would be a much easier task, comparatively. It'll happen; just don't expect it next year.

It's a good update, but I'm ready for a *great* update. Apple is already receiving criticism for the bezels, screen etc, I want them to knock everyone out of the park next year. Rumours are already flowing, I hope they come to fruition.
 
I personally feel that Apple was already far behind the competition when it came to their outdated LCD display tech found in the 6S and earlier, that any improvement made to iDevice screens would be a long-overdue and much welcomed and noteworthy update as in the 7. Should be interesting to see if this is simply a stepping-stone incremental update as we prepare for Apple's rumored move to AMOLED/OLED/or equivalent next year.
 
I see this as great news for next year (if rumors are true) and they go with OLED because Apple will demand from their suppliers this level of color accuracy in their panels - a win win for us
 
Last edited:
I love how Apple apologists always are careful to proclaim a "good enough" threshold in specs that includes all of Apple's products.

Obviously devices are not always held at arm's length. Higher pixel density shows more detail which can be appreciated by closer inspection. Well, unless you're an old geezer in need of reading glasses....or an Apple fanboi.

I've used a lot of devices and really don't care about the pixel race. Can I notice a difference between something like the iPhone and the Note 7? Nope. Do I care? Nope. For me personally there are many advantages of using iOS over Android. I feel sad for anyone that has to compare numbers to justify their pick of a product. Buy/use what you like and let others do the same, believe it or not .. not everyone shares the same likes and dislikes as you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mactendo
That's one review of a hand picked sample. A lot of MR readers would say otherwise. I.e. worse than the 6 series on their phone.

Basically this review means jack. Too many new ip7 owners are complaining of yellow dim screens. This review sounds more like a paid ad from Apple.

Displaymate's Dr. Soneira has been doing unbiased reviews for over a decade. More likely, the yellow iP7 screens are the result of manufacturing bugs that need to be worked out. Yet another reason to wait a few months after each iPhone release before buying.
 
Easy solution- stop giving them money. Don't like the way Apple does business? Don't give them your business. If you think you're getting the short end of the stick, stop buying their sticks. Those of us that still feel like we're getting what we want will continue to buy Apple products, and those that don't have other options.

Such a simple and easy solution. I'm astonished some people aren't able to do that and instead complain and cry day in and day out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bchreng
DCI-P3 Wide Color Gamut is also featured in the 5K iMacs, bringing them up to spec.

Not quite Adobe 98 though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rGiskard
Such a simple and easy solution. I'm astonished some people aren't able to do that and instead complain and cry day in and day out.
I think it bugs them that some people don't feel as strongly as they do.

I sure hope Apple fans aren't as bad on Samsung forums as Samsung fans are here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jax44
Here's the data. http://www.displaymate.com/iPhone7_ShootOut_1.htm#Colors_Intensities

Their iPhone 6 example had a white point of 7,241K. The iPhone 7 example is at 6,806K.



So no wonder people are reporting 'yellow' screens. It will continue as Apple further improves things and comes closer to the 6.500K ideal.
I always like to be at industry standards when it comes to video calibration. My Samsung plasma is ISF calibrated and I love it. An iPhone with proper calibration is what I'm looking for so kudos to Apple for continuing the trend.

On the other hand, people have various opinions on what the ideal screen looks like. I know multiple people that enjoy watching movies at 48fps, while I can't even watch a movie at that frame rate. Does it make them wrong that they enjoy higher frames than I do? No. It's all subjective.

The same could be said for smartphone displays. One person gets their phone and says "eww this is yellow, I'm retuning it". On the other hand, a different person will see the same screen and say "wow, this screen looks perfect!".

As they say, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
 



iphone-7-front-back.jpg
DisplayMate Technologies has declared iPhone 7 has the "best LCD display" it has ever tested, calling it "truly impressive" and a "major upgrade" over the iPhone 6 based on a series of advanced viewing tests and measurements.

iPhone 7 achieved the highest color accuracy, peak brightness, and contrast rating in bright light of any smartphone display, the highest contrast ratio of any IPS LCD display, and the lowest screen reflectance of any smartphone display.

Apple's latest flagship smartphone also has image contrast and intensity described as "visually indistinguishable from perfect," and the smallest color variation when viewing the screen at an angle of any smartphone display.

Color Accuracy and Power Efficiency

iPhone 7 has two color gamuts, including a new 26% larger DCI-P3 Wide Color Gamut, as found in 4K TVs, and a traditional, smaller sRGB / Rec.709 gamut. DisplayMate said both gamuts have been implemented with absolute color accuracy that is "visually indistinguishable from perfect," which is "truly impressive" and a "major competitive advantage" over other smartphones.

DisplayMate said the iPhone 7 has "the most color accurate display" that it has ever measured, adding that the smartphone's display is "very likely considerably better than any mobile display, monitor, TV, or UHD TV" that consumers have. In technical terms, the iPhone 7 has a "Just Noticeable Color Difference" (JNCD) rating of 1.1, which is the best result of any smartphone it has ever tested.

Despite having a much wider color gamut, the iPhone 7's display is 7% more power efficient than the iPhone 6's display.Brightness

The measured peak brightness for the iPhone 7 is 602 cd/m2 (nits), the highest of any smartphone DisplayMate has ever tested.

The measurement increases up to a record 705 nits when Automatic Brightness is turned on under brightly lit conditions.Contrast Ratio

DisplayMate said the iPhone 7 has a record-breaking contrast ratio among IPS LCD smartphone displays.iPhone 7 also has the highest contrast rating (137 to 160) in high ambient light of any smartphone.

Reflectance

DisplayMate said iPhone 7 has 4.4% screen reflectance, which is a record low among smartphones it has ever tested.

However, the iPhone 7 doesn't come close to the record low 1.7% screen reflectance of the 9.7-inch iPad Pro, which has a special anti-reflective coating.Viewing Angle

DisplayMate said the iPhone 7 has "excellent viewing angle performance" with no visually noticeable color shifts. The display had the smallest color variation when viewed at an angle, earning a JNCD rating of 2.1 or less.DisplayMate shared more in-depth analysis in its iPhone 7 vs. iPhone 6 display shootout.

Article Link: iPhone 7's 'Best LCD Display Ever' Marks 'Major Upgrade Over iPhone 6'




Can some one answer this question


Where in the world these nice looking stock wallpaper is ...lol

I could not find in my iPhone 7

It is advertise on apple site and all over the net but it is missing in stock library ....
 
i was in store playing with the new iphone 7's. I have an iphone 6 plus and honestly i didn't see a massive improvement.

If any of you are on the fence upgrading do yourself a favor and visit the store.

The iphone 7 doesn't feel that much newer than the 2 year old iphone 6.

Thanks Mr. Samsung!
 
Easy solution- stop giving them money. Don't like the way Apple does business? Don't give them your business. If you think you're getting the short end of the stick, stop buying their sticks. Those of us that still feel like we're getting what we want will continue to buy Apple products, and those that don't have other options.
IMO all the phones out there have good things but bad things too, all of them Apple, Samsung, at then end of the day the customer decides but either way you go you will find flaws on any of them.

Of course a battery exploding is the winner here, no doubt, still paying so much for a phone that whines is pretty annoying too..
 
I've used a lot of devices and really don't care about the pixel race. Can I notice a difference between something like the iPhone and the Note 7? Nope. Do I care? Nope. For me personally there are many advantages of using iOS over Android. I feel sad for anyone that has to compare numbers to justify their pick of a product. Buy/use what you like and let others do the same, believe it or not .. not everyone shares the same likes and dislikes as you.

It's a valid standard of comparison whether you like it or not. Nobody says you MUST like high DPI screens, same as nobody forces you to need SoCs with high geekbench scores or devices with large amounts of NAND. Some people don't need a fast SoC or more than 16GB NAND and that's perfectly fine. So if you're eyesight isn't good enough, or your usage pattern doesn't take advantage of it, then greater detail isn't something you need and you should be happy because devices have pretty much met your needs on that front.

For the record, according to research, most people cannot see improvements over around 500 dpi, though some do notice greater detail up to 600 dpi or so. At such high dpi the gains in detail are realized only on close inspection so for many usage scenarios they don't matter.

But you know, it's all good, because in a few years Apple's flagship phone will boast an even higher DPI, and then all the fanbois will proclaim that anything less is unusable and OMG their photos are so amazing with 500dpi they can see things they never seen before!
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThaRuler
That's one review of a hand picked sample. A lot of MR readers would say otherwise. I.e. worse than the 6 series on their phone.

Basically this review means jack. Too many new ip7 owners are complaining of yellow dim screens. This review sounds more like a paid ad from Apple.

Read the forewords of the Display Mate's review: it is not a hand picked sample.

"And for those of you thinking of Emailing that we got hand-picked units, the iPhones were purchased retail from Verizon Wireless."

The display of my iPhone 7 is noticeably better than the display of my 6S: brighter with stunning colors.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rGiskard
what type of propaganda article is this! We know that rumors are that Apple is planning to switch to amoled, so this screen can't be that perfect!

This article is trying to promote the iphone 7. It's an advertisement and doesn't give a balance point of view.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThaRuler
It's a valid standard of comparison whether you like it or not. Nobody says you MUST like high DPI screens, same as nobody forces you to need SoCs with high geekbench scores or devices with large amounts of NAND. Some people don't need a fast SoC or more than 16GB NAND and that's perfectly fine. So if you're eyesight isn't good enough, or your usage pattern doesn't take advantage of it, then greater detail isn't something you need and you should be happy because devices have pretty much met your needs on that front.

For the record, according to research, most people cannot see improvements over around 500 dpi, though some do notice greater detail up to 600 dpi or so. At such high dpi the gains in detail are realized only on close inspection so for many usage scenarios they don't matter.

But you know, it's all good, because in a few years Apple's flagship phone will boast an even higher DPI, and then all the fanbois will proclaim that anything less is unusable and OMG their photos are so amazing with 500dpi they can see things they never seen before!

My eyesight is just fine, better than 20/20. My issue you guys all take is calling everyone a "fanboy" if they disagree with your assessment that it isn't good unless it has X DPI or X CPUs or this or that. You just seem really bitter that some people prefer something you do not. Why? Is it really that big of an issue if someone does? Again, it just seems to me there are so many bitter people that just can't get over the fact that others don't find important what they find important.

The only thing I have seen the race for higher DPI improve is VR. The issue with that is most people don't care about VR at this point, who knows if they will down the road either, it may remain a niche industry. Once you pass a certain point on a smaller screen it just doesn't matter. Sure, Apple will push out a higher DPI down the road, that's how things progress. Apple doesn't seem to care to be in the technology arms race because obviously their customers for the most part don't see a benefit to it. Our phones perform just fine, look just fine and do all that we need them to do. I prefer that they wait and let things be ironed out before adopting the next thing without knowing if it will be useful or not. Perfect example is HTC with the Thunderbolt, released a front facing camera with not a single piece of software that supported its use. I, and many others do not "need" to be at the front of all things technology, there are many issues being there.

Like what you like, use what you like, calling people fanboys because they disagree with you just makes you seem bitter and small minded.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.