HobeSoundDarryl
macrumors G5
For younger people, it's more than just a mobile device. It's something they use for literally 4+ hours a day, every day. It's their camera, communicator, computer, audio and video consumer, banking & wallet, social life and basically everything else.
Maybe but who pays for it? If Mommy & Daddy decide this price is too high and buys Junior or Junette some other brand of smart phone for substantially less, can Junior still take pictures, communicate, compute, consume media, bank & buy, socialize and basically everything else? Why yes... yes they can. Can they do that for 4+ hours a day, every day on other company phones? Why yes... yes they can.
That's an issue here. It's not a question of whether or not a phone can be deemed essential (though I personally might think there is plenty of debate in that question too). The question is: does this rumored price- if it pans out- prove to be "the straw" for the masses (that are not raging fans that would roll over and pay anything)? There are more choices than just iPhone 8 or bust. We can beat down anything that is NOT an iPhone all we want but those other phones will do much of what iPhones do (some have added features iPhone can't yet do). Mommy & Daddy might decide the kiddies should have a different brand of phone, where they might be able to get 2 or 3 for the kiddies for $1000.
And yes, some of the kiddies may whine about it. But given the choice of free phone vs. no phone vs. getting a job and paying for their own phone, which will most of the kiddies choose?
Last edited: