Describe long range? Bearing in mind this is electricity flowing through the air.As long as the wireless charging is long-range, all is good.
They are trying their hardest to make people mad.
1. Adopting a gimmick charging system years after everyone else.
2. Not being able to plug the phone in to a new MacBook Pro out of the box.
If the feature is useless, there is zero reason to criticise Apple for adding this feature a couple of years after it appeared in other phones.Both. The feature is useless, and the technology has been around forever. If they were going to add this gimmick, they should have added it years ago.
I think he is suggesting lower standards than their rivals, but at higher prices still..You may think Apple's offerings are currently substandard. I would say that they are superior in ways that aren’t important to you, and that’s fine – but just because you don’t value the same things as other people doesn’t make the product of low standards. You should be able to look beyond your own needs and tastes. Not everyone is the same as you.
How they solve every problem, buy a small company working on the solution and pass it off as they own. The ifans lap it up and believe they invented it. Touch ID anyone? LolThere is really no reason why should you want to "plug" something in your phone in 2017 if everything can be wireless - they just need to work on the SW to make it possible. I am quite curious how Apple will solve the charging.
Apple actually publishes is gross margin and it has been around 40% for several years. For the iPhone the gross margin has been estimated to be as high as 55%. Apple also publishes the average selling price of an iPhone which has been a bit below $700. Overall the cost of goods sold can thus be put at around $300. This of course is an average over all iPhones, more expensive phones (larger screen, more storage) are both more expensive to manufacture and tend to have a higher gross margin. Probably the cost of goods sold of a $1000 iPhone is thus more like $400 and the gross margin 60%.Tim Cook is charging $1000 without standard accessories for a device that costs about $200 to make out of his own heart because he doesn't believe in working for money.
I think Apple should have shipped the 2016 MBP (and maybe already the 2016 MB) with a USB-C to Lightning cable. The probability that a MBP owner also has an iPhone or iPad is pretty high (maybe 80%) and if an accessory is needed by 80% of all users, including it seems like a reasonable idea (ok, out of those 80% a lot of people might not regularly connect their iOS device to the MBP but I bet most will do so at least occasionally).I'm fine with lighting, but Apple needs to ship the iPhone with a USB-C charger and USB-C to lightning cable.
but when i read 4.7, 5.0, 5.5 i obviously assume they are talking about the screen size and not the size of the phone itself or do you by a 60 inch tv with the size of a 50 inch tv?![]()
iOS has always been water, I'd love some dynamic wallpapers with ripples or something like thatOn a positive note can we start getting wallpapers of galaxies again on the macOS as well as iOS (as pictured)?![]()
What other improvement or advancement are we looking at here? OLED displays are not new, nor is inductive charging, if this rumour is correct (now, if its 'baseless' RF charging then maybe). Most of the other rumoured features are cosmetic, in which case 'visible antenna lines' and protruding lenses are significant. They also belie a "form-over-function" or, worse, "headline features over function" design ethic.
I.e.
"let's make it 1mm thinner"
"but then the lens will protrude - and we'll have to make the battery 10% smaller - why make the case thinner than the thickest component?"
"sure, but we can still promote it as 'the thinnest iPhone ever' and if we pick the right benchmark we can still claim the same battery life"
...and the visible antenna lines thing worked out well for the iPhone 4, didn't it?
in all seriousness a bezel-free 5.0 will have the same physical size or smaller? as the current 4.7". thus smaller physical footprint on the equivalent current iPhone. in my view that is good![]()