Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I am getting next week a shiny new 32 gig iPhone 6 for 349 euro, it be a massive upgrade from my current iPhone 5. I am a sales rep that uses the phone all day, 5 did everything i needed, eyes getting older so bigger screen was only reason to finaly change. iPhone 8. Maybe in 4 years when i can get it for 350....
 
one grand for a phone, nice joke, most people will buy because they only want "show off" for others
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: WatchFromAfar
I will not spend $1,000 for 64gb of storage. I don't care whose name is on the smartphone. The base storage has to start at 128gb for me to be interested. I'm using an S8 at the moment and while I love the phone itself, I find Android to be clunky.
 
These prices man. Like $999? Around 64000INR plus tax. **** there are number of taxes in India, which will make an eye watering price of $1200 (approx).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Demo Kit
So that means it'll be like £1000 here in the UK thanx to Brexit destroying the Pound.

My iPhone 6s cost £500 for 64gb, why would I spend £1000 for a phone? The prices are getting out of hand, and it worries me because it means carriers will charge £70 a month for 2gb plans, and people will pay for it.... what are 30gb plans gonna be £120?

I'll just stick with my iPhone 6s and go for a cheaper month by month contract. That or just get an LG G6 which by then will be mega cheap as it's not selling.
 
I could buy a MacBook 12 at that price. I was thinking of not upgrading anyway as I'm starting graduate school in the fall. But at this price I definitely cannot afford iPhone 8.
 
Yay,, iPhone 8 would bump to over $1000 in Australia. Only the strong will survive.. :D ...literally..


(I'm not kidding)
 
Some of the comments from the 'ride or die' apple fanboys in this thread is ridiculous. They will defend apple no matter what and any cost.

People have every right to complain about the pricing. Apple gives us last year's technology with next year's prices. People don't have to buy it but apple customers have every right to complain.
 
There's no way Apple can limit their AR strategy to this "iPhone 8" model only; it would be suicide. Imagine:

Apple - "Yes our developers are working away on some cool new stuff, but you will need our expensive flagship device"
Public - "Ermm, I just spent $650-950 on a 7s/7s+, will that do?"
Apple - "You're so cute, no"

Apple chose to show off AR Kit with an iPad Pro so this iPhone 8 can't have anything, with regards to AR, that an iPad Pro doesn't or they would have held off and demoed it with an iPhone 8. I'd say the current iPhone 7 series will be the minimum requirement for future AR development.

Apple needs AR in the hands of many to succeed; it will not be limited to an iPhone 8.

Sure there is. Apple does this kind of segmentation all the time. Retina came to the iPhone 4 and then included it in iPads 1.5 years later. Touch ID first came to the iPhone then to the iPad a year later. Apple Pencil was first introduced in the original iPad Pro then came to the 9.7" model 6 months later. The iPhone 7+ has dual cameras with optical zoom and faux depth of field blurring while the iPhone 7 only has a single lens digital zoom. AW Series 2 is water resistant and has GPS, Series 1 has neither.

That is not to say AR won't make it to lower tiered models. It will. But Apple -- if you look at the prototypes of each and camera placement -- won't include it this year. Apple rarely rolls out big features across all models at the same time. Apple isn't alone in this practice. Car manufactures, for example, routinely launch new features first in their flagship model and then push out to lower level models as the cost of the feature declines.

The reason they demoed ARKit on the iPad Pro was not to sell AR on the iPad Pro but to show developers that the iPad Pro can do the work of a laptop. Apple is invested in convincing the world that tablets are the next laptop.
 
Never gonna happen. They're not gonna charge 1000 for an iphone. Its gonna be at the same price. if at all, 50 -100 hike. nothing more. Cant believe you guys believe this ****. Just coz they added all these new features, which should have been there a long time ago? Samsung already gives you all these features at the same price on the s8, etc. why would apple charge more?
 
THANK.YOU!

in this day and age, you can get a great, great Motorola G for less than $200, and it has specs that are comparable to iPhone.

Just like everything else, iPhone prices have to come down, not up. Apple seemed to finally get it with SE, so I hope the new phone isn't $1000
[doublepost=1503720325][/doublepost]
Because your laptop serves you 3 - 5 years, more with mac, your phone may or may not make the 2 year mark , 3 max

Exactly my point. You use your phone way more so it will wear much faster than your expensive Mac. The point is, if your phone is undeniably the most used device you have by far. Why should the iPhone be a cheap device? If people feel they want a cheap phone, then get a cheaper phone. No one is stopping you from getting one, people just need to stop complaining about iPhone prices. If you can’t afford it move along.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WatchFromAfar
Well pricing aren't going to improve. So it won't be just this year.

Most buy on contract anyway so should it be as big of an issue?
But it depends on how much the monthly cost is. I don't think I'd want to pay more than £80 a month for a phone. God I remember back in the day when phones were like £30 a month on contract. Every year the price goes up and up.
[doublepost=1503755947][/doublepost]
Just can't get that excited, at least yet. Sure it's got a slightly bigger screen, but it's too iterative. It's just another iPhone, with the same old icon based functionality and form factor. I'm feeling jaded. I've bought in to the newest iPhones before, then looked across at someone using an older machine a few weeks later, and you know what, we're both enjoying identical experiences, only my pockets are a lot lighter.
Lol most are acting like it's the second coming. Nice to have some perspective although I'd say it's a decent upgrade but nothing to jump up and down about considering that most of the features have been available on other devices for a while.
 
it really grates me that apple have always argued that it is not about revenue or profits, but about “great product”. It’s the marketing bull that grates me the most: it is about profit and revenue. Don’t market products as premium and deliver huge margins and then argue that it’s about great product. At the centre of this is Schiller: like many greats, he has spent too long with people telling him how brilliant he is; the lack of self doubt makes him a fool and those around him are even more foolish for continuing to buy into it. Add to that Eddy Cue in the background and Apple senior management just bug me. Still there are great engineers and designers in the background, still doing great stuff and so Apple still stay just ahead for me. But the lead is tiny and not worth anything like the premium that Schiller and Cook seem to thinks it’s worth.
 
Sure there is. Apple does this kind of segmentation all the time. Retina came to the iPhone 4 and then included it in iPads 1.5 years later. Touch ID first came to the iPhone then to the iPad a year later. Apple Pencil was first introduced in the original iPad Pro then came to the 9.7" model 6 months later. The iPhone 7+ has dual cameras with optical zoom and faux depth of field blurring while the iPhone 7 only has a single lens digital zoom. AW Series 2 is water resistant and has GPS, Series 1 has neither.

That is not to say AR won't make it to lower tiered models. It will. But Apple -- if you look at the prototypes of each and camera placement -- won't include it this year. Apple rarely rolls out big features across all models at the same time. Apple isn't alone in this practice. Car manufactures, for example, routinely launch new features first in their flagship model and then push out to lower level models as the cost of the feature declines.

The reason they demoed ARKit on the iPad Pro was not to sell AR on the iPad Pro but to show developers that the iPad Pro can do the work of a laptop. Apple is invested in convincing the world that tablets are the next laptop.

Your rant is weak. The iPhone 4 was the only device to include the Retina display at the time simply because of the technology available at the time. The Retina display was new technology at the time. Apple was not able to introduce Retina display at a larger scale for other hand held devices , laptops and desktops at that time, simple.

Touch ID was simply due to supply, it was a new technology and they could not supply it in both iPhone and iPad at the time.

What’s your point about the Apple Pencil? It came out on the only pro iPad at the time. The screen on the iPad Pro line is different than other iPads.

Again. What’s your point about the iPhone 7 and 7 plus? The iPhone 7 is physically a larger phone. Thus it has more cameras a bigger screen, more ram and bigger battery. Or would you want Apple to magically squeeze all of that in a smaller phone and hope it works the same way as it does now?

The Apple Watch really? If you want one with water resistance and gps you get that model. If you don’t, get the other model.

You people seem to think Apple is constantly supplying us with old technology because another company may have introduced it first. Apple takes their time until they can have the hardware fined tuned to their spec. Plain and simple. This has been explained over and over by Apple as well as other tech sites out there. It is hard to introduce a brand new hardware technology across all devices because they either cannot meet the demand or they haven’t scaled the tech to suit that device yet. Even with oled displays, I’ve read many reports that Samsung could not supply, themselves, others and Apple because Apple quantities will be far too much. The iMac pro that is due to be released in December, why December? The hardware needed for it is not yet available. The Home Pod? Software is not ready. I could go on and on...

Apple goal is to release amazing devices people would want and enjoy, and make money. It makes 0 sense from a business stand point to hold back on technology that they have maturely developed and ready to ship, only to sell at a later date. If Apple has not released it, it’s simply because they cannot without negative consequences.
 
Probably about the only advantage you'll get from this new phone is knowing for the next three years you'll be able to upgrade the OS. It's a shame Apple consider their slightly older phones as the cheaper alternative because you know those OS upgrades will end much sooner.
 
Sure there is. Apple does this kind of segmentation all the time. Retina came to the iPhone 4 and then included it in iPads 1.5 years later. Touch ID first came to the iPhone then to the iPad a year later. Apple Pencil was first introduced in the original iPad Pro then came to the 9.7" model 6 months later. The iPhone 7+ has dual cameras with optical zoom and faux depth of field blurring while the iPhone 7 only has a single lens digital zoom. AW Series 2 is water resistant and has GPS, Series 1 has neither.
I've a feeling if you're expecting AR wonderfulness from this iPhone you'll be disappointed. All your examples show Apple introducing a feature then rolling it out to other devices. AR Kit has already been introduced, the iPad Pro is already established as ground zero, the "iPhone 8" will not surpass this in terms of functionality. In-fact if the iPhone 8 has extra features/requirements to take advantage of AR Kit giving it out to developers via the iPad Pro would have been a waste of everybody's time.
 
You couldn't be further from the truth.
I don't get all the whining. A fantastic electronic device that does multiple jobs.
No camera to carry, games in the pocket , internet etc.etc.

Well there are plenty of fantastic electronic devices that do the jobs you listed and more for 1/3 - 1/2 of the price (like the one plus 3/3T/5 or nexus 5X). And of course people who care about price can go buy those phones or one of Apple's older phones. That's not what people are complaining about, the reason everyone is angry is that apple is finally going to catch up with the rest of the industry with a larger screen and wireless charging but instead of updating their main line, they are keeping it unchanged and charging an ever higher fee for this phone. If all you can afford is to pay them €760 (price in Europe) for the 32GB model, then tough luck, all you get is an iPhone 6 with tiny changes.
 
That's three Samsung phones with oled. They have many more models than that.
So what? the point is they used OLED in not only flagships but also in budget models.because OLED is nothing "premium" or super expensive as Apple -MiGHT- try to market it accordingly.
Samsung S2,S3,S4,S5,S6,S7,S8
And Note 1,2,3,4,5,7,8 all had OLED since 2010..
Also budget range S3 Mini,S4 Mini,S5 Mini,etc etc
Only a fool will think OLED Screen should hike the price so much.
 
I've a feeling if you're expecting AR wonderfulness from this iPhone you'll be disappointed. All your examples show Apple introducing a feature then rolling it out to other devices. AR Kit has already been introduced, the iPad Pro is already established as ground zero, the "iPhone 8" will not surpass this in terms of functionality. In-fact if the iPhone 8 has extra features/requirements to take advantage of AR Kit giving it out to developers via the iPad Pro would have been a waste of everybody's time.

No, I don't care at all about AR or VR. But I do know as someone who has been watching Apple for 35 years what its current M.O. is. If you look at how the camera goes vertical on the new flagship where it remains horizontal on the 7s+ that is telling.

Again, ARKit on iPad Pro was just to show off the hardware guts. It's one thing to program for AR on the iPad. It's another to use AR on the iPad. Think about it- you don't walk around town with an iPad Pro the way you do an iPhone. AR's max usefullness is found outdoors. It's why the iPad Pro doesn't have dual cameras like the iPhone 7+. Only a handful of tourist use the iPad as a camera.
 
Well there are plenty of fantastic electronic devices that do the jobs you listed and more for 1/3 - 1/2 of the price (like the one plus 3/3T/5 or nexus 5X). And of course people who care about price can go buy those phones or one of Apple's older phones. That's not what people are complaining about, the reason everyone is angry is that apple is finally going to catch up with the rest of the industry with a larger screen and wireless charging but instead of updating their main line, they are keeping it unchanged and charging an ever higher fee for this phone. If all you can afford is to pay them €760 (price in Europe) for the 32GB model, then tough luck, all you get is an iPhone 6 with tiny changes.
You think by including wireless charging Apple is catching up? Their entire ecosystem is way ahead of the competition even without it.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.