Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Less is less. But Apple wants you to pay always more.
Bye bye Apple. You're just for brainwashed nowadays.
 
There's a few android phones that come with USB-C cables and a USB-C to USB-A adapter. I don't see why Apple can't do the same. It's going to be a sad day when an android phone can connect to the new MBP out of the box but a new iPhone needs an adapter.
 
The Watch is induction so I can see Apple getting rid of the Lightning Port, having zero ports and adopting induction charging. So they have induction for fast charging and wireless RF trickle charging. I can see the wireless chip added, but the ability to true wireless charge will be at select supporting locations like Apple Stores and Airports. I don't see Apple coming out with a wireless adapter. Otherwise USB-C will never replace the Lightning connector. Apple likes to regulate those things.
 
One of the main advantages with USB-C to lightning is that MacBooks and iOS devices could use the same chargers and power banks!
 
They are trying their hardest to make people mad.

1. Adopting a gimmick charging system years after everyone else.
2. Not being able to plug the phone in to a new MacBook Pro out of the box.

There is really no reason why should you want to "plug" something in your phone in 2017 if everything can be wireless - they just need to work on the SW to make it possible. I am quite curious how Apple will solve the charging.
 
Both. The feature is useless, and the technology has been around forever. If they were going to add this gimmick, they should have added it years ago.
If the feature is useless, there is zero reason to criticise Apple for adding this feature a couple of years after it appeared in other phones.
 
You may think Apple's offerings are currently substandard. I would say that they are superior in ways that aren’t important to you, and that’s fine – but just because you don’t value the same things as other people doesn’t make the product of low standards. You should be able to look beyond your own needs and tastes. Not everyone is the same as you.
I think he is suggesting lower standards than their rivals, but at higher prices still..
[doublepost=1486925273][/doublepost]
There is really no reason why should you want to "plug" something in your phone in 2017 if everything can be wireless - they just need to work on the SW to make it possible. I am quite curious how Apple will solve the charging.
How they solve every problem, buy a small company working on the solution and pass it off as they own. The ifans lap it up and believe they invented it. Touch ID anyone? Lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: Demo Kit
Am I the only one that is tired of the direction Apple is going? Not only is the pricing of all of their products becoming ridiculous they then want to charge you extra for something that should have been included with it in the first place.

I don't want to pay a premium for a product then have to purchase multiple dongles to get the FN thing to work. I am in the process of purchasing/building my second high end custom PC and sad thing is it is less expensive for me to build two units than to purchase the high end version for Apple that has been outdated and un upgradable.
I see Apple loosing ground in the next few years with the direction that they are going. Nothing eye catching and higher prices are pushing people to alternatives and I'm seeing many out in the market.

ill stick with my 6+S for now and really don't see any erasing to upgrade until Apple stops supporting it which seems to be just a few years.
 
Tim Cook is charging $1000 without standard accessories for a device that costs about $200 to make out of his own heart because he doesn't believe in working for money.
Apple actually publishes is gross margin and it has been around 40% for several years. For the iPhone the gross margin has been estimated to be as high as 55%. Apple also publishes the average selling price of an iPhone which has been a bit below $700. Overall the cost of goods sold can thus be put at around $300. This of course is an average over all iPhones, more expensive phones (larger screen, more storage) are both more expensive to manufacture and tend to have a higher gross margin. Probably the cost of goods sold of a $1000 iPhone is thus more like $400 and the gross margin 60%.
[doublepost=1486927743][/doublepost]
I'm fine with lighting, but Apple needs to ship the iPhone with a USB-C charger and USB-C to lightning cable.
I think Apple should have shipped the 2016 MBP (and maybe already the 2016 MB) with a USB-C to Lightning cable. The probability that a MBP owner also has an iPhone or iPad is pretty high (maybe 80%) and if an accessory is needed by 80% of all users, including it seems like a reasonable idea (ok, out of those 80% a lot of people might not regularly connect their iOS device to the MBP but I bet most will do so at least occasionally).
 
Rushing headlong into the land of Samsung gimmicks and expecting $1000+ phones with increasing product fragmentation is unsustainable
 
  • Like
Reactions: Demo Kit
I love the huff you guys get yourselves worked up into over poorly sourced (or elaborated) rumors this forum decides to stuff together.

For god's sake, take a breath.
 
in all seriousness a bezel-free 5.0 will have the same physical size or smaller? as the current 4.7". thus smaller physical footprint on the equivalent current iPhone. in my view that is good :)

but when i read 4.7, 5.0, 5.5 i obviously assume they are talking about the screen size and not the size of the phone itself or do you by a 60 inch tv with the size of a 50 inch tv? ;)
 
Current wireless charging is absolutely pointless, its a total gimmick. You cannot use your phone without interrupting its charge and it charges slower than via cable. I think Apple are waiting for a system which can actually charge your device at range. While it would be slower to charge than even current wireless charging, it would be continuously charging no matter where you are in a room for example.

I do wish they'd make a new 4" phone also WITHOUT gimped specs. As in a feature-full current iPhone, just shrunken slightly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aldaris
Include Lightning to USB C cable. Include a USB C (F) to USB A (M) adaptor. And make it run at USB 3.x. Skip the wireless charging. It's not a toothbrush.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SeattleMoose
What other improvement or advancement are we looking at here? OLED displays are not new, nor is inductive charging, if this rumour is correct (now, if its 'baseless' RF charging then maybe). Most of the other rumoured features are cosmetic, in which case 'visible antenna lines' and protruding lenses are significant. They also belie a "form-over-function" or, worse, "headline features over function" design ethic.

I.e.
"let's make it 1mm thinner"
"but then the lens will protrude - and we'll have to make the battery 10% smaller - why make the case thinner than the thickest component?"
"sure, but we can still promote it as 'the thinnest iPhone ever' and if we pick the right benchmark we can still claim the same battery life"

...and the visible antenna lines thing worked out well for the iPhone 4, didn't it?

As the phone becomes larger, it has to become thinner in order to fit into the hand as easily as before. So making the iPhone 6 thinner was making it more ergonomic and useable, even if it meant a protruding camera.

It's a case of "form enables function" here, rather than "form over function".
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.